WHOM DO YOU ASK for help when the State bullies you for whistleblowing on paedophilia – especially once imprisoned?

20 Comments

14 07 23 from Hillsborough to Lambeth Front coverFirst I saw the fraudulent imprisonment of Vicky Haigh when I acted as McKenzie Friend for her, together with Liz Watson who was also sent to prison on fabricated charges. Vicky had asked Social Services for help with the abuse her daughter was experiencing from her father.

  • First lesson learned: never ever ask Social Services for help!
  • Daddy does things to me he shouldn’t, and now I can’t see mummy any more.
  • The rest is a network of corrupt guys at the right place in the right institution…

Then I saw Gloria and Chiwar Musa being imprisoned as two of the some 200 parents who are sent to prison by secret family courts every year, as Harriet Harman admitted in Parliament in 2006.

  • Second lesson: never think you can trust a judge, jury or another judge, let alone the Social Workers, Police Officers, lawyers and NHS staff involved.
  • The eldest daughter was molested by the son of her foster carer.
  • The second daughter told her mum that they were taken to dark places at night where there are only men.
  • The son asked: mummy, what is paedophilia?

Then we visited Melissa Laird in HMP Holloway. She had been advised to plead guilty to get her son back.

And we saw how prison conditions in HMP Holloway are just as bad as in HMP Cardiff for Maurice Kirk – especially to stop Litigants in Person from advancing their case. At the same time, it is impossible to get trustworthy lawyers. And now not even Legal Aid.

  • Next lesson: Complaint procedures don’t result in anything.
  • HMP Governors hide behind communication walls and Police or Prison Inspectors are not responsible or find other excuses.

The latest ‘cri de coeur’ comes from whistleblower Brian Pead who now calls himself William Brian Freeman. He has been in 5 prisons since 14 May 2014.

So I wrote: Dear Sir or Madam More

KEEP CALM and Challenge Britain: Foreign and UK Children Back for Christmas!

24 Comments

Among the women whose children are targeted for ‘care’ and forced adoption are foreigners who often get criminalised and imprisoned, such as the Nigerian Musas and American Melissa Laird.

Most of them can’t cope with the barrage of paper work on top of the bereavement of being separated from their children.

For what’s unique in the UK is institutionalised child snatching aka state kidnapping – for forced adoption or punishment without crime.

However, when I heard how this Portuguese family was deprived of its five children by Lincoln County Council, this was the opportunity to ask for all UK and foreign Children Back for Christmas!

Brave UK Kellie Cottam has already put Home for Christmas together.

Among the remarkable foreigners is Latvian Laila Brice who says DON’T ADOPT MY DAUGHTER. Thanks to her Latvian MEP, her petition to the EU Parliament is tabled for 19 March 2014. Katya & Mummy. April 2012

Thanks to her initiative, our collective petition with currently over 2,500 signatures to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent will be presented in Brussels on that occasion, too.

Laila writes:

MERTON. I AM NOT FEARFUL. YOU KNOW FOR SURE I AM YOUR WORST ENEMY. LET’S TAKE IT EASY. AND CLEAR:

  1. Clara Masenda (Social Worker),
  2. Nicole Miller (Assessment Team Manager),
  3. Jane Mukiri (Social Worker),
  4. Sarah Turner (LAC Team manager),
  5. Sammy Forbes (LAC Team Manager),
  6. Joan Williams-Paine (LAC Team manager),
  7. Nick Rumball (LAC Team manager),
  8. June Lewis ( Guardian CAFCASS),
  9. RUTH WILKISON (LAC Team SW),
  10. Daphne Matthews (Merton Court Team Assessment SW) ,
  11. Jane Farrer (Post Adoption support SW),
  12. Andrea Watkins (Merton Adoption Agency SW),
  13. Eva Lendcey (Merton Adoption Agency Manager) ,
  14. Derek Blincow (Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist appointed by CAFCASS),
  15. Nicolas Silva (The Medical Adviser for Merton Permanency & Adoption Panel). More

THREE POSITIVE Judgements by Sir James Munby and 4,000 Financial Ombudsmen (and -women)

10 Comments

13 10 25 Jail Social WorkersIt is too soon to sing Hallelujah, but here are two stories in one week that make our hearts sing and our hands applaud Sir James Munby:

  1. Jail social workers who take children without telling parents why, says Britain’s top family judge
    * Sir James Munby attacked workers in Bristol who didn’t explain themselves
    * They did not tell a couple why their two children were being taken from them
    * They breach a court order in doing so – which could carry a jail term in future
  2. MP [John Hemming of course] condemns secret justice
    * Strange that no other paper has reported this yet…
  3. Courts should adapt to the realities of the internet, particularly social media
    * I just wish that this judgement was taken on board by every judge in the country!

On the other end of the spectrum of white collar crimes, I met last night two of the 4,000 Financial Ombudsmen who have been set up by the financial industry as alternatives to court – and they are free of charge! Once you’re in court, they don’t help, it seems. Also, when cases are too big, i.e. worth more than £100,000. Well, they do have to protect themselves, don’t they, these brethren. A seasoned fighter tells me about the ‘conflicts of interest’ of senior board members…

Apparently, they grew exponentially over the last two years AND they get financial institutions to pay compensation! They also uphold far more complaints than they refuse. So give them a chance, I’d say!

Wouldn’t it be nice if there were as many Legal Ombudsmen (and -women) around – free of charge – instead of lawyers riding the Legal Aid train???

OUT OF HOLLOWAY: at what cost? With what damages and what irreparable traumas?

9 Comments

Melissa Laird is the US mother who was deported on 12 September whilst her child is kept for adoption. She received her Deportation Order made on 29 November 2012 on 12 December 2012 in Holloway prison. This delay in post going in and out seems to be standard for prisoners who try to defend themselves and act as Litigants in Person.

In fact, it is utterly amazing, if anybody succeeds with any litigation whilst ‘inside’. I have not only seen this first hand with Melissa but also with Maurice Kirk, the flying vet who has been exceptionally bullied and harassed and extremely damaged by South Wales Police and the Director of Caswell Clinic.

Melissa was dumped in Dulles Airport Washington – without ‘reception and rehabilitation’ as would have been required by law. But the Rule of Money has long replaced the Rule of Law in the family courts, it seems.

Her son has not seen his mum since 13 December 2011, when he was 4 years old. For anybody to claim it’s in the child’s best interest, is farcical, to put it mildly. No proper assessment of the child’s best interest has taken place anyhow. But it’s much more fun for Social Workers to travel to Spain to gather ‘evidence’ and justify their child snatching by presenting a ‘paper reality’ to judges who sanction ‘on paper’ whatever separates children from their parents and grandparents – for the sake of sex, money or both…

How to stop cover up is the real issue addressed by John Hemming MP on Channel IV news:

More

SECRECY @ Home = International Concerns and Scandal: especially in Nigeria & Belgium

12 Comments

At the demo outside Downing StreetChristopher Booker keeps covering in The Telegraph what’s happening in Family Courts to ruin families’ lives.

Over 1,500 people signed that their secrecy should be lifted now.

In that spirit, he writes:

But The Times and the Daily Mail thought that this secrecy is being lifted by judges publishing some judgements – after secret hearings. A day later, Martin Narey claims that Family courts don’t take enough children into care, while parents and grandparents are protesting and petitioning all over the country! Look at this Dossier of Evidence!

Hence we are neither amused nor do we agree with the mainstream press. And we are far from alone. Ian Josephs, veteran watchdog of child snatching since the 1960s, writes:

“The justice dealt out  by family courts will still be vastly inferior to that of the criminal courts, until the two are bound by the same rules. In my opinion,that is precisely what should happen. I make 12 points to illustrate this:-

  1. Judges will still find “compelling reasons” not to publish controversial judgements. Their judgements are 99% in favour of local authorities so parents views will NOT be published.
  2. The public(including grandparents and relatives of parents) will still be excluded from family courts.
  3. Mothers whose babies have been taken at birth will still be threatened with jail if they” go public”. Forced adoption will uniquely in the UK continue “big time” as a major government target.
  4. More children will still be taken for emotional abuse (or risk of it !) than those removed for both sex abuse and physical abuse added together.
  5. The media will still be forbidden to name parents who want to protest openly and publicly, waive anonymity like rape victims and use their own names.
  6. Children taken into care will still have their mobiles and laptops confiscated to isolate them from family and friends. Conversation with visiting parents will still be strictly censored.
  7. Children in care receiving visits will still be forbidden to report to parents abuse by fosterers, care workers or social workers, and nearly half will still end up in jail or as sex workers.
  8. Agencies like Barnardos and N.F.A (founded by 2 social workers and sold for £130million+) will still make fortunes from recruiting fosterers and adoptive parents.
  9. Many foreign visitors who are single parents here for a holiday or to meet with relatives will if accused by uk social services of neglect etc be prevented from returning home to face social services in their homelands  and  their children will still be taken for forced adoption in the UK.
  10. Pregnant women fleeing the UK before any court proceedings start will still be tracked down in foreign countries by the SS who will often start proceedings abroad to recover the children  for forced adoption or long term fostering in the UK.
  11. Judges will continue to issue injunctions forbidding parents who have committed no crime from contacting directly or indirectly their own children for periods of many years.
  12. PUNISHMENT WITHOUT CRIME will continue to be inflicted on parents, as experts (described as hired guns in Prof Jane Ireland’s report for the government)predict risk of harm to children who are then adopted.

Nothing much will change…..

THE JUDGES KNOW THE SYSTEM IS ROTTEN BUT THEY DO NOT WANT TO REFORM.”

Furthermore:

The titles of recent articles by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph make it also clear:

And then there is the Nigerian press debating the rights of girls to be a child rather than become bride: 

Remember that the worst of all child snatching cases is the Nigerian family whose seven children were taken: five at home, one after the birth in hospital, one in prison – for the parents were sentenced to seven years imprisonment – in the most farcical of all staged court cases – with a rigged jury!

And here’s the latest video by Nigel Cooper whose daughter was kidnapped from Belgium.
 

OUR ‘child protection’ system is an international scandal: House of Commons, Downing St and Nigeria

19 Comments

A Latvian and Dutch parent whose children were stolen by the UK

It’s either sex or money or both that are the reasons and explanations for what we’ve been observing in the ‘care’ system:

John Hemming MP’s meeting in the House of Commons with representatives from 30 Embassies resulted in More

VOTING with our Mouse: House of Commons Meeting for Early Day Motions and Petitions

6 Comments

THIS VIDEO of our meeting with John Hemming MP on 02/07/2013 in Committee Room 14 was based on this list of questions addressing Secrecy – the Cloak for Criminality?

Besides helping each other, solutions seem to be

  • Private Prosecutions – to get justice in individual cases – such as Michael Doherty
  • Judicial Reviews – to hold public bodies to account – such as the one we have just submitted
  • Protest – as this barrister recommended in a meeting about the erosion of civil rights…

Also our online petitions with their most interesting comments

And Early Day Motions (EDMs) – for our MPs to sign – by finding them with WriteToThem.com:

While we were talking about the Mental Capacity Act and Forced Adoptions, retired BA pilot Len Lawrence produced the video below to expose the Court of Protection and its wrongdoings: making medical and financial decisions such as the sale of his house for his ‘protection’ – under value:

  • he was made HOMELESS
  • his ex-wife got 85% of the sale, he got 15%
  • after £100,000 went to lawyers.

Might a video on YouTube stand more of a chance to get justice and compensation for victims than our paper submissions to Kenneth Clarke and Vince Cable four years ago?

Secrecy cloaks white collar criminals to snatch children, steal assets and deprive people of their liberty, often in bright daylight and under the disguise of ‘justice’.

Regarding the Official Solicitor and Adoptions without Parental Consent a Nottingham Law Firm publishes:

1. Learning Disabilities Case – reporting on the ‘stupid mum case’ on 17 June 2009 in the Nottingham Evening Post:

  • the ‘expert’ claimed she had learning difficulties – which was “complete rubbish and ludicrous”, as John Hemming MP said.

2. Sunday Times Article 14th June 2009: More ‘stupid’ mothers prevented from fighting adoptions

  • I will continue to fight the adoption and am taking my case to the European Court of Justice.” Ms Pullen …
  • New figures show that hundreds of parents have had the official solicitor, currently Alastair Pitblado, imposed.
  • Since January 2006 his department has been brought in to represent 588 parents deemed to “lack the mental capacity” to instruct lawyers in cases where their children faced the possibility of adoption.

 3. BBC on 7 April 2013: Majority of ‘deprivation of liberty’ cases unreported, says report

Figures suggest around 7,000 people were deprived of their liberty without procedures being followed. Limits placed on the freedom of people with dementia or brain injuries are not being properly recorded, according to a healthcare regulator.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) said almost two-thirds of applications to restrict a person’s liberty were not reported to it, as required by law. In some cases, patients had their freedom removed for months at a time. Almost 12,000 applications were made to restrict people’s liberty between April 2011 and March 2012, an increase of 57% in two years. But in England the CQC found only 37% of cases were properly recorded last year.

As a result, around 7,000 people were deprived of their liberty in a way that did not follow procedure.

No wonder, John Hemming MP has been interested in ‘secret prisoners‘ for a long time… And you, will you sign, reblog, tweet, like, share or even more???

E.g. you could join us at a Court Hearing on Wednesday, July 10th or the demo on July 19th outside Downing Street to Return the Stolen Children of the UK! Do we need to wait until children die, go missing or find their parents via Facebook???

OFFICIAL SOLICITOR at Court of Protection uses false documents to steal assets

12 Comments

Len Lawrence is a retired air pilot who made this video to bring to the attention of the President of the Family Courts and the Court of Protection what is occurring ‘under his radar':

  1.  Many people are ‘certified’, i.e. declared not to have ‘mental capacity’, without medical assessments, under the jurisdiction of the Official Solicitor, Alastair Pitbardo and his Deputy, May Maughan;
  2. Certificates of Incapacity bear no serial number. They cannot be tracked.
  3. This is of great concern as Frances Gibb wrote on 4 April 2013 in The Times Life or death: man who helps courts decide, i.e. how the Official Solicitor acts as ‘litigation friend’ for the vulnerable in the Court of Protection.
  4. Len is particularly concerned for the number of parents who are declared not to have capacity so that the Official Solicitor can decide that their children can be adopted away from them:
  • without informing the Court of Protection and making medical and financial decisions as in Len’s case.

A High Court Judge said these documents are not to be disclosed to the Family Division. But Len is a victim of white collar crimes who has become a ‘public interest advocate’ like many others. More

SECRECY – the Cloak for Criminality? Meeting John Hemming MP on Tuesday July 2nd

5 Comments

English: Human Rights logo: "FREE AS A MA...

English: Human Rights logo: “FREE AS A MAN” esp ->svg Français : Logo pour les droits de l’homme : « Free as a man ». Русский: Свободен как человек, победитель в международном конкурсе логотипа, символзириюущего Прав человека, http://humanrightslogo.net/ (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Secrecy of Family Courts links to the Secret Prisoners who have been of interest to John Hemming MP for a long time.

But as our civil rights are being diminished more and more, we need to learn yet more to stand our ground and know that we are not alone.

By connecting with other victims, we become ‘starfighters’ and campaigners, McKenzie Friends, online activists and Public Interest Advocates.

On July 2nd we have the opportunity to meet in the House of Commons again – in Committee Room 14 – from 10 to 12am – and network in the Jubilee Cafe afterwards.

More on http://bit.ly/10hAs2u and http://www.meetup.com/victims-unite/ to formulate questions and register.

SECRECY: the Cloak of Criminality? Who can do what about it?

20 Comments

12 06 17 secret childWhen John Hemming MP joined us at our Westminster meeting in January 2011, to explore a Public Inquiry into White Collar Crimes, I knew that ‘secret prisoners‘ were his ‘pet subject':

  • the use of the Court of ‘Protection‘ to steal the assets of mainly elderly people, by declaring them ‘not to have capacity’ to instruct solicitors
  • as a result, people are secretly imprisoned.

At the time, I did not know as much about secret family courts as I wish I  never needed to learn:

  • secret family courts are used to sanction and ‘legalise’ the child snatching carried out by Social Services – supposedly in the ‘best interest of the child’
  • I launched Stop Forced Adoptions in the UK as an online petition that non-UK MEPs want to take further in Brussels, as soon as 2,000 signatures are reached
  • I re-vamped Ian Josephs’ www.forced-adoption.com into Punishment without Crime, as he has been advising between 3 and 6 parents a day since the sixties.

Now I have seen how extra secrecy was used in a family court case:  More

Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,678 other followers