Gedaljahu Ebert (no. 4)
This fraudulent bankruptcy has been documented extensively in The Forensics of Legal Fraud by Brad Meyer and Gedaljahu Ebert.
How his bankruptcy has forced him to take the law into his own hands by means of a citizens arrest, is the subject of this 34-minute presentation of videos referring to this document of invitation and evidence.
His case is listed as no. 4 under Grouping Cases to Enforce the Bank of England Act 1694 and introduces himself on video to our meeting at the House of Lords in March 2010.
The Citizens Arrest that he attempted on 22 February 2011 was recorded on video here.
Here’s the news release that I produced for the occasion.
And here’s the website focussing on his dilemma.
![Why Everyone Is a Victim [Except Rich Criminals]](http://edm1297.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/ocls.jpg?w=171&h=264 "Book by Evan Whitton")
Feb 23, 2011 @ 10:02:12
Please send my best wishes to Mr Ebert in his fight for justice. I find it heartbreaking when people in Public Service use their positions to further their own wealth and power. I think everyone needs to be aware of the sedimentation of power and how it can act in an unlawful way.
Feb 14, 2012 @ 17:43:10
You are invited to look at the fact in Volume 1 of The Forensics of Legal Fraud. It teaches you a LOT about what banks, court staff and solicitors get up to!
Feb 15, 2012 @ 11:07:55
Who is this Anonymous idiot ? ???.
I personaly obtained a reply from the Land Registry that clearly states
Baruch enterprises- Baruch family never ! owned Eberts house.
I have copies of letters by Rudi Viz MP to Irvine of Lairge ( another scottish
traitor) clearly stating ” there are serious allegations of fraud by Lord Justice
Nueberger ” To. David Blunkett Home secretary ” these issues are fundamental to our democracy etc ” these are facts out of many facts !
And My case is genuine and I have the proof ! of state kidnapping by
Butler-Sloss, Malicious Bankruptcy to destroy citizens that expose the
legal mafia. google: Gorsey Hey Masonic Home re: Hansard debate
House of Commons: These are facts anonymous, not your usual drivel.
Are You a Mafia member Anonymous ?? trying to discredit Victims Unite with
your obvious dishonest clap-trap.
And as for jews stealing from Jews the biggest thief exposed on Public Record
Court Documents is Master of The Rolls & Rabbi Nueberger. Now arsehole
Anonymous that should be libel if it is not true ! Why dont you send it to
Rabbi Nueberger. so he can sue me !
Feb 15, 2012 @ 12:17:07
Thanks, Peter, you know better than I do.
Mr Anonymous is too keen to spread his lies too far and too often.
Hence I deleted his comments after discussion with others thinking of Stephen Fry and his rules of engagement.
Feb 15, 2012 @ 16:58:10
Sabine.
Lies ??
Everything I have said is true. You hae deleted the facts and I guess that makes a joke of your whole campaign. Perhaps you are another one who lives in fantasy land and who fails to face the reality.
Feb 15, 2012 @ 17:34:09
I have asked you whether you’d like to provide the evidence in private or in public. To claim ‘truth’ without evidence isn’t enough.
A comment on my site isn’t enough ‘reality’ either, I’m afraid, to justify defamation – whether of myself or any of the victims I give space to.
Feb 16, 2012 @ 17:56:55
Sabine
I am happy ready and willing to show you incriminating evidence against Mr. Ebert otherwise known here as Peter Oakes.
I have the following conditions
1. My name and details remain confidential and not shown at any point to Ebert.
2. Once I show you the evidence both written and direct you in the right directions and you conclude what will be obvious in that Ebert has conned you , that you will make it known on this site and not allow Ebert any access to this site .
If I am going to waste time on this I need to know that you are not one sided and will be happy to see and digest evidence against Ebert.
The evidence will include
1. His suspicion for fraud in Israel
2. Details of his debts and creditors in Germany including selling merchandise he bought wholesale cheaper then wholesale price because he had no intention of ever paying wholesaler.
3. Details of him defrauding his partner in Liverpool and fabricating expenses.
4. Details of fabricated repair invoices produced to landlords in so called expenses and repairs.
5. statements from builders against invoices who confirm that they either never carried out the work or inflated the invoices as requested by Mr. Ebert in order to give Ebert a kick back. This was to hide from his partner the true cost of expenses.
6. Copy of Liverpool city council letter confirming that Ebert defrauded in rents.
7. Contacts in the business community and in Jewish community who will back up with stories about Ebert and different type of fraud he has committed. He owes considerable amount of people considerable money.
There are many more issues to list but I would be going on forever as the eloits of this man go far and beyond.I believe my offer is reasonable and I look forward to hear from you.
Mar 06, 2013 @ 11:48:56
MR / MS OR MISS ANONYMOUS? IT’S CLEAR YOU DID NOT GO TO SPEC- SAVERS! I KNOW BOTH MR PETER OAKS, AND MR.GEDAJAHU EBERT, PERSONALLY AND HAVE REVIEWED AND INVESTIGATED THEIR CLAIMS, ALL OF WHICH ARE LEGITIMATE – AND REGRETTABLY CONSISTENT WITH THE TREATMENT STILL BEING HANDED OUT RIGHT ACROSS THIS COUNTRY IN THE 21ST CENTURY – READ THE ACCOUNTS IN THE BOOKS OF CHARLES DICKENS – AND OR THE 3 TRIALS OF WILLIAM HONE, FROM WHICH YOU WILL SEE THAT THE BRITISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS STILL “ROTTEN TO THE CORE” AND WITNESS WHAT HONE DESCRIBED AS:
“THE WANTONNESS OF IMPUNITY” PLEASE BRING YOU EVIDENCE TO AN APPOINTED PLACE OF YOUR CHOOSING – THE PROOF OF WHAT YOU CLAIM – THE HOUSE OF COMMONS WOULD SUIT US ALL FINE.
FOR WE HERE ARE AWARE THAT: “ANONYMITY IS THE FIRST REFUGE FOR LIARS SCOUNDRELS AND DISSEMBLERS.
DAVID M. PIDCOCK
LEADER OF THE ISLAMIC PARTY OF BRITAIN
Mar 06, 2013 @ 11:56:24
CORRECTION – SORRY MR/MS/MISS ANONYMOUS – MR PETER OAKES
AND PLEASE BRING YOUR EVIDENCE – NOT YOU EVIDENCE –
THANK YOU SPEC -SAVERS
Mar 06, 2013 @ 11:59:32
DEAR ANONYMOUS – IT WOULDN’T BE BARUCH BY ANY CHANCE?