SECRECY @ Home = International Concerns and Scandal: especially in Nigeria & Belgium

At the demo outside Downing StreetChristopher Booker keeps covering in The Telegraph what’s happening in Family Courts to ruin families’ lives.

Over 1,500 people signed that their secrecy should be lifted now.

In that spirit, he writes:

But The Times and the Daily Mail thought that this secrecy is being lifted by judges publishing some judgements – after secret hearings. A day later, Martin Narey claims that Family courts don’t take enough children into care, while parents and grandparents are protesting and petitioning all over the country! Look at this Dossier of Evidence!

Hence we are neither amused nor do we agree with the mainstream press. And we are far from alone. Ian Josephs, veteran watchdog of child snatching since the 1960s, writes:

“The justice dealt out  by family courts will still be vastly inferior to that of the criminal courts, until the two are bound by the same rules. In my opinion,that is precisely what should happen. I make 12 points to illustrate this:-

  1. Judges will still find “compelling reasons” not to publish controversial judgements. Their judgements are 99% in favour of local authorities so parents views will NOT be published.
  2. The public(including grandparents and relatives of parents) will still be excluded from family courts.
  3. Mothers whose babies have been taken at birth will still be threatened with jail if they” go public”. Forced adoption will uniquely in the UK continue “big time” as a major government target.
  4. More children will still be taken for emotional abuse (or risk of it !) than those removed for both sex abuse and physical abuse added together.
  5. The media will still be forbidden to name parents who want to protest openly and publicly, waive anonymity like rape victims and use their own names.
  6. Children taken into care will still have their mobiles and laptops confiscated to isolate them from family and friends. Conversation with visiting parents will still be strictly censored.
  7. Children in care receiving visits will still be forbidden to report to parents abuse by fosterers, care workers or social workers, and nearly half will still end up in jail or as sex workers.
  8. Agencies like Barnardos and N.F.A (founded by 2 social workers and sold for £130million+) will still make fortunes from recruiting fosterers and adoptive parents.
  9. Many foreign visitors who are single parents here for a holiday or to meet with relatives will if accused by uk social services of neglect etc be prevented from returning home to face social services in their homelands  and  their children will still be taken for forced adoption in the UK.
  10. Pregnant women fleeing the UK before any court proceedings start will still be tracked down in foreign countries by the SS who will often start proceedings abroad to recover the children  for forced adoption or long term fostering in the UK.
  11. Judges will continue to issue injunctions forbidding parents who have committed no crime from contacting directly or indirectly their own children for periods of many years.
  12. PUNISHMENT WITHOUT CRIME will continue to be inflicted on parents, as experts (described as hired guns in Prof Jane Ireland’s report for the government)predict risk of harm to children who are then adopted.

Nothing much will change…..

THE JUDGES KNOW THE SYSTEM IS ROTTEN BUT THEY DO NOT WANT TO REFORM.”

Furthermore:

The titles of recent articles by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph make it also clear:

And then there is the Nigerian press debating the rights of girls to be a child rather than become bride: 

Remember that the worst of all child snatching cases is the Nigerian family whose seven children were taken: five at home, one after the birth in hospital, one in prison – for the parents were sentenced to seven years imprisonment – in the most farcical of all staged court cases – with a rigged jury!

And here’s the latest video by Nigel Cooper whose daughter was kidnapped from Belgium.
 

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter.
This entry was posted in Child 'Protection', Daily Mail, Early Day Motion, Internet Media, John Hemming MP, McKenzie Friends, The Times and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to SECRECY @ Home = International Concerns and Scandal: especially in Nigeria & Belgium

  1. iSMAIL ABDULHAI BHAMJEE says:

    SINGH V MOORLANDS PRIMARY SCHOOL & READING BOROUGH COUNCIL
    COURT OF APPEAL NCN: (2003) EWCA CIV 909
    CASE NUMBER A3/2013/0614
    25th JULY 2013

    PARAGRAPH 20: THE STARTING POINT IS THAT ANY WRONG SHOULD NOT BE WITHOUT A REMEDY: AND THAT ANY EXCEPTION TO THAT BASIC PRINCIPAL OF ANY JUSTICE MUST BE NECESSARY, STRICT AND COGENT:
    ARTHUR J S HALL & CO VERSUS SIMMONS (2002) 1 AC 615, 727 (LORD HUTTON)
    JONES VERSUS KANEY (2011) UKSC 13 (2011) 2 AC 398 At (15) (LORD DYSON)
    CRAWFORD ADJUSTERS V SAGICOR GENERAL INSURANCE (CAYMAN) LTD (2013) UKPC 17 at (73) (Lord Wilson)
    AND PARAGRAPH 64 OF THE JUDGMENT:
    JAFFRAY VERSUS THE SOCIETY OF LLOYDS (2007) EWCA CIV 586
    AND
    CINPRESS GAS INJECTION LTD VERSUS MELEA LTD (2008) EWCA CIV 9
    _____________________________________________________________

    THE LORD CHANCELLOR SS MINISTRY OF JUSTICE WHO DOES HAVE THE POWERS UNDER THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM ACT 2005

    HE DOES FAIL TO TAKE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THE JUDGES THROUGH THE OFFICE FOR THE JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS.

    BHAMJEE VERSUS DAVID FORSDICK, RUEBEN TAYLOR, DAVID ELVIN QC, JAMES MAURUCI, ROBERT WALTON AND THE TREASURY SOLICITORS,
    THIS CASE WAS WRONGLY DECIDED ON THE 27TH JANUARY 2003,
    AND IN THE COURT OF APPEAL ON THE 14TH MAY 2003 AND 25TH JULY 2003 B1/B2/B3/2003/0596.
    THIS IS NOW TEN YEARS OF ROUGH AND FRAUD JUSTICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

    YOURS FAITHFULLY

    ISMAIL ABDULHAI BHAMJEE

  2. Pingback: FORCED ADOPTION in SECRET COURTS: Will MEPs Help where MPs Fear to Tread? | Punishment without Crime

  3. Nigel Cooper says:

    There is more to this story.. Please watch this video too; it implicates both the President of the U.S. and the P.M. of the UK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_-2OfOeNMM

  4. iSMAIL ABDULHAI BHAMJEE says:

    RE:- BBC NEWS- ERIC PICKLES BACKS RENTING OF DRIVEWAY WITH GUIDELINES 3rd AUGUST 2013 Last Updated 02-44.

    “This Government is standing up against Town Hall Parking Bullies and Over-Zealous Parking Enforcement.”

    The Bar Standards Board, The Bar Council, The Law Society,
    They have been concealing and suppressing Evidence the Decision of:-
    Lowe Versus The First Secretary of State and Tendering District Council
    Neutral Citation Number: (2003) EWHC 537 (Admin)
    Case Number CO-4502-2002.

    Paragraph 13 of the Judgment does mention of the Words in Oxford Dictionary.

    There are Miscarriage of Justice in the Administrative Court, Chancery Division and the Upper Tribunal.

    The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 is or has not been taken into consideration, as with the meaning of the words under Section 151 of the Senior Courts Act 1981.

    The Court of Appeal (Civil Division) is part of the High Court of Justice.
    The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) is Part of the High Court of Justice
    Section 53 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 does apply-

    Yours Faithfully

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

    • We’ve reached a stage of State crimes without punishment and people being punished without having committed crimes.

      Whether the state crime is taking your assets, your money or your children – always beyond the law.

      Whether the victimisation is theft, fraud, miscarriage of justice – always punished under the guise of the law…

  5. Pingback: FROM Prisongate to Courtgate and Judgegate? An explanation for the ‘culture’ we’re experiencing | Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

  6. Pingback: I WANT TO SING, I Want to Shout, I Want to Scream: Parents and Grandparents Unite! | Victims Unite!

  7. Pingback: I WANT TO SING, I Want to Scream, I Want to Shout: Parents and Grandparents Unite! | Anti Oligarch

  8. Pingback: DEPORTED, imprisoned and beaten for being a Parent: Sunday Telegraph | Melissa Laird

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s