RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE in Police and Judiciary? Only with the aid of Experienced Investigators!

14 02 05 EU Anti-CorruptionEnough is enough! People see through the spin, charades and farcical fob-offs.

They are taking their power back:

  • www.ExposedPolice.com publishes News, Corruption and Misconduct
  • www.upsd.co.uk – the unProfessional Standards Department of West Yorkshire Police is a group of experienced investigators who have come together to fight police incompetence, misconduct or criminality that lead to miscarriages of justice.

By way of example, here’s a copy of an email to all MPs:

Commission unveils first EU Anti-Corruption Report

For each of these areas, the Report suggests solutions, based on a careful assessment of each Member State. They include:

  • better accountability and integrity standards;
  • control mechanisms in public authorities;
  • dealing with conflicts of interests by officials;
  • how to address corruption at local level and in state-owned companies
  • the effectiveness of courts and police, and protection mechanisms for whistleblowers;
  • limiting risks of bribery in foreign countries, and making lobbying more transparent;
  • And – developing innovative e-tools to enhance transparency.

The Report also takes a close look at corruption in public procurement. One fifth of the EU’s GDP is spent every year in public procurement of goods and services, and this is essential to our economies. But it is also an area which is vulnerable to corruption: studies suggest that up to a quarter of the value of public contracts in EU Member States may be lost to corrupt practices.

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-89_en.htm

The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-corruption-of-britain-uks-key-institutions-infiltrated-by-criminals-9052617.html

West Yorkshire Police Standards

http://www.upsd.co.uk/

 Kenneth Clarke MP, Minister without portfolio, is Britain’s Anti-Corruption Champion, reporting to David Cameron MP, Prime Minister.

 Europe must ‘walk the walk’ on corruption – Mo Ibrahim

Source: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 09:08 PM   Author: Luke Balleny

http://www.trust..org/item/20140204210848-fyo5a/

Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)

My Lords, did not the Lord Chief Justice urge police chiefs to give urgent—I stress that word—consideration to a practice that undermined the reputation of the police for independence? He was deeply concerned about it. Those are serious observations; they come from an impeccable source, do they not?

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2014-02-04a.92.4&s=police#g94.0

What a state of affairs when UK subjects need to seek ‘judiciary refuge’ in Brussels – from corruption in the Police and Judiciary – that goes as far as having to demand Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent.

Meanwhile, the Government announces: Criminals to pay towards costs of running courts

Since Justice Secretary Chris Grayling wants to deliver ‘efficiency for the taxpayer’, maybe he’ll support the Bradbury Pound as the obvious solution: debt- and interest-free ‘treasury money‘ to pay for public services rather than interest-bearing ‘bank money‘ that serves only banksters?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter.
This entry was posted in Child 'care', Child 'Protection', Judges, Law Enforcement, Parliament, Police, Police state, Prison, Rule of Law, White-Collar Crimes, White-Collar Criminals and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE in Police and Judiciary? Only with the aid of Experienced Investigators!

  1. gwenarathoon@gmail.com says:

    Totally agree
    Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone

  2. Anonymous says:

    And, Local Authorities!
    This article comes to mind.
    “Our officers are innocent until proven guilty, say Carmarthenshire County Council’s Cabinet”

    http://www.southwalesguardian.co.uk/news/10983637.Our_officers_are_innocent_until_proven_guilty__say_Carmarthenshire_County_Council__39_s_Cabinet/?ref=eb

    and I will end with the words of Lord Denning
    “A public body must not misuse its power And it is a misuse of power for it to act unlawfully or unjustly towards a private citizen where there is no overriding public interest to warrant it.”

  3. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND COURTS BILL (HC BILL 169)

    THIS BILL DOES MAKE SOME CHANGES TO SECTION 31 OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981-

    SECTION 107, 108, 109 OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990, AND SECTION 1 (3) (IV) OFFICES, SHOPS AND RAILWAY PREMISES ACT 1963 HAS BEEN LEFT OUT.

    I REFER TO THE CARMARTHENSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL COMMENTS-

    THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM THEY DO HAVE A COPY OF THE STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 1987 NO 765 WHICH HAS BEEN REPEALED-
    AND STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 1995 NO 297
    CLASS B1
    CLASS B2
    CLASS B8 STORAGE

    HOW DO THEY CLAIM THAT THERE ARE INNOCENT UNTIL THERE ARE FOUND GUILTY BY THE COURT- SINCE THERE HAS BEEN SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE- REFUSING TO DISCLOSE INFORMATION-
    AS ANY CITIZEN HAS THE RIGHT TO TAKE PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS.

    TRIAL BY SINGLE JUSTICE ON THE PAPERS: SENTENCING, ETC
    IN SECTION 121 OF THE MAGISTRATES COURTS ACT 1980

    Insert “(5A) A Magistrates Court that is trying a summary offence in accordance with section 16A is restricted to the following in dealing with the accused for the offence-

    (a) imposing a fine;

    (b) imposing a penalty under section 102 (3) (aa) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 or

    Section 29, 35A OR 37 OF THE VEHICLE EXCISE AND REGISTRATION ACT 1994 (PENALTIES IMPOSED FOR CERTAIN OFFENCES IN RELATION TO VEHICLE EXCISE LICENSES)

    as there are other paragraphs mentioned.

    Schedule 45 of the Finance Act 2008 is already into force-

    Yours Faithfully

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

  4. peter oakes says:

    A Private Citizen does have the Right to start a criminal prosecution !
    the process is to “lay an information” before a “bench” of magistrates (crooks)
    I have layed an information, had “summons,s” issued But when it comes
    to the next stage the court simply dismisses the prosecution because the
    lord chancellors dept. orders them to prevent private prosecutions !

    Simple,s the corruption is endemic and the Govnt. is frightened to death the “sheeples” will find out that the RBS Bank they now own is worthless !
    it has been looted by the crooks that stole small business,s by use of
    the Insolvency Service re: bogus & malicious bankruptcies

    The Treasury Select Committee is now in Stuck ! re; the Tomlinson report.

    I suggest you read ” I am satisfied ” in the permanent pages on the right hand
    side of these comments. Judge Davinson. at Chesterfield was an honorable
    honest man, he was ordered not to issue “summonses” by the LC,s dept.
    has he says ” I am satisfied he has suffered cruelly over a number of years”

    and that is torture ! life imprisonment. Offences against the person.
    Criminal Justice Act. 1984. Torture is endemic in the UK contrary to
    Article 3. ECHR. cruel. degrading (bankrupting) in-human treatment the
    UK is rotten!

  5. Christopher Barrs says:

    Dear Victims Unite I am currently trying to press the police to investigate a crime committed by the land registry and a member of the public. I have documented proof that the land registry suppressed information in our case before the land registry adjudicator. This allowed the respondent to also suppress information and commit perjury and fraud. This involves Devon and Cornwall police, the matter was passed to a DS DeReya who, although I telephoned in the region of 15-20 times, leaving messages with colleagues and on her answer service, never once responded to me. The matter was then passed to a DI Beer, exactly the same outcome involving never answered telephone calls. I then received a letter from Mr Beer saying that it would be taken no further due to a lack of evidence! The man never spoke to me, certainly never met me and never gave me the chance to show him the evidence. This would involve a white collar crime and the police do not want to investigate, they are not interested in the fact that I have cast iron proof of this crime. Mr Christopher Barrs twitter @LandRegCriminal 0188435199 07703883082

    • Dear Mr Barrs

      All I can say is “you’re not alone”…

      Your twitter handle is EXCELLENT! I’m glad you’re inviting others on this particular kind of white collar crime to join you!

      May they help with your EXPOSURE, EXPOSURE, EXPOSURE.

      You just have to ‘keep at it’ and become more and more philosophical about your challenges.

      Ultimately, it’s the image of the UK Establishment that is at stake. The best way I see forward for all these organisations that are supposedly operating in the ‘public interest’ is to provide amnesty, jubilee and COMPENSATION.

      Meanwhile, look at the photo of what Maurice Kirk wrote on the wall of his veterinary surgery whilst fighting for decades: http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

      Keep the faith and your spirit up!!!

  6. peter oakes says:

    To Christopher Barrs.
    Write to the Crime Commissioner for your area and
    put your letter up on “comments” Victims Unite. Let the Commissioner
    know there is no ” hiding place ” anymore we the people will expose deliberate
    criminal conduct by the authorities police, courts, judges, who-ever and
    where-ever we are sick to the back teeth with this cancer of corruption !

    Make your complaint and If you need anymore evidence the Land Registry
    is involved in concealing the theft of properties myself and Mr.Ebert. have
    the information to prove beyond any doubt the police and govnt. agencies
    conspire to pervert justice and to conceal offences and downright incompetence that is in fact gross negligence ( an offence itself)

    I will forward it to where-ever you direct recorded delivery

    enough is enough !

    • I seriously wonder how many ‘rotten apples’ are involved. I certainly have come across all possible institutions – from land registry to councils, the tax inspector to barristers, judges and social services.

      • Anonymous says:

        The govnt. and all its depts. are corrupted. somewhere there is a Grand Master pulling the strings of Civil Servant puppets.

        All of them conspire to secretly enslave the british public, Alex Salmond
        now wants to scottish independence so that the scotish legal
        mafia get more of the spoils and loot see:( scotland against crooked lawyers)

        this is scottish rite freemasonary at work !!! and they are reall bad b——s

  7. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    RE:- COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (INCLUDING COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE DECISIONS)

    http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/EUECJ/2014/C53011.html

    cite as: (2014) EUECJ C-5301/11
    13th February 2014.
    ______________________________________________________________

    Please see the above transcript of the Judgment.

    There is the European Communities Act 1972
    Section 1 (4)
    Section 2 (1)
    Section 3 (1).

    and The Interpretation Act 1978.

    The Barristers Instructed by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland by C. Murrell, and Subsequently by Mr Holt, Acting as Agents, and by J. Mauruci, Barrister.

    Mr James Mauruci with David Elvin QC had appeared in the High Court of Justice Administrative Court at the Directions hearing on the 25th October 2000 before than Mr Justice Scot Baker.

    The Transcript of the Proceedings and Judgment has not been published on the Bailii Web Site.

    Section 11 (a) (b) of the Human Rights Act 1998
    Section 2 (1) of the European Communities Act 1972
    This has been argued-

    The Law of Res-Judicata and Estoppel does apply-

    2nd Application is an Abuse of the Process of the Court-

    So who has been abusing the Process of the Court?

    I thank you in advance and wait to hear from you

    Yours Faithfully

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

  8. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    INFORMATION COMMISSIONER DECISION NOTICE 17TH MARCH 2014
    REFERENCE NUMBER FS50520770.
    SECTION 14 (1) OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000.
    THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER OFFICERS HAVE BEEN BIAS AGAINST ME.
    SECTION 63 (1) OF THE FREEDOM OF THE INFORMATION ACT 2000
    COURT ORDERS ARE NOT EXEMPT INFORMATION

    I AM NOW SEEKING ASSISTANCE FROM THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC FOR FUNDING FOR A QC BARRISTER TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION OF THE COURT TO BRING CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE OFFICERS IN THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER’S OFFICE

    YOURS FAITHFULLY

    ISMAIL ABDULHAI BHAMJEE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s