TURNING the TABLES: Accused man threatens prosecutors with arrest at court

20141204_141448How long are victims expected to remain victims?

How long do judges expect to get away with hiding behind ‘contempt of court‘ while seriously harassing victims of a system of white collar criminals?

How long will judges continue to legitimise crimes instead of going into early retirement and compensating victims?

These two wigged heads hang in the Library of the EU Parliamentary building. Do they indicate the past of modern judges abusing historical and traditional privileges? Or have judges always been more bad than good in this adversarial system? Why did Dickens have to write Bleak House???

Here the Hereford Times briefly reports about Guy Taylor:

Posted in Legal Remedies, Private Prosecution | Tagged | 6 Comments

CRIMINAL @NYorksPolice in action: #Lies, #Violence, #Greed and #RuleOfMoney

Truth doesn’t permit lies. But North Yorkshire Police even travels to Austria to commit crimes and produce lies: dropping pornographic images on the computer of innocent people is one preferred message as a way to get victims who stand up for themselves behind bars.

The Press reports: Indecent images case!

Here’s the excellent background: Judges and Police in Yorkshire set up Peter Hofschrör because he refused to keep quiet about Savile, child sex and corrupt Police and Judges


Posted in Elderly abuse, North Yorkshire Police | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

25th ANNIVERSARY of UN Convention on #ChildRights triggers #EU_Resolution

Originally posted on No Punishment without Crime or Bereavement without Death!:

14 11 24 EPRS Child RightsHere’s is the Parliamentary Question raised by German Axel VOSS MEP on 16 October 2014 and here is the text for the Draft Motion of a Resolution – with my highlights – in the Plenary Sitting that has been postponed due to a no confidence vote in EU Commissioner Juncker.

In my view, the following is relevant to the UK in the Resolution regarding the 25th anniversary of the UN Convention on Child Rights:

View original 303 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

RESPONSE comes to the rescue once again – to prevent #unlawful #eviction

Originally posted on Mr Gedaljahu Ebert - Bankrupted Fraudulently without Jurisdiction:

This is a remarkable RESPONSE network of ‘ad hoc rescuers’ or ‘Hometown Heroes‘:

RESPONSE came to help Mr Ebert who had been unlawfully evicted once before, exemplifying the white collar crimes that ‘professionals’ are capable of. But who cares?

Here’s the video of the successful protection of innocent victims of the institutionalised collusion between white collar criminals:

Here’s the press release that RESPONSE issued:

And here are two photos of the event: 14 11 20 Mr Ebert14 11 20 Mr Ebert eviction 114 11 20 Mr Ebert eviction 2

View original

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

#MONEY: deadly weapon as #MoneyCreation is discussed by MPs

Today is the day that the Backbench Committee has put Money Creation and Society on its agenda – thanks to Positive Money – the ‘next generation’ campaigning group of what we discussed in the House of Lords and Commons since 1998 as the Forum for Stable Currencies.

The video below shows how paid professionals and politicians abuse their power to decide over the financial fate of disabled people (and others): http://www.cloudzilla.to/embed/64Z3EI1VUEEUVW5M4KILJYHFU/

Please note the Early Day Motions that Austin Mitchell MP has tabled since 2002 about this topic!

Posted in Early Day Motion, Money Creaton, Parliament, Rule of Money, White-Collar Crimes, White-Collar Criminals | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

#HumanRights Issues become #HumanDuties: in the name of Defenceless Children and Intimidated Parents

Searching BBC News for ‘child abuse’ results in these articles. My selection are these to paint a ‘critical picture’, as I’m preparing follow-ups from my last trip to Brussels. There, a Polish mum addressed the Committee on behalf of ‘defenceless children’ and ‘intimidated parents’. Intimidation takes place via threat with prison. And already in 2006, Harriet Harman MP admitted that 200 parents a year are being imprisoned through the secrecy of family courts.

Last night I spoke with a ‘process server’ who had a ‘package’ for me. She claimed that by opening the envelope from a firm of solicitors in Milton Keynes and by reading a ‘Reporting Restriction Order’ about a case I never heard of, I was ‘served’ with this ‘package’ that I refused to accept… Gagging is one of the characteristics that make the UK unique among European countries. That’s why parents were punished for going to Brussels and that’s why other Parents fight British social services ‘gag’ to petition European Parliament.

Can you join the dots between

10 Nov 2014: Timeline: 1980s child abuse allegations – The key events that led to the launch of two reviews into the way allegations of child abuse were handled in Westminster and wider society.

10 Nov 2014: Why the historical child abuse inquiries are in the news – There have been claims for many years about paedophiles in powerful places and establishment attempts to cover-up their actions.

18 Nov 2014: Organised child sex abuse ‘widespread in England’, MPs say – MPs said Rotherham Council’s child protection policies were “divorced from reality” – Organised child sex abuse is widespread in England, a report by MPs on the Rotherham exploitation scandal says.

19 Nov 2014: Councils leaving children at sex-abuse risk, says Ofsted – The Ofsted report comes against a backdrop of allegations over organised child abuse and exploitation – Vulnerable children in England are at risk of sexual exploitation and abuse because of council failures, the children’s services watchdog has said.

Related articles

Posted in Abuse Survivors, BBC, Child 'care', Child 'Protection', Child Abuse, Paedophilia | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

TO GAG or not to gag: The Hon. Mr Justice Peter Jackson teaches Medway Council a lesson

Well, that’s a wise judgement in response to a knee jerk reaction by Medway Council. Why on earth do they think they can keep trying to exert their power and abuse it? Who do they think they are?

There’s a father who melts by just looking at his son and a council that tries its best to sever that link and interrupt the boy’s development in school, synagogue, at home and abroad! They want his passport next, would you believe it!? “In the best interest of the child!?” It depends who decides, said Renate Weber MEP from Romania when we were with the Petitions Committee on 11/11/14!

Here’s the article in The Telegraph: Parents fight British social services ‘gag’ to petition European Parliament – Britain’s social services “unique” in EU for “threatening and bullying” of parents who speak out against forced adoption of their children, say MEPs.

And here’s the chronology of the victimisation and interference by the Council.

Before Mr Justice Peter Jackson on 14.11.14

No order on the application by Medway County Council for a Reporting Restriction Order.

Jackson J noted as follows (to be recorded on the court file):

  1. I can see nomatterforthisto be a without notice application to the other parties in the care proceedings.2. The Local Authority appears to have made no effective effort to follow the Practice Direction by giving reasonable notice to the media.3.  I don’t wish to prejudice whatappearsto be a supposition that for anypublicityto be attached to a child is itself harmful.4.  I saw this morning the papers sent to my clerk after 6pm yesterday. I wonder if this application is a wise initiative on behalf of the Local Authority.5. If an application for a Reporting Restriction Order is made – it should be properly made, on proper notice and so that all matters can be tested.

    6. I say nothing about the current proceedings at Tunbridge Wells. This is entirely a matter for the Judge there as to whether there are welfare concerns for the child but I express that it’s further a matter for that Judge to enforce rules as to confidentiality of documents.

    7. It is the court process not the facts that is privileged. Furthermore, it is for the media to express a concern at being served an order that prevents somebody from speaking to them and being expected to comply with this as if it were a Reporting Restriction Order.

Posted in European Parliament, Local Authorities, Medway Council, Petitions Committee | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment