SECRECY: the Cloak of Criminality? Who can do what about it?

12 06 17 secret childWhen John Hemming MP joined us at our Westminster meeting in January 2011, to explore a Public Inquiry into White Collar Crimes, I knew that ‘secret prisoners‘ were his ‘pet subject':

  • the use of the Court of ‘Protection‘ to steal the assets of mainly elderly people, by declaring them ‘not to have capacity’ to instruct solicitors
  • as a result, people are secretly imprisoned.

At the time, I did not know as much about secret family courts as I wish I  never needed to learn:

  • secret family courts are used to sanction and ‘legalise’ the child snatching carried out by Social Services – supposedly in the ‘best interest of the child’
  • I launched Stop Forced Adoptions in the UK as an online petition that non-UK MEPs want to take further in Brussels, as soon as 2,000 signatures are reached
  • I re-vamped Ian Josephs’ www.forced-adoption.com into Punishment without Crime, as he has been advising between 3 and 6 parents a day since the sixties.

Now I have seen how extra secrecy was used in a family court case: 

  • Not Open to the Media‘ it said on the listing and on the door – even though Camilla Cavendish’s campaign in The Times had achieved this tiny breakthrough: that media professionals can attend secret court hearings
  • in family courts, Harriet Harman MP said in Parliament in 2006 that 200 people had been sent to prison by family courts
  • and then there are those who are being sent secretly to mental hospitals
  • as a precursor, I know one very effective and brave former business woman who came out of prison with a ‘community treatment order‘ of a monthly injection!

We, the people, can use our courage and creativity to address this evil especially by using our computers.

MPs can use Early Day Motions that may lead to press coverage. As constituents, we can encourage our MP to sign or table issues.

Tabled by John Hemming MP – in chronological order:

The related Daily Mail article says: MP attacks head of Hacked Off campaign for acting to stifle free speech and mentions his contribution to Yvonne Goder’s case!

Some examples: tabled by George Galloway MP:

Tabled by John McDonnell MP:

Tabled by Margaret Ritchie MP:

Tabled by Lucy Powell MP:

  • ChildCare Ratios – EDM 55 about reducing staff for young children through ‘More Great ChildCare’

Tabled by Richard Shepherd MP:

About Sabine McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter.
This entry was posted in Daily Mail, John Hemming MP, Publicity and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to SECRECY: the Cloak of Criminality? Who can do what about it?

  1. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    RE:- SECRECY IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) AND HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND CHANCERY DIVISION
    ____________________________________________________________

    THE SECRECY IS NOT ONLY IN THE FAMILY DIVISION COURTS, BUT THIS IS BEFORE ALL OTHER DIVISIONS OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, IN THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (INFORMATION RIGHTS) AND THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN COMMISSIONER, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT OMBUDSMAN COMMISSIONER.

    THE BAR COUNCIL- THE GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE BAR-
    THIS BODY NEEDS TO BE ABOLISHED. SINCE THERE ARE MEMBERS OF THE BAR COUNCIL WHO ARE HAVE BEEN MISLEADING THE COURT, WHERE THEY CAUSE INJUSTICE TO OTHER CITIZENS, BEFORE ANY TRIBUNAL OR BEFORE ANY COURT OF LAW IN ANY PART OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.

    OXFORD DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE CLAIMANT
    AND
    1) THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    2) WOKINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL

    DEFENDANTS.
    CLAIM NUMBER CO_6397_2011
    BEFORE MRS JUSTICE LANG DBE
    11th APRIL 2013.

    Upon considerations of written representations from Counsel for the Claimant and Counsel for the Defendants.
    It is ordered that:-

    1) The decision of the Secretary of State for CLG dated……… be squashed.

    2) The First Defendant do pay 50% of the Claimant’s Costs,…………

    3) The First and Second Defendant’s Application for Permission to appeal is refused.

    ____________________________________________________________

    I have been directly or INDIRECTLY DISCRIMINATED BECAUSE I am not a White European Person.

    There is a judgment given in the Court of Appeal and House of Lords White V Jones 16th February 1995
    CITATION (1995) 2 AC 207, (1995) 1 AII ER 691

    PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE, ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY.

    The Judgments given in the House of Lords are binding on the Court of Appeal and all Lower Courts in the United Kingdom.

    LAZAROUS ESTATES LTD VERSUS BEASLEY PLC (1956) 1 QB 702
    FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION.
    OXFORD ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.

    THIS IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN DOCUMENT WHERE SECTION 21 OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 DOES APPLY-

    YOURS FAITHFULLY

    ISMAIL ABDULHAI BHAMJEE

    • Thank you for pointing out this secrecy level, Ismail!

      From the many victim cases I’ve seen, it could also have happened to white Europeans!

      Looking at all your comments you’ve submitted, I have difficulty grasping what it’s all about.

      In summary:

      1. Where are you at NOW?

      2. Is there still anything that’s possible / worth doing?

      Is it possible to put together:

      1. A forensic ‘analysis’ as a summary in terms of Who, What, When, Where and Why?

      2. A forensic ‘chronology’ of all the court orders and judgements?

      Keep the Faith!

  2. Jean McDonald says:

    Thank Sabine for revealing what is happening in ‘secret Courts’ to children and adults alike. I witnessed what happened to my mother – and waft is happening around me! It is all being orchestrated by the ‘cabal’ to enable them to take the assets of the elderly, thus keeping the lawyers and care homes in business, We do not realise how easy if is for the ‘authorities’ to section a person – thus putting them ‘away’ from their legal right and drug them against their wishes. We are living in a ‘controlled’ society and the church is involved.

    Blessings Jean

    Sent from my iPhone

  3. The Judicial Authorities have been corrupt by choosing to abuse the trust placed in them to administer justice according to the law. They have used discretion in a way that the law does not allow. They breached their oath of office and cover up that breach by continuing to make common law, when they have no authority to do so, and use these “judge made laws” to prevent themselves becoming answerable to the law for their actions. This way they have joined the power that separated the judiciary from the legislature and rule absolutely over Parliament and the People, in what can only be described as a Dictatorship, as they have through fraud made themselves answerable to nobody other than themselves.

    “There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of Law and in the name of Justice.” [Montesquieu]

    Trust is the essential ingredient in any relationship. The judiciary have made the mistake of trusting each other to form a unified power to control. This depends upon us trusting them and them trusting each other. However when one is negligent, the others conceal the negligence, the administration of justice is inconsistent and cannot be trusted.

    When we recognise this truth, we must recover our right to recover justice. Our first step is to gather sufficient prima facie evidence to justify the complaint. Then put the complaint to the responsible party, and upon the party’s failure or refusal to resolve the complaint, take it to the next highest authority, until this procedure exhausted.

    The People are the highest authority and no government can rule without the will of the people.

  4. JM says:

    what can you do about it?

    sinn fein/ IRA, same coin…one would have got nowhere without the other…..

    and two faced absurdiness….refuse to tell parents whe their victim is 17, but spread lies and release numerous personal information to people when their victim is a lot older? they do whatever they like to cause most damage…campaign to boycott the lot of them? i know, you will get desperate enough to try them when your house gets burgled or soembody you like or just know gets murdered or soemthing….people really are that shallow

  5. anon says:

    Lord Bingham – “the ultimate treason is for a judge to make lawful that which is unlawful”.

    unfortunately not contained in a UKHL/UKSC judgement so not binding on judges.

    • Judges think / feel / are above and beyond the law, is my impression – with very few exceptions.

      • JM says:

        ALL G-men ARE actually, not just limited to judges…it is a fact, THEY are above the law…not one of them have ever been prosecuted for rape, stealing, breaking and entering, criminal damage, assault, creeping up behind people and shotting them repeatedly in the head…obviously never going to prsoecute themselves….so continuing to talk about not going to achieve anything, never does…
        have to kill one to find out WHO they are!
        besides, when they attack you your property, somebody near you and you stand there and do nothing then you can actually be prosecuted for what they just did, it’s called Joint Enterprise. you have to physically defend yourself, it’s the law!

  6. Pingback: OPEN Corporates – a new Resource for Victims of Child Snatchers & other White Collar Criminals | Victims Unite!

  7. Pingback: HOW MANY PEOPLE know about the scandals of child ‘care’, supposed ‘protection’ and forced adoptions? | Punishment without Crime

  8. Pingback: STOP Forced Adoptions in the UK – one of many online Petitions to make a Difference | A Nigerian Family – Destroyed by Haringey Council – Gagged from Reporting

  9. Pingback: EMAIL to Madeleine Moon MP who asked about the number of children who died whilst in ‘care’ | Victims Unite!

  10. Pingback: ABOLITION of Adoptions without Parental Consent – our Petition to the European Parliament | Punishment without Crime

  11. Pingback: OPEN Rights Conference: the Right to Know and Secrecy as the Cloak of ‘reality distortion fields’ | 3D Metrics

  12. Pingback: MENTAL CAPACITY Act under Scrutiny: open for Evidence from You! | Victims Unite!

  13. Pingback: INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS about UK Law and a Barrister’s Critique of Family Courts | Punishment without Crime

  14. Pingback: VOTING with your Mouse: House of Commons Meeting for Early Day Motions and Petitions | Victims Unite!

  15. Pingback: INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS about UK Law and a Barrister’s Critique of Family Courts – Calling on MPs | Anti Oligarch

  16. 9999 The perform you’ve conducted has gotten you this much. These station replica purses are usually the clone with the reliable fabulous channel totes.
    louis vuitton purses sale http://www.landlconstructioninc.com/louis-vuitton-purses-sale-c-7.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s