No, you can’t imagine it:
- Whilst kept in Holloway prison, Melissa has been asked to say good bye to her son over videolink – by a local authority who has made up a big story about her and managed not only to put her into prison but now locked up on a 24-hour basis and drugged against her will…
- Gloria Musa has had to undergo an ‘adjudication’ where she asked for our help as McKenzie Friends, but that would require ‘prior arrangement’ – which was perfectly impossible to arrange.
The humiliation that Gloria has to endure, instead of living her usual life as a happy family serving God and Christian communities, is horrendous.
However, we have not only launched an Association of McKenzie Friends, we have also joined forces with two charities that have ample experience with making life easier for prisoners: Spurgeons and Women in Prison.
More on our latest press release regarding the Musas and their six kidnapped children. It refers to our letter to Sir Nicholas Wall, the President of the Family Division, in the hope that he’ll sort things out.
Ten videos of our latest meeting in Westminster under the auspices of John Hemming MP are on http://www.youtube.com/user/EDM1297
Related articles
- Please use Email a Prisoner to Send Gloria Musa your Prayers [A 2767 CJ] (gloriamusa.wordpress.com)
- Nigerian nurse in Holloway: such conditions would not be tolerated in her own country (gloriamusa.wordpress.com)
- Whistleblowers predict “sectioning” to be the next step for the Musas to Silence them (gloriamusa.wordpress.com)
- Bishop Gloria Musa fasting and weeping in HMP Holloway – Please Help Get the Children back! (gloriamusa.wordpress.com)
- On the Dangers of acting as McKenzie Friend of Victims of Child Abuse (mckenzies4fairness.wordpress.com)
- Visiting Prisoners as “Social Life with Meaning” – while Express unearthes this National Scandal (victims-unite.net)
- The Most Evil and Corrupt of all Child Snatching Cases in the UK (gloriamusa.wordpress.com)
- Where is Favour Musa? Appealing to all UK Police Stations (victims-unite.net)
- Please do everything to get us out of this hell hole. We are innocent. (gloriamusa.wordpress.com)





![Book by Evan Whitton Why Everyone Is a Victim [Except Rich Criminals]](http://edm1297.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/ocls.jpg?w=171&h=264)




Mar 10, 2012 @ 19:56:29
Mr. President and all officers of the courts around the world: WHY ARE YOU LETTING PEOPLE WHO DON’T KNOW US JUDGE US AND TAKE OUR CHILDREN? Why are wars being fought around the world and there is no money for homeless mothers and children who have been destroyed by the devastation to the economy here in the US and around the world because all of the resources that should be put to rebuild the infrastructure of this country is being used to destroy the infrastructure of the world?
WHY do the banks own our homes and our business are now in bankruptcy because corporate giants get huge tax breaks and pay almost nothing for water and utilities and we pay the highest price for everything, AND NOW YOU LET THEM TAKE OUR CHILDREN BECAUSE WE ARE POOR? Why does the CIA AND OTHER GOVERNMENT SERVICES bring drugs into this country and distribute them to drug dealers and destroy our children before they are grown, and then they are jailed because they are involved in THE SOCIETY THAT OUR GOVERNMENT CREATED?
WHY are pharmaceutical companies making billions of dollars of profit off of drugs that addict and kill our children, our family and friends and our superstars AND THEY PAY NOTHING FOR THE RIGHT TO DEAL DRUGS TO AMERICANS and our youth, and they are destroying the very fabric of our society for profit… why, WITH ALL THIS SCREWED UP CRAP GOING ON AROUND THE WORLD, ARE YOU LETTING AN OBSOLETE SOCIAL SERVICES SYSTEM TAKE OUR CHILDREN AND GIVE THEM TO ABUSERS AND MOLESTERS AND KILLERS AND YOU PUT MOTHERS AND GRANDMOTHERS IN JAIL FOR FIGHTING FOR THE RIGHTS TO OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN? WHY, MR PRESIDENT, WHY, WHY, WHY… and don’t try to use the separation of powers and it’s not your job as an excuse.
IT IS YOUR JOB TO GET INVOLVED AND FIX THE PROBLEMS WHEN SOMEONE OR SOMETHING IS DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY, and you have a PLATE FULL OF PEOPLE AND BUSINESSES AND LOBBYISTS AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE DESTROYING OUR PEOPLE AND OUR COUNTRY,FROM WITHIN!
Mr. President, IT IS YOUR JOB TO FIX WHAT IS BROKEN IN THIS COUNTRY, AND AROUND THE WORLD!
THAT is what we hired you for, NOW, DO YOUR JOB! STOP CPS AND SOCIAL SERVICES FROM TAKING CHILDREN FROM THEIR MOTHERS AND GIVE BACK THE ONES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN TAKEN, AND GIVE THEM BACK NOW!!!
McKenzie Friend « Escapee's Blog
Mar 11, 2012 @ 11:36:05
Mar 11, 2012 @ 20:06:21
Sabine – you need to experience being put in prison yourself – then you wouldn’t have to “Imagine it”.
Just imagine – Sabine K McNeil – imprisoned for aiding and abetting corruption & Fraud to be ‘concealed’.
Mar 11, 2012 @ 20:36:29
WTF IS THAT ALL ABOUT? Here, this is what women face today, it is fiction, but in reality, this is what this government is doing to us… by taking our children and giving them to our abusers… this isn’t about that, it just represents the abuse of women by the system…
http://futurismic.com/2010/07/01/new-fiction-your-life-sentence-by-c-c-finlay/
Mar 11, 2012 @ 21:19:35
Calm down dear …. just calm down with yer WTF stuff…
Mar 11, 2012 @ 23:30:25
sooorrrryyyy…. ty…
Mar 12, 2012 @ 07:35:21
I can’t imagine how a so called “caring and compassionate” society allow what is happening to the Musas to go on. It is like something out of 1984.
Mar 12, 2012 @ 13:43:02
Tragic: Annabelle Lee Morris hanged herself when she found out that her son (face blanked) had been adopted
A tragic teenage mother’s body was found hanged days after she discovered her baby had been adopted by another family.
Annabelle Lee Morris, 19, could not cope with her son being taken into care and then put up for adoption.
Her father, Thomas James Morris, found her in her bedroom on March 18 last year – nine days after she found out that her son had new adoptive parents, York Coroner’s Court was told.
The authorities had intervened as she was struggling to look after him herself.
Speaking after the inquest, her cousin, Lorna Dawber, said: ‘She adored her son and had she accepted the help when it was there her future would have been completely different. In time she would have got there.
‘That was the one thing in life that was hers, she absolutely worshipped him.’
She said Annabelle would not have put her family through that deliberately.
‘She was a good soul and she had a good heart,’ she said.
The inquest heard that the child was taken into foster care when he was less than a year old.
Annabelle, from York, was still allowed to see him a few times a week, but when a psychologist raised further serious concerns, steps were taken to have the baby adopted.
Mar 12, 2012 @ 11:40:11
If Stevie H. Would only face the TRUTH instead of Negative irrelevant
remarks we might achieve some help for children who are sold, traded,
SRA ( sexual ritually abused ), It would also save the sanity of parents and
grandparents that cannot believe this evil exist !
You only have to Google: Royal Commission Enquiry NSW police paedophiles
to see the facts ! concerning total depravity of so-called social workers, teachers, religeos leaders of all faiths, police, judges,
It,s All in the report Vol 4.
Get real Hamilton, were you abused ? are you an abuser ? You do your
incompetent best to bring this web site and Victims Unite into disrepute !
Any fool can see from Your Comments, if you do not like the facts,
the “tactless truth” then pester Social Services for their opinions, You
might end-up ” emotionally disturbed ” and taken from you mother
Mar 12, 2012 @ 13:10:40
‘Negative irrelevant remarks’
Physician, heal thyself.
Mar 12, 2012 @ 14:31:36
Rogert Dooran.
What is irrelevant ? The Royal Commission Enquiry NSW
Police Paedophiles.
350 pages. of in depth investigation into Government Departments. abuse
of Trust, Failure to perform their duty, Omission, Criminal Offences. Etc. Etc.
You are in denial, head up ar-e, you don,t think it happens in the UK.
and you sure as hell don,t want the Royal Commission Report read by
concerned citizens world wide, but it will be, because you keep giving me
the opportunity to mention it, Thank you very much indeed, for and on
behalf of abused children everywhere. !
Please Google: Royal Commission Enquiry NSW Police Paedophiles Vol.4.
Paras 80 through 88 very very sordid !
Mar 12, 2012 @ 14:50:10
‘What is irrelevant ? The Royal Commission Enquiry NSW Police Paedophiles.’
It is completely irrelevant. What do police paedophiles on the other side of the planet have to do with the Musa family’s predicament?
‘Thank you very much indeed’
You’re welcome.
Mar 12, 2012 @ 16:45:41
It is NOT just about Police Paedophiles You ignorant bugger !
It also reveals NSW Social Services selling children ( child trafficking )
supplying paedophiles with children even a dipstick can work out there must
be at Least 3 more Vols. to get to Vol 4.
It covers the whole bloody lot of Government department Gross Negligence
Incompetence, the blasted lot !
Read the Report before making a bloody fool of yourself. And if you can go
along with that behaviour, your bloody sick !
Mar 12, 2012 @ 17:00:57
Please explain what the report has to do with the Musa family.
‘your bloody sick !’
You still haven’t worked out how to use an apostrophe.
Mar 12, 2012 @ 19:10:50
I don,t need to know how to use an apostrophe, knob head.
You are that bloody daft, I must be nuts responding to your clap trap.
You claim Australia is on the other side of the planet when most people know
it,s a 24 hour plane ride from anywhere in Europe.
Australia is a member of the Commonwealth same queen, same laws, same oaths, the significance of the Royal Commission report is the AUTHORITIES
cannot be trusted ! , therefore it is reasonable to assume the Musa,s are
the victims of corrupt AUTHORITIES.
If you can read you will note that the paedophiles in Australia swop, trade,
use children from the USA NAMBLA. and England PIE. in other words
boy lovers send their victims worldwide in a matter of days, but then
again I think you knew that ! tell me is your a-re sore ? because I think
you are one of them,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, sorry about the apostropheeeeeees
Mar 13, 2012 @ 10:27:29
‘You claim Australia is on the other side of the planet’
That’s because it is.
‘Australia is a member of the Commonwealth same queen, same laws’
Are you seriously suggesting that Australia has the same laws as the UK? This is clearly nonsense.
‘paedophiles in Australia swop, trade, use children from the USA NAMBLA. and England PIE’
Is this honestly what you think has happened in the Musa’s case?
‘tell me is your a-re sore ? because I think you are one of them’
If I was a paedophile why would my bottom be sore? You really are a dimwit.
Mar 12, 2012 @ 21:53:46
Wow, somebody told me to calm down… hey, i think both of you are right, the fact is that IT IS so complicated and SO unbelievable that people with a certain mind set DON’T BELIEVE IT, people with another set of experiences believes it but won’t talk about it and then their are a lot of people that speak out because it has happened to them or someone they love and they are very emotional about it, it’s called “passionate”… and i think every human being feels strongly about whatever they believe in, but we have common beliefs that we don’t identify and we end up talking about things that we barely scratch the surface of… i think about things all of the time… i live in one of the nightmares. what gets me through the days and nights is only the fact that a lot of people are a lot worse off than i am and if i don’t try to do something about it i’m a sorry human being.
that’s all. IF IT IS BROKEN, there may be more than one way to fix it, but THAT DOESN’T CHANGE THE FACT THAT IT IS BROKEN… see? protect our mothers and children. their basic human rights are being denied…
Mar 13, 2012 @ 10:57:20
Dear Robert.
You are outclassed, out witted, and compounding your own
stupidity. Just read Royal Commission Enquiry NSW Police Paedophiles
and the attendant Volumes.
The difference between myself and yourself is I quote from Official Govnt.
Records New South Wales Australia. NSW Australia it,s 18 hours on
British Airways, Emirates. Singapore Airlines, LHR. or Manchester.
And the Judges of Australia, Police, swear allegiance to the queen, in the
same-way Australian navy ships are named HMAS.
The laws of Australia are virtually the same as the UK there are of course
local bye laws etc.
It should take you approx. six months to read the Royal Commission
Enquiry NSW Police Peadophiles, then you can comment on the grammeer,
speeleng, apostrophes, full stops, etc.etc. my skooling was approved !
Good item todays Daily Mail 13th March 12. Re: Family Courts & experts
like yourself.
LOL Peter.
Mar 13, 2012 @ 11:28:21
‘it,s 18 hours on British Airways, Emirates. Singapore Airlines, LHR. or Manchester.’
The speed of a flight doesn’t affect a country’s geographic proximity.
‘The laws of Australia are virtually the same as the UK’
That isn’t what you said yesterday.
Better luck next time.
Mar 13, 2012 @ 18:08:30
‘You are outclassed, out witted’
You couldn’t outclass or outwit a squirrel.
‘Good item todays Daily Mail 13th March’
The Mail is a comic bought by simpletons. You might as well quote the Beano.
Mar 14, 2012 @ 00:38:50
ARE YA’LL JUST INFILTRATORS TO TAKE AWAY FROM THE ISSUE
IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE PART OF THE SOLUTION… then go away!
HERE IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW:
UNIVERSAL MOTHERS’ RIGHTS
1) Mothers and children have the unquestionable basic right to be together at will.
2) Mothers have the right to affordable quality medical attention for all children.
3) Mothers have the inalienable, undeniable right to be with their children at will.
4) Becoming a mother, becomes her job and all mothers will be compensated for taking care of their own children.
5) Natural mothers who love their children take precedence over any other being or entity.
6) All children have the right to be with their mothers at least ninety nine percent of the time in their daily lives.
7) All mothers have the right to their be with their children at least ninety nine percent of the time, if she so desires.
8) The father only has rights if he becomes the provider and protector of the mother and child.
9) The natural mother has all rights to her children’s company and care as long as she is needed.
10) No one has the right to terminate a mother’s right to her child/children for any reason, ever.
ANY QUESTIONS?
THESE ARE THE BASIC RIGHTS OF MOTHERS AND THEIR CHILDREN and cannot be changed by any MAN.
Mar 14, 2012 @ 12:35:41
@irevolutiontree
What a load of absolute guff.
2) ‘Mothers have the right to affordable quality medical attention for all children.’
Have you ever heard of the NHS?
4) ‘Becoming a mother, becomes her job and all mothers will be compensated for taking care of their own children.’
Who should pay for this?
7) ‘All mothers have the right to their be with their children at least ninety nine percent of the time, if she so desires.’
Ninety nine percent of the time? What about the child’s right to an education?
8) ‘The father only has rights if he becomes the provider and protector of the mother and child’
This is offensive rubbish. Please define ‘provider and protector’.
10) ‘No one has the right to terminate a mother’s right to her child/children for any reason, ever.’
Even in the event of physical or sexual abuse?
Mar 14, 2012 @ 13:48:44
You think you know things, you have no idea. I will get back to this later. You sound like a very aggressive person to me, I will address each of your statements, and the answers are no, no, yes, no, yes, and not necessarily in that order. Mothers and children need protecting. There would be NO abusive mothers if this society was conducive to MOTHERHOOD! Until you understand that WOMEN DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS that they deserve to be good mothers, i WILL ATTEMPT TO EDUCATE YOU. Who is paying for CPS and family court, and prison and juvenile detention? ALL OF THOSE THINGS WOULD GO AWAY IF MOTHERS WERE SUPPORTED IN BEING MOTHERS. And no mothers do not have rights to healthcare around the world, what rock have you been living under. I will get back to this… and more. love to all, mothers and children, worldwide…
Mar 14, 2012 @ 15:52:12
‘You sound like a very aggressive person to me’
I’m not the one shouting.
‘I will address each of your statements, and the answers are no, no, yes, no, yes, and not necessarily in that order’
This doesn’t make any sense.
Mar 14, 2012 @ 20:03:18
Neither do you ! You pillock. I don,t buy or study the Daily Mail
a journal produced by government security agencies that are so
desperate to ensure the propaganda gets out there it is free on the
tinternet !
Try winding up a clock ! dipstick !
Mar 15, 2012 @ 10:44:19
Dear Peter ‘thick as timber’ Oakes
I knew that you’d bite eventually.
‘Daily Mail a journal produced by government security agencies’
Which government security agencies produce the Daily Mail? and why are they so interested in what Miranda Kerr is wearing?
‘so desperate to ensure the propaganda gets out there it is free on the tinternet !’
I think you’ve misunderstood the concept of the internet.
Mar 19, 2012 @ 20:34:01
Why has Sabine banned Steve H – when he has a lawful right to rebut the scurrilous comments made by Peter Oakes? Isn’t your website supposed to be balanced and fair – or is there a single agenda by the webmaster?
Without fair and balanced reporting – your website brings itself into disrepute – Ms McNeill.
Mar 20, 2012 @ 12:21:14
Steve may have a ‘lawful right’ – just as I have, Andy.
My website is as balanced and fair as the people contributing to it.
I have had enough of Steve. Very simple.
I’m human, you know?
I have set the rules to Outlook to deliver his mails straight to the bin.
For he does it not only in public but also in private and he’s done it to oodles of other people, especially women.
Enough is enough.
Mar 19, 2012 @ 21:52:54
Some people are agitators. They bring nothing to the table but arguments. There are a couple on here that argue with everything they don’t like. Well, I do not like corruption and abuse, so argue with that. People who ARE abusive are argumentative.. there are many justifications for eliminating someone from the conversation, mostly so other people can concentrate on the issues not have a pissing contest with people who push themselves into the conversation without any concern for what the conversation is about. there aren’t a lot of comments here anyway, why would anyone get so worked up about this that they have to be abusive to the creator of the forum? If you don’t like what you read here, go somewhere else. If you disagree with the person whose house you are in, then leave… If it is an open forum, like the real world courtrooms should be, then you have a right to argue, but you would stick to the issues at hand, especially in a courtroom, so treat these blogs as you would someone else’s courtroom… just my thoughts for peace…
Mar 20, 2012 @ 17:39:53
Is there any chance of you answering the questions that I put to you last week?
Mar 30, 2012 @ 09:24:17
Apr 07, 2012 @ 18:19:35
May 19, 2012 @ 13:54:20
May 22, 2012 @ 09:42:36
May 29, 2012 @ 05:01:25