WHEN JUSTICE VANISHES and the Rule of Law erodes, Self-Help arrives thanks to the net

Institute of Race Relations

Institute of Race Relations (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Amazing, there is secrecy where there could be transparency:

1. Secrecy in Family Courts

  • we’ve long campaigned and petitioned and Sir James Munby has made the difference
  • Belinda McKenzie attended the hearing on 23 May 2014 in Watford where HHJ Parker announced proudly on behalf of her colleagues that this was a ‘public’ hearing of a family court;

2. Justice vanishes: the Erosion of the Rule of Law is an article published by the Institute of Race Relations. I received the link from mojuk AT mojuk.org.uk – John O provides this News Service about Miscarriages of Justice in the UK (MOJUK). It refers to

  • a criminal court hearing being heard in secret – presumably not the one and only one
  • secret evidence – presumably not the first time either
  • and secrecy in inquests – which is something I’ve come across before as well.

But who cares???

Help4Lips do! They help Litigants in Person (LiPs) stay out of court by giving access to information: 

About these ads

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician, software designer, system analyst, event organiser, independent web publisher and online promoter.
This entry was posted in Family Courts, Internet Media, McKenzie Friends, Ministry of Justice, Rule of Law, Secrecy and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to WHEN JUSTICE VANISHES and the Rule of Law erodes, Self-Help arrives thanks to the net

  1. I am very sorry to say Sabine but my own thoughts and knowing full well how governments work Sir Munby perhaps is or was a front so that the British people who have always been known as the sheep sit back and think things will change oh because Sir Munby said so, what about the gagging orders already on the families I have written and asked no reply so the gagging orders stay,, and with more fostering and adoptions on the rise nothing will change as the saying goes watch this space.
    Maggie

  2. Pingback: WHEN JUSTICE VANISHES and the Rule of Law erodes, Self-Help arrives thanks to the net |

  3. JM says:

    I care, not that I can do anything about it.

  4. Leonard Lawrence Pilot says:

    Cdr Joe Turner Royal Navy Rtd
    Chief Executive
    1 Garden Court Chambers

    Mr Turner

    16 April 2012 Leonard Lawrence SL03D00938
    His Honour Judge Simon Oliver, Reading County Court.
    THE JUDGE: It actually says in there, “We have to refer this to the Court of Protection”.

    1. Following my email dated: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:54:36 we have now spoken this afternoon at 16:25hr Fri, 27 Jun 2014

    2. Mr Turner you advise that Janet Bazley QC, Caroline Willbourne and members of 1 Garden Court will not disclose Caroline Willbourne “ADVICE TO THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ON THE MERITS OF AN APPEAL BY THE
    HUSBAND FOR THE PUBLIC FUNDING PURPOSES” dated 15 September 2005

    3. Mr Turner in September 2005 at least three Court of Protection medical certificates of mental incapacity CP3’s were sent, or were available, to 1 Garden Court Chambers together with the record of barrister Simon Calhaem 29 Bedford Row Chambers assertion to Reading County Court that Laurence Oates Official Solicitor to the Supreme Court had not agreed the sale value of 38 Dukes Wood Avenue.

    4. 29 Bedford Row Chambers have made a full disclosure.

    5. 1 Kings Bench Walk Chambers have made a disclosure.

    6. The Law Society have made a full disclosure (with encouragement from a Detective Chief Superintendent)

    10. Mr Turner with respect as the Royal Navy’s former lead lawyer for Service Inquiries, investigations, and legal training do you not question why I am not being given sight of Caroline Willbourne “ADVICE TO THE OFFICIAL SOLICITOR ON THE MERITS OF AN APPEAL BY THE HUSBAND FOR THE PUBLIC FUNDING PURPOSES” dated 15 September 2005, given that Caroline Willbourne advised the Bar Standard Board that I had recovered mental capacity prior to my home being sold in August 2005 when the Court of
    Protection CP2 certificate of mental capacity was only issued in 2006.

    Yours sincerely

    Leonard Lawrence
    Royal Navy Rtd

  5. This was not a precedent. In mine and my partners civil Trial of a convicted criminal in the family courts in bournemouth, the Judge decided that the trial would be heard publicly, ours is the precedent.

  6. I neglected to mention, our trial of him was in 2010.

  7. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    RE:- CIVIL PROCEDURE ACT 1997:
    SCHEDULE 1. CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES

    APPLICATION OF OTHER RULES

    5 (1) CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES MAY APPLY ANY RULES OF COURT WHICH RELATE TO A COURT WHICH IS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES.

    (3) In this paragraph “Rules of Court” includes any provision governing the practice and procedure of a court which is made by or under an Enactment.

    (4) Where Civil Procedure Rules may be made by applying other Rules, the other rules may be applied-

    (a) to any extent,

    (b) with or without modification, and

    (c) as amended from time to time.

    ______________________________________________________________

    THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2014
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2014 NO 1610
    THIS SHALL COME INTO FORCE FROM OCTOBER 2014.

    PART 7 STARTING A PROSECUTION IN A MAGISTRATES COURT.

    PART 14.

    SOME OF THE WORDS WHICH HAVE BEEN REPEALED UNDER THE CORONERS AND JUSTICE ACT 2009 HAVE BEEN LEFT OUT-

    ____________________________________________________________

    I REQUEST THAT THE ABOVE SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY PERSONS:-

    A) WHO HAVE BEEN ISSUED WITH CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDERS BEFORE ANY COURT IN ANY PART OF THE UNITED KINGDOM SINCE CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDERS REMAIN IN FORCE FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS UNLESS EXTENDED FOR ANOTHER PERIOD NOT EXCEEDING TWO YEARS.

    B) PERSONS WHO ARE ON THE LIST OF VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS UNDER
    SECTION 42 OF THE SCA 1981 BETWEEN THE 1ST JANUARY 1999 AND THE LAST ORDER MADE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT.
    SECTION 27 (7) (8a) OF THE COURTS AND LEGAL SERVICES ACT 1990
    AND NOW SECTION 192 OF THE LEGAL SERVICES ACT 2007

    C) PERSONS WHERE THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER HAS ISSUED DECISIONS UNDER SECTION 14 OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000-
    SINCE THE PROTECTION OF FREEDOMS ACT 2012 DOES MAKE SOME CHANGES TO SECTION 11 OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000.

    There is no fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention Treaties before the Information Commissioner’s Office-
    As the Solicitor and Counsel/Barrister does commit an Offence under Section 1 of the Criminal Attempt Act 1981
    OBSTRUCT OR LIKELY TO ATTEMPT AND OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.

    YOURS FAITHFULLY

    ISMAIL ABDULHAI BHAMJEE

  8. Pingback: REPORTING PAEDOPHILIA to the Home Office whilst #childsnatchuk leads to #paedobritain | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s