When a mother whose second child is being taken – without paperwork – calls for help because she realises that her solicitor is not acting in her interest, I’m going into a higher gear:
- I invited her to join us at our meeting the House of Commons so that she could realise she is not alone (what a consolation…)
- I put her court hearing on the Meetup list of events to facilitate support – for her, Michael Doherty and Norman Scarth next week
- I talked to other experienced McKenzie Friends to try to understand.
It appears that the “second generation radar” helps Social Services to get hold of children, especially at birth, i.e. the mother was in care as a teenager and thus known to Social Services.
When she was pregnant, she could do whatever – it never satisfied Social Services… So the first baby was taken at 7 months, without paperwork, and the second one 6 days after birth, again without paperwork.
The most experienced Ian Josephs writes that breast feeding is a fundamental human right for mothers and the right NOT to be removed at birth for babies. But Social Services, in collusion with Police, Courts and Judges, are above the law, aren’t they!?…
Related articles
- Reform the Family Courts and Social Services – Petitions on the Government’s site (punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com)
- Written questions for ‘witnesses’, Attorney-General v Scarth. – Norman Scarth (inquiringminds.cc)
- FW: RCJ 23rd Jan. If going, please take this. – Norman Scarth (inquiringminds.cc)
- Ukip row: multiple reasons children taken from Rotherham foster parents (guardian.co.uk)
- AVAAZ Petition to Return UK Children Taken away from Good Families by the Secret Family Court System (acenewsservices.com)
- FW: The Lord Chief Justice no less! I swell with pride!!! – Norman Scarth (inquiringminds.cc)
- THE SATURDAY ESSAY: What is to be done with the lawyers? (hat4uk.wordpress.com)
![Why Everyone Is a Victim [Except Rich Criminals]](http://edm1297.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/ocls.jpg?w=171&h=264 "Book by Evan Whitton")
Jan 19, 2013 @ 22:00:28
Child care industry workers often work from their Masonic Lodges to supply pedophile rings. Also used in Masonic Rituals for higher Degrees, with children. Sacrificial victims are real, not just fiction. In Toronto these pefophile rings stretch all the way to females in Communist Party Lodges.
Jan 20, 2013 @ 03:54:46
I can never understand how Cafcass officers are allowed the freedom to play Gods by self appointing themselves as Guardians and use lies and deceit colluding with Local Authorities and other third parties over a commodity dictated by money.
Children are no longer children, they are commodities for profit.
A judge sitting beneath the crown makes decisions that we are told as Law.
In Family Courts the judge is simply playing the part of a thespian sitting beneath the backdrop of the crown orchestrating a ritual of make belief that should be acting in the interest of human beings. A child and loving parents.
Depending which Law you look at Perjury, Collusions, Conspiracy and Fraud are penal crimes.
In star chambers of Family Courts judges as thespians sitting on their same oath beneath the same crown will find Perjury, Colusions, Conspiracy and Fraud totally acceptable and norm. If they were acting under the rule of Law this would not happen.
Commodities for profit are taken from mothers that bore them, for heartless profit and recreation.
Common Purpose despot Julia Middleton in her book refers to people as cattle.
As an emotionally charged parent attempting to make comparisons; Family Courts would be seen in the eyes of Julia Middleton and Family Court Judges as budgetary farming of human beings just as a calf is removed its mother.
I trust that anyone that has witnessed the machinery of Family Courts and relate to the growing non accidental injuries, abuse and molestation of children in care where the colour of money overtakes any remorse towards the feelings of an innocent child may share the same perception of this heartless industry for profit.
Jan 20, 2013 @ 09:41:33
It all comes down to the same thing ! In a court be -it Family, Magistrates etc.
the judge sits under the royal cipher, coat of arms, what ever you want to call it
This cipher means ” the king is present ” in the sameway that god is present
in a church or cathedral etc.
Anyone who lies in a court under that cipher is committing treason, that is why
the judge and lawyers have a convenient set of chambers next to the court room, they can lie & cheat to their hearts content in chambers, notice they
are not rooms, a judge never retires to his room but his chambers.
This means there is only one place to complain to and that is the queen, buckingham palace. do not be put off by deceit & lies it is HM Govnt. she
is in control, her MPs .Councillors, Police all swore allegiance to her personnaly
it is the queens fault children are being traded and sold and facilitated by HM Courts, by HM Judges, HM goon squad police,
Now that is the “Tactless Truth” and you will end up in an HMP. or worse
Of course the queen could be ignored by senior civil servants, the ones that
never change regardless of the election result. this queen has been there
for 50 years in complete ignorance of what is going on in her own realm.
content to rely on a corrupt civil service that steals children via hm courts
social services, they might privitice it one day like water and electricity
securicor child services etc.
Jan 20, 2013 @ 15:17:28
This queen has been there for 50 years in complete ignorance of what is going on in her own realm.
That is so very true. Why doesn’t Queenie speak up about the escalating corruption in her society, unless she herself is part and parcel of it. There is no longer any honest justice in the UK, yet it was a totally different story when Queenie came onto the throne in 1953, which is 60 years by the way, not 50.
Jan 20, 2013 @ 15:21:18
In star chambers of Family Courts judges as thespians sitting on their same oath beneath the same crown will find Perjury, Colusions, Conspiracy and Fraud totally acceptable and norm. If they were acting under the rule of Law this would not happen.
This applies to ALL courts, not just Family Courts.