Child Snatching
Child snatching aka state kidnapping is a glib way of describing what is too terrible to be true, too hard to imagine and thus too unbelievable. However, based on my observation of white collar crimes, it’s the tip of the iceberg.
Here are the facts that I have experienced:
- nine cases that I know sufficiently to submit them to the Parliamentary Education Select Committee that is currently investigation ‘child protection’
- Saturday 3rd March, 2012h when Anonymous UK vs Social Services is staging a demo in Haringey Council
- Tuesday 6th March, 2012 that we’re organising to support the world wide Peaceful Protest against child abuse.
More on Social Services stealing children as well as
![Why Everyone Is a Victim [Except Rich Criminals]](http://edm1297.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/ocls.jpg?w=171&h=264 "Book by Evan Whitton")
Mar 15, 2012 @ 21:57:14
Mar 23, 2012 @ 20:29:07
Mar 25, 2012 @ 16:11:02
It happened in Bristol: Maurice, for once, felt listened to as a Litigant in Person - 02 Legal Battles
Mar 27, 2012 @ 08:08:37
Mar 29, 2012 @ 06:47:40
Mar 31, 2012 @ 09:41:22
Mar 31, 2012 @ 11:58:36
Apr 01, 2012 @ 15:45:00
Apr 01, 2012 @ 19:42:23
Apr 19, 2012 @ 21:18:55
Apr 21, 2012 @ 15:52:59
Apr 22, 2012 @ 21:44:25
Apr 22, 2012 @ 22:36:37
Apr 28, 2012 @ 20:35:56
May 11, 2012 @ 10:58:50
May 21, 2012 @ 08:43:02
May 21, 2012 @ 12:38:06
Sir Nicholas Wall strikes again…
To give a full indication of the calibre of lawyers that are appointed as family law judges, please read the below about the now infamous “Sir” Nicholas Wall (Head of the UK family court):
Sir Nicholas Wall allows his Family Court judges to oversee cases while on holiday, hundreds of miles away;
Sir Nicholas Wall ruled that the compensation a man received after he lost a leg in a traffic accident should be shared equally with his ex-wife as part of a divorce settlement. The £500,000 was awarded to compensate the poor man for a future life of disability;
Sir Nicholas Wall ruled that the ex-husband of a millionaires should only be paid £5,000,000 of her £55,000,000 fortune;
Sir Nicholas Wall argues “time for no fault divorces”;
Sir Nicholas Wall suggested that unmarried couples should have equal rights to property as married couples;
John Hemming MP lodges an official complaint to judicial ombudsman about Sir Nicholas. The reference to a forged document been accepted as evidence;
August 2011 – “Sir” Nicholas Wall argues family Court proceedings must be held in private;
November 2011 – Sir Nicholas Wall argues there should be much more transparency for family court proceedings;
I could give another 20 examples of this same elk…
If “Sir” Nicholas Wall (the 67-year-old lawyer at the helm of the UK family court) is not prosecuted for his involvement in this case, he must then be remembered in history as the produce that superseded TEFLON. Clearly nothing sticks…
May 26, 2012 @ 11:28:18
Jun 02, 2012 @ 11:07:39
Jun 02, 2012 @ 11:27:16
Jun 03, 2012 @ 20:01:19
Jun 28, 2012 @ 08:26:54
Jul 04, 2012 @ 10:18:48
Jul 04, 2012 @ 16:17:32
Jul 09, 2012 @ 18:14:24
Jul 15, 2012 @ 06:24:10
Jul 22, 2012 @ 11:42:14
Aug 14, 2012 @ 22:46:52
Seven Years for Child Cruelty and Lying Actress Michelle Collins - 02 Legal Battles
Aug 16, 2012 @ 21:47:59
Aug 16, 2012 @ 22:18:55
Aug 23, 2012 @ 20:59:27
Aug 26, 2012 @ 14:16:07
Sep 17, 2012 @ 09:27:15
Sep 23, 2012 @ 18:17:17
Sep 24, 2012 @ 22:51:47
Oct 07, 2012 @ 22:04:43
Oct 15, 2012 @ 05:34:13
Oct 25, 2012 @ 17:13:26
Oct 28, 2012 @ 09:23:57
Oct 28, 2012 @ 09:52:45
Oct 28, 2012 @ 15:00:52
Nov 05, 2012 @ 16:46:20
Nov 09, 2012 @ 09:40:06
Nov 10, 2012 @ 23:27:47
Nov 11, 2012 @ 23:32:05
Nov 15, 2012 @ 23:46:43
Nov 20, 2012 @ 12:28:54
Dec 01, 2012 @ 15:49:45
Dec 02, 2012 @ 14:49:48
Dec 02, 2012 @ 20:29:55
Dec 25, 2012 @ 18:57:34
Jan 01, 2013 @ 22:47:33
Jan 04, 2013 @ 17:31:53
My daughter has been adopted today and my partner and i was never given anoth time to contest the adoption but social services and the judge still went ahead with the case im gonna expose social services for what they really are so who wants to join me.
Jan 04, 2013 @ 22:36:22
Dear Kevin
We all need to ‘up our ante’ by joining together as effectively as possible.
There are actually quite a few groups on Facebook but I suspect that most victims are still feeling terribly isolated.
Hence I’ve now set up http://www.meetup.com/victims-unite/ to facilitate private meetings between group members and public meetings in the House of Commons that I’ve organised every so often.
To challenge ‘wrongful adoptions’ in UK courts must be on top of our agenda!!!
But we all need to become much more astute in balancing injustice with the right kind of online publicity, methinks.
A New Year for new learning!
May it result in turning your pain into success eventually!!!
Jan 09, 2013 @ 11:00:34
Jan 13, 2013 @ 13:01:54
Jan 14, 2013 @ 19:34:32
Feb 13, 2013 @ 19:02:55
Mar 03, 2013 @ 09:01:56
Mar 03, 2013 @ 14:09:47
Mar 09, 2013 @ 18:37:24
Mar 11, 2013 @ 18:39:00
Mar 14, 2013 @ 16:05:11
Mar 21, 2013 @ 22:01:27
Mar 29, 2013 @ 10:53:46
Mar 30, 2013 @ 19:49:01
Apr 03, 2013 @ 20:56:59
Apr 05, 2013 @ 09:59:10
Apr 13, 2013 @ 14:24:37
You need to read this case, at last the courts are bringing a stop to this. This case describes how Haringey just make it all up.
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2013/416.html
However, this time they picked on two social workers who took them apart.
Apr 14, 2013 @ 09:44:46
It’s particularly interesting, as the Musa case was also started with a faked accusatory letter.
Apr 14, 2013 @ 20:18:28
This is what happened to me with the same Sylvia Chew. I complained through the ombudsmen at the time and she wrote to the Ombudsman saying that initial and core assessments were not required. I instructed in judicial review, just as that case, and was charged £2000 for reading the papers and was quoted £18,000 to proceed. Since then I have done it myself.
In the case of the Musa’s I have worked out how the criminal evidence was doctored. The Crown Prosecution Service have invented an offence called “excessive chastisement of a child”. There is no such offence. There are various assault charges for which a defence of reasonable chastisement can brought, i.e smacking.
It is an offence under section 1(1) Children and Young Peoples Act 1933 and the offender is added to the schedule 1 offenders register, under the same act, as convicted of an offence against a child. This gives the police and security services access to all of confidential records, including health, under the pretext of child protection. They can then amend those records.
Alastair
Apr 18, 2013 @ 20:59:07
Apr 18, 2013 @ 21:45:45
From very personal experience I can say wholeheartedly that very little if no good comes from social services or cafcass. That said it’s also very much down to useless courts and in my personal opinion corrupt an DEFFO very biased. In a court case isn’t it court duty to gather the evidence an look at it ALL then deliberate over it THEN MAKE A RULING and not just take one side over another….?… Is that any kind of justice or fairness…NOT AT ALL I SAY….AND NO USELESS GOVERNMENT WILL SILENCE ME WHILE I DRAW BREATH N HAVE INTERNET ACCESS…..CHEW THAT GOVERNMENT..
Apr 18, 2013 @ 21:48:08
The family courts are there to SANCTION and LEGITIMISE what Social Services and their allies are doing. It couldn’t be more corrupt, heinous, unlawful and unethical.
We got #paedobritain trending on 28th March. 19th July is the next target date. Meanwhile we just gotta keep kicking!
Praised be the internet!
Apr 20, 2013 @ 09:22:26
Apr 20, 2013 @ 20:14:08
Apr 21, 2013 @ 10:20:08
May 19, 2013 @ 18:24:14