RETURN Our Stolen Children! – What Can We Do? – Our Battle against Judges who ignore the Law

David Jenkins, the organiser of Stolen Children of the UK [S.C.O.T. UK] the 8-day demo outside Downing Street in July 2013 is now in HMP Swansea.

He has had 4 children taken and handed in signatures with a petition that was published in Hansard on 03 September 2013: Children Placed in Foster Care.

Dear Mr Cameron, take the Lead and Return our Stolen Children was the cover letter of our file.

David is now in prison for having named one of the Social Workers involved, even though Lord Justice Munby has made this breakthrough judgement in which he appeals to courts to adapt to the realities of the internet, particularly social media! That includes naming Social Workers!

BUT: as Christopher Booker writes in The Telegraph: Why do our judges in family courts ignore the law? — How can any sane judge decide that a child should remain in ‘care’ of a blind 80-year old widow? Is it coincidence that it’s the same judge who decided that it is up to the ‘discretion of Barnet Council’ whether there should be any contact between a 4-year-old boy and his mother? He has not seen her since December 2011 and she has been deported so that he can be adopted

It is our and Lord Justice Munby’s battle against judges who don’t obey the Law of the Land. No wonder, Belinda McKenzie writes regular Battle News for Britain’s children.

Meanwhile we handed out this leaflet at today’s Empowerment Monday:

RETURN our STOLEN CHILDREN[1]

Parents and Supporters at Empowerment Mondays[2]
and via a Petition in the House of Commons[3]

Social Services take children off their parents for all sorts of frivolous reasons, such as ‘risk of emotional harm’. They hide behind the secrecy of Family Courts[4] who sanction the wrong doing.

What’s unique in the UK[5] is horrendous: gagging orders threaten with imprisonment and actually commit parents wrongfully. Especially foreigners and other vulnerable people such as those brought up in ‘care’ homes. One prisoner was brought up in 13 homes, abused in 2 and had her 4 children taken at birth. One US mother was deported to be homeless whilst her son is kept for adoption[6].

Forced adoptions[7] take place without parental consent. One mother grieves for her sons who were adopted by a gay couple. Parents are punished without having committed any crime[8].

In ‘contact’ sessions, children are not allowed to speak in their own language and parents are not allowed to tell them that they love them.

WHAT CAN WE DO?

Parents must join others to know that it’s not their fault. They can sign Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent[9] – a petition before the EU Parliament – and look at the 10-page Dossier of Evidence[10] with links to many Facebook groups.

Supporters can provide ‘tea and sympathy’ besides making placards and generally spreading the word. With the exception of Christopher Booker in The Telegraph, the mainstream media tend not to cover the issue. Local Councils do NOT like public exposure. One father got his son back after 14 months of campaigning. Two Slovak boys[11] were returned after demos outside the UK Embassy with TV and press.

McKenzie Friends[12] are lay legal advisors who know about the badness of the situation. Solicitors and barristers tend to be ‘professional losers’ as this barrister[13] said who fled to Israel to save her daughters from Barnet Council.

John Hemming (Lib Dem) is the only MP who consistently tries to make changes. Getting your MP to talk to him is a first step for support.

For further information, please FOLLOW www.victims-unite.net


About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter.
This entry was posted in Child 'care', Child 'Protection', Empowerment Mondays, Empowerment Mondays, Empty Pushchair Horrors, Facebook, Family Courts, Lawful Protest, McKenzie Friends and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to RETURN Our Stolen Children! – What Can We Do? – Our Battle against Judges who ignore the Law

  1. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    RE:- THE CRIME AND COURTS ACT 2013
    ____________________________________

    I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee of 196 Tiptree Crescent, Ilford, Essex IG5 OST, Tell 0203-6010-417 refer to David Jenkins demo at 10 Downing Street.

    1. The Crime and Courts Act 2013, This has made some changes to the United Kingdom Legislation. He should have petitioned to the Lord Chancellor SS Ministry of Justice and Other Ministers in his Department that the Sections which has not come into force should be brought into force.

    2. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005, There was the Office for the Judicial Complaints where the name has been changed very recently from October 2013.
    The Word: MAL-ADMINISTRATION this has been left out in the Rules.

    There is a time limit for a period of three Months to make a complaint to the Office for the Judicial Complaints which does has a New Name.

    3. The Lord Chancellor SS Ministry of Justice has recently issued a consultation paper on Judicial Review-
    People should make their submissions to the Lord Chancellor-
    Since there is a Time Limit for a period of Six Weeks in Judicial Review-

    There is a Legal Right to bring a Private Law Claim on a Judicial Review Claim by Virtue of Section 31 (4) of the Senior Courts Act 1981-

    If a person is going to make or Issue a Claim in the Queens Bench Division, than His or Her Claim is going to be dismissed as an abuse of Process of the Court or being Vexatious Application, when it is not a Vexatious Application or Claim. The Court does have the Power to transfer from One Division to another Division-

    If a Person is a Litigant in Person, than this is going to be dismissed, unless a person does instruct a QC Barrister.

    4. The Legal Aid and Advice, England and Wales-
    Statutory Instrument 2013 No 2814 The amendments comes into force on the 2nd December 2013.
    and Statutory Instrument 2013 No 614.

    It is open for a person to make an Application for Funding before the High Court and also before the Crown Court, The Magistrates Court and the Court of Appeal Criminal Division.

    5. The Words “Mackenzie Friend” This has been changed under the Schedule 3 of the Legal Services Act 2007 as it does state a Person.

    6. The Independent Police Complaints Commission has recently issued proceedings for Judicial Review against the Commissioner for the Metropolis as this has been reported in the Independent by Paul Peachey as reported on Thursday, 10th October 2013.
    I don’t know the claim number where it is open for any person Non-Party to obtain copies of the Claim Form.
    Since there has been Harassment by other Police Officers in the United Kingdom delays over investigating detention of Innocent Muslims.

    The Same should apply to other persons whose children have been taken away by the Local Authority.

    I request that other members of the Public should support the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

    7. I request that David Jenkins should petition to the Prime Minister that the Independent Police Complaints Commission should be given the Power to carry out the arrest and Investigations against the Offenders or Suspected Offenders who are or may be at large.

    The DPP, Crown Prosecution Services, should be allowed to take reports direct from the members of the Public.

    8. I don’t have the Power to amend, vary and revoke the versus in the Holy Quran or those in the Christian Bible or of any other Religion.
    Article 9 Freedom of Religion and Conscience is allowed in any part of the United Kingdom and it is only a High Court Judge who has the Power to make a declaration, where the Master, Deputy High Court Judge and District Judge may not try the claim. The meaning of the words “may not try”

    I thank you in advance and wait to hear from you

    Yours Faithfully

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee.

  2. peter oakes says:

    Judges are the law ! Britain has been hi-jacked in a creeping coup by the
    “legal mafia” made up of lawyers, barristers, civil servants?. senior police,
    and other so-called worthies that are in fact corrupted freemasons, just
    google: Gorsey Hey masonic home to see how this mafia stole honest Masons
    assets from their charities !

    The Charities Commission in Liverpool agreed the Law had been broken and
    despite Hansard record shewing house of commons debate no action has
    been forthcoming YET ! So the ” Law makers ” in the “Commons ” turn
    a blind eye to criminality carried out by the mafia !

    Treason has taken place, and parliamentary democracy only exists in the mind
    of a secretly enslaved people, who sit back and allow jimmy saville and his
    associates to carry on abusing children, the odd thing is only members of the entertainers and actors have been arrested at present surely a social worker or member of the legal mafia has been involved, after all the whole process of child stealing is to remove the criminal kidnapping ! and that needs lawyers !

    Did you see ? the Guardian 1 Nov. Home Repossessions Chester County
    Court leads the country with a ratio of 8.4 or (961) nearly double the next
    highest at 4.5 or (570). ( that is 8.4 per 1000 households) You need
    lawyers to repossess homes it,s a nice “little earner ” easy money !

    No doubt this court will lead the “child stealing” cum kidnapping league after
    all this is barrister and MP Edward Timpsons patch ! You know the one the
    Childrens Minister who is fully aware of criminal conduct in this court !

    Please ,Please do not waste your time studying the law ! at the end of the day
    it is you in Court facing one or three judges and if they are bent you will
    loose regardless of what the law says ! if you disagree you will be made a
    Vexatious Litigant, declared medically disturbed and sectioned re: Mental
    Health Act. or you will be maliciously bankrupted. After 20 years observation
    I know what I am talking about !

  3. forcedadoption says:

    “The standard that must be met by the prosecution’s evidence in a criminal prosecution: that no other logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendant committed the crime, thereby overcoming the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty.”
    The legal dictionary defines above the standard of proof needed in criminal cases and when prison is contemplated that should be the standard of proof in civil or contempt cases.

    In all the recent cases where parents or relatives denied knowing where the children were situated there was the perfectly logical explanation that they could be telling the truth !Prison was therefore WRONG; I often help pregnant women to escape the UK to avoid forced adoption and I strongly advise them never to reveal to their relatives where they intend to go and to make contact later only by email and never by phone or letter .These relatives should then be able quite truthfully to say that they do not know where that mother or her children have gone ;hopefully thus (sometimes in vain) avoiding prison for failing to reveal information they never had in the first place !

    Of course Court Orders should be obeyed and contact should be enforced by penal measures if necessary.The court however should NEVER issue “no contact orders” that are as inhumane as they are illegal.There exists no statute or delegated legislation that empowers a judge to forbid a mother (or father) who has committed no crime against children, from contacting her child even by email or phone and such orders breach both human rights and the UN convention as well as being without any legal foundation !

    “Non molestation orders” are of course quite legal but were clearly designed to protect one person from harassment or violence from another person.The word “molest” is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as “to intentionally annoy” and only those perverse old men in wigs calling themselves judges could interpret the word in such a way as to prevent a mother and daughter having any contact whatever !Prison for sending a birthday card for example because they claim that is “molestation”!Twisting the Enlish language to enable themselves to vent their own spleen !That is what happened to Vicky Haigh who was actually sentenced to three years prison for saying hello to her daughter at what could only have been an accidental meeting when the father drove in to fill up at a petrol station near Vicky’s houseand had his daughter in the car.
    This fact was cleverly obscured by judge Wall who talked at great length to the
    press about how she had coached her daughter to accuse her father of sex abuse as though she was being sentenced for that; when in fact Vicky was imprisoned for opening the car door and saying hello! There followed “Three years in the slammer !” (reduced by 5 months on appeal)

  4. peter oakes says:

    All very well in a democratic country ! There are No Human Rights in the UK !
    The UK never signed up-to the European Convention of Human Rights

    The UK ignored Article 1. that states ” The following Articles are binding on the
    signatories.” and worst of all Article 13 ” The Right to a remedy ” is missing
    from the UK Human Rights Act of 1999, in force 2000.

    UK Mafia judges know full well the Human Rights Act is a sick joke on their
    slaves, but they are s—t scared joe public will google: ECHR and then
    google: UK Human Rights Act. the Truth is there for all to see !

    the mafia rule OK !

  5. peter oakes says:

    As further confirmation of parliament ignoring criminal offences and
    assisting offenders please Google: Appendix 9 royal masonic hospital

  6. Pingback: DO JUDGES park their conscience or put it on hold? | Melissa Laird

  7. Pingback: BELINDA’s BATTLE for Britain’s Children – 10 November 2013 | Punishment without Crime

  8. Pingback: BATTLE for Britain’s Children – 10 November 2013 | Anti Oligarch

  9. Pingback: LEGAL AID lawyer, secret courts and social workers collude(d) to adopt (two) boys | Punishment without Crime

  10. Pingback: BARRISTER’S ADVICE: speak badly about your husband to get your children back | The Pedro Family: five children snatched by Lincoln County Council without paper work

  11. Pingback: PETITION NUMBER 1707/2013 – first step for tabling in the Committee of the EU Parliament | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  12. Pingback: APPEAL HEARING on 06 December – with or without the prisoners? | A Nigerian Family – Destroyed by Haringey Council – Gagged from Reporting

  13. Pingback: COURT HEARINGS in December illustrate how the UK’s ‘child protection’ system is an international scandal | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  14. Pingback: WE CAN send you to jail for objecting to an offence we’ve yet to specify | The Pedro Family: five children snatched by Lincoln County Council without paper work

  15. Pingback: PRESS RELEASE about the UK Delegation in Brussels to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s