Doncaster Council tries to gag me by fooling WordPress again

MP John Hemming outs Doncaster Council over injunction – this was the headline in METRO on 26 April, 2011.

On the same day John Hemming MP published on his blog Gag Removed – Job Done.

On 13 May I started www.vickyhaigh.wordpress.com.

People may be in contempt of court. But when courts try to gag MPs and contact with them, they are in contempt of Parliament which is where the law of the land is being made!

But Doncaster Council don’t believe it. They think that everybody must fall for their ‘make believe court documents’ and tremble with fear before their threats. In the interest of the child who has said on Police video in 2009 that her father abuses her!!!???

They don’t seem to realise the international support that is out there FOR victims such as Vicky Haigh and AGAINST Social Services and Local Councils such as theirs.

They don’t even know that UK law can only be imposed in the UK.  Paul Randle-Jolliffe writes:

It would not be a fact in UK law that someone resident outside the UK is required by any law to comply with an order from a UK court unless it relates to matters they do in the UK.

Provided they do not breach any law in the country they reside in or any order from a court where they reside or any international law it may be a crime in the UK for any one to say that they “MUST” or “SHOULD” comply with such a UK court order under Protection from Harassment Act 1997:

s1 Prohibition of harassment

(1A) A person must not pursue a course of conduct -
(a) which involves harassment of two or more persons, and
(b) which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and
(c) by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)-
(i) not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or
(ii) to do something that he is not under any obligation to do.

An order of a UK court has no jurisdiction outside the UK and criminal and professional complaints can be made.

Unless proper international procedures have been followed, they can ask nicely but cannot be required, and no offence or contempt is committed as the acts are outside UK and jurisdiction.

But WordPress do realise this time round! THANKS TO JOHN HEMMING MP who outed not only Vicky Haigh but also Doncaster Council. The rest was done by the Twitter page on the abuser!!!

Google spots that I log on from “left of Berlin” – well beyond any UK jurisdiction. Maybe Doncaster Council will cotton on, too?

About these ads

About Sabine McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter.
This entry was posted in Publicity and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Doncaster Council tries to gag me by fooling WordPress again

  1. Jake Maverick says:

    good show!

    been wondering though…VPN? if you use one of them it ‘looks’ like you accessing from a completely different country to, dnt know a lot abt them, but there must be a version that will even let you pick which country to ‘write’ from? so you can pick and choose which laws you want to be ‘bound’ by……
    not only ‘looks’ actually….the data does actually come from that location, even if it was indirectly sent there from soemwhere else….
    and astronauts? if they have internet they must be able to legally send whatever they like…no ‘jurisidction’ up there once out of the airspace….so invest in a sat phone and bounce off a satellite? ;-)
    and do you need a passport to go str8 up? especially ocnsidering i wdn’t want to come back down again….

    what’s all this legal jumbo mean anyway? it’s totally irrelevant, the enemy are exempt from it so we’re never gonna have a ‘win’ if we keep capitulating to these frackers?

  2. Pingback: Vicky sacks the “guardian” of her daughter; we need “McKenzie Angels” as “Public Guardian Angels” « Vicky Haigh: requesting her daughter to return

  3. Anonymous says:

    LAST KNOWN ADDRESS WAS ERITH, KENT.

    Since August 2010 her parents have been forbidden by Haringey Council to see or phone her;

    Haringey Council have refused her aunts, uncles and grandparents (9 family members in all) any contact with these children even though they all came especially from Africa to see her!

    She has 5 sisters and a brother, and none of them have seen her for weeks!

    Even the Ambassador WAS REFUSED PERMISSION!

    This child needs YOUR HELP!! SHE IS IN TERRIBLE DANGER!!

    HARINGEY cannot afford another scandal after the deaths of Baby P and Victoria Climbé.

    They will stop at nothing to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds!

    We do not know if she is alive or dead!! PLEASE, PLEASE, find and contact this child. She is in the hands of PAEDOPHILES who are WICKED AND VERY DANGEROUS!!

  4. Anonymous says:

    Social Engineering On A Grand Scale

    I’ve been involved in a friend’s legal case and its a very messed-up situation. Essentially, anyone can make a malicious allegation about child cruelty and it initiates a huge infrastructure of highly-paid… “professionals” who put self-interest first. The legal bill in the UK for the “protection” o…f 60,000 children is astronomical. Cases take between 49 and 78 weeks to conclude and are rarely cut short. All UK family law cases are held in secrecy and this attracts the least competent of the legal profession. Barristers with decades of experience, earning 200-500 pound per hour don’t know the law. But that doesn’t matter because perjury is commonplace. Cases often cost 0.5 million pound and the results are dismal. From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new​s/article-405578/60-000-childr​en-care-betrayed-fail-school.h​tml :-

    o A quarter of girls in care have been pregnant by the time they leave and half are single mothers within two years.
    o Half of all prisoners under the age of 25 have been through the care system.
    o A third of the homeless are people who were brought up in state care.
    o Only 60 out of 6,000 young people leaving care each year goes to university.

    But it would be cheaper to cancel the court cases and send these kids to top private schools and also give them personal mentors and intensive psychotherapy. The cost of sending a boy to Eton College over a period of five years is only 168,575 pound. Instead, before any allegations are substantiated to civil standard (“balance of probability”), children are taken forcefully, often from aspiring families are given to chavvy foster parents who are given 360-437 pound per child per week excluding expenses. Publicising your case is Contempt Of Court, a criminal matter which sees 200 parents per year imprisoned.

    I knew that UK laws were draconian but I didn’t know how bad they were until I investigated for a friend. I discovered that any spurious allegation can be investigated, any evidence can be gathered and in the case of the Police And Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Section 18, the Children Act 1989 Section 37(3)(a) and the Mental Health Act 1983 Section 2, a reason only needs to be provided for ceasing to interfere with a person’s liberty. There are safeguards but there are also emergency provisions which circumvent all safeguards. There are time limits but those are irrelevant if courts are overwhelmed with cases. The Mental Health Act also allows medics (not only qualified doctors) to backdate notes with complete immunity.

    There’s an economic recession but there’s no shortage of government funded adverts for fostering and adoption. High streets in controversial London Borough Of Haringey were recently plastered in adverts for adoption (“It’s never been easier”), till receipts from my local supermarket have adverts for foster care agencies and The London Borough Of Brent has been advertising on buses. Why does this happen? Adoption targets and bonuses are assigned to local government but legal costs are assigned to central government. If a local government department doesn’t meet targets then budget cuts are imposed and people lose their jobs. So, local government is very motivated to meet targets – even if it involves heavy advertising or free loft conversions worth 30,000 pound – so that people can take more kids.

    2% of parents get their kids back and most of the “winners” pay extensive legal fees. The remainder may receive a lifetime injunction and see their children adopted abroad without their permission. The UK is one of the few countries in the world where forced adoption by the state is legal. However, it is a lucrative trade where healthy, well-adjusted children obtain up to 120,000 pound in “fees”. Officially, adoption quotas have been abandoned but they have only been replaced with adoption targets and I’ve seen evidence that they were running as recently as Tue 11 Jan 2011.

    Essentially, child “protection” is a very big game where you *might* get children returned if you pay enough to the legal profession. The most worrying part is that no-one’s impartial. There’s supposedly checks and balances of Independant Reviews, Children’s Guardians and child charities. However, there’s one dirty little secret. They all work together and they’re all staffed with qualified Social Workers. If you telephone the NSPCC, Barnado’s, ChildLine or Voice then you’ll speak to a qualified Social Worker who forwards details to your legal opposition. Some of the telephone operators will initially deny that they’re qualified Social Workers but you can check their registration ( http://www.gscc.org.uk/registe​rSearch.php ) during any telephone call. This website happens to be run by the Social Workers’ official organisation where, like doctors, registration is mandatory and there is a strict Code Of Conduct, which is taken seriously.

    So, I was asked to collate a list of Social Workers in London. However, that’s a vague task when poor data quality is involved. The easiest solution was to scrape the entire dataset. From this, I discovered that the UK has 94,211 registered Social Workers and 16,194 registered students. Next, I was asked if I could collate it with any other public dataset, such as the leaked British National Party list of members. Although the veracity of this list cannot be determined, the intersection is not null. For example, Mr Freddy Longmuir, 30 Old Mill Lane, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S70 2LB, UK, +44 (0)7974 334624, hullfreddy@aol.com, is 50, a company director, has a Bachelors Degree in Politics, a Masters Degree in Social Work, registered as Social Worker E/1021782 in Barnsley on Fri 24 Apr 2008 and was named as a paid member of the British National Party in Nov 2008. You can check all of these details yourself because they’re all in the public domain.See More
    ..

  5. Pingback: Doncaster Council was told ‘children will die’ – Newsnight programme of 5 March 2009 « Vicky Haigh: requesting her daughter to return

  6. Pingback: Whether it’s good press or bad press, do not believe it. PR Guru Max Clifford. « Vicky Haigh: requesting her daughter to return

  7. Pingback: On the Public Persecution of John Hemming MP « Vicky Haigh: requesting her daughter to return

  8. Pingback: Two weeks after the event: Sir Nicholas Wall’s judgements « Victims Unite!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s