Misconduct of Solicitors

There are a number of complaints that have not gone anywhere, because the Law Society covers its members up.

Here’s a list of complaints to show that you are NOT alone.

You could also try the new Legal Ombudsman.

9 Comments (+add yours?)

John
Jan 29, 2012 @ 14:31:06

I have experienced problems with the Official Solicitor. 10 years ago they were asked to take on a case against my parents for child abuse which has crippled me mentally. Having never looked at anything in relation to the claim against my parents they declined “because of lack of evidence.” When I took the papers and the evidence to their offices to ask them to look at the evidence they refused. Several years later a psychiatrist asked them to take on the running of the case. This time they did not even reply. A legal adviser informed me that they did not want to take on the case because of costs. Then the perpetrators of the child abuse (my parents) died and the official solicitor at this point decided to take on the runnning of this case. Apparently because they could be paid significant costs. My parents’ estate was £1.400.000. It was devided between my brother and myself. I have been awarded after probate £200.000. Where has the money gone?

Reply
- Sabine Kurjo McNeill
  Jan 29, 2012 @ 21:22:57
  
  Dear John
  
  I’ve asked John Hemming MP who asks whether your solicitor lives on Fair Isle. If that’s him, he would offer to talk to his / your MP.
  
  Can you confirm or email me on sabine AT 3d-metrics.com?
  
  Reply
Anonymous
May 31, 2012 @ 13:41:48

solicitors from hell back on line, thank god.

family barrister Carol Mashembro in bristol, did her dirty tricks in the south west, with corrupt firms/corrupt judges via family court.

Reply
Anonymous
May 31, 2012 @ 13:43:26

SRA IS PROTECTING CORRUPT SOLICITORS. brick wall against the truth coming out

Reply
Anonymous
Jun 05, 2012 @ 19:13:23

Judges swear an Oath to the Queen.
Is the Queen under the control of others?

So many can prove corruption in the courts.
we now have the european arrest warrent. illegal.

uk government appears to be trying to bring in by the back door, House of Lords, a police force, like the F.B. I .This appears to be illegal.

M.P’s should make a stand against the above.
what about the bill of rights 1668.

Reply
Kenneth Noel Gabriel Curran
Nov 28, 2012 @ 14:10:40

Dia dhuit! Little doubt ongoing cover-up re District Courts-Martial 11/02/1985. The Royal British Legion recognise “anomalies” – need to pursue redress of grievances, “a stitch up”. And then issues/matters surrounding abuse of my children and cover up York council and others. I will battle on as necessary within confines of the LAW in spirit of the LAW as intended. Had others listened to me, had others listened to my son DECLAN G.M. CURRAN… “…… son found hanged” 6TH JUNE 1995..
Abusers… mill-stones round necks, cast into sea(of quick-lime) a.s.p.:a.t.e.

Reply
mauricekirky
Nov 28, 2012 @ 14:47:57

I employed solicitors twenty years ago against the South Wales Police and soon sacked following their unprofessiional conduct. My next commited suicide leaving ten years of search for independant legal advice.

I recently employed a solicitor who has now disappeared off the map!

The barrister cannot find him and for a week none of my calls get through or e-mails acknowledged .

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com blogs and downloads indicate the seriousness and magnitude which I will also comment upon on Dialect Radio, Bristol 2pm Fridays 93.2 FM

Maurice

Reply
Norma
Mar 10, 2013 @ 02:05:12

The law society….
Lets take a look at what they are….
A monopolist is defined as a single supplier that constitutes the whole industry. The legal definition of monopoly is a firm which has a market share greater than 25%. Monopolists tend to have the … the right or have been given ” legal monopoly by goverment to be the only one company to carry out the supply…of a particular product or service.

Is the law society a “Limited company”? well they are registered as a limited company.
The Goverment rebuffs victims time and time again, yet it is Goverment that is at the head of the realm of the law society which is and does operate as a “monopoly”. that being the case the Goverment has the power to take away
that legal power if a company abuses its position and power.

Mr Vince Cable must in his role as the Bisuness & Industry Secretrary investigate if the law society has and does use its powers for the advancement and benefit in its “own interests” the monoply rules do not allow for this, nor does it allow a company to “overeach its powers” when those powers are and, in particular used to put at or disadvantage the Public in favour of its own company interests, employees and or members.

Here we have the law society registered as a Limited Company, yet it has the monoply over the legal industry, a Limited Company that spans internationaly, can Mr Cable explain how on earth a company that is so large, powerful, and being “internationaly exspansive” can possibly be perceived as a “limited Company” ?

Is it not time to break up this monoply, to bring about healthy competion, fairness, and choice for both the public and the legal industry, giving rise to a more affordable service?.

If a Limited Company is allowed such unchallanged power, then victims of legal services will continue to be let down and more importantly “unprotected”
When a company fails to appropriatly use its own regulation to protect consumers of “legal services” then on that one basis alone merits an investigation by the Bisuness & Industry secretrary.

When this all powerful company can rule that a member of the public who has paid for a service, in that, the consumer has had a “adeqiaute Service” in order to protect its member, when that member did not even provide a “contract of Service” to that consumer required by “Law”, which according to the SRA/Fraud unit failure to provide a contract of service is in fact a “Crime” when that member then goes on to perpetrate numerous acts of fraud, and pervert the course of justice, how can that possibly be an adeqaute service Mr Cable? and please note the law society is, in this statement confirming the word “service”

So were does that leave the consumer of this paid for legal service, and were does that leave the law society member? is this not only an over reaching of this “limited Company’s” power but also an abuse of its powers?

Are we the public to continue t be forced to live with the damage and injustice that this “Limited Company” has power the to address in the interest of public protection, but instead uses its powers to dissempower the public, by re-appropriating consumer protection to protect its members.

Lets bring this company in line with the consumer protection act, and in order to do that the “monopoly” that is law society MUST in “the public interest” be broken up.
We the public demand consumer protection, we the public need consumer protection, and radical reform of the legal industry.

Norma

Reply
- Sabine Kurjo McNeill
  Mar 10, 2013 @ 15:17:06
  
  Could you ask your local MP to write to Vince Cable, Norma?
  
  That seems to be the best use one can make of one’s MP.
  
  MPs’ letters get ‘fast tracked’ by Ministers, whereas the public gets ignored…
  
  Your analysis matches ‘When corporations rule the world’!…
  
  BIG SIGHS.
  
  Reply