TOWARDS a 2014 of BREAK-THROUGHS – and break-OUTS from the Asylum that the Lunatics are running

42 Comments

14 01 05 LunaticsNow do you believe us? was an article that caused me to write a blog post not long ago – on the site of a Portuguese family whose five children were taken by Lincoln Council. Remember what’s unique in the UK and whose children are being taken.

The lunatics are taking over the asylum in ‘caring’ Britain in Christopher Booker’s regular column is also ‘beyond belief’. And that is the problem with white collar crimes in general and #childsnatchuk in particular, without even considering #paedobritain: you can only believe the un-believable if you know the people concerned. By way of example:

  • Maurice J Kirk BVSc is currently being held in HMP Cardiff after 4 yours of battling against the then Director of Caswell Clinic in South Wales who claimed that he has ‘significant brain damage, possibly brain tumour’ – as a reason for sending him from his clinic where Maurice spent seven months – to high security prison Ashworth – to cover up crimes committed by South Wales Police;
  • Norman Scarth, WWI veteran tells about his experience of psychiatry in this post on Maurice’s website;
  • Len Lawrence is a former pilot who was poisoned by fumes and declared not to ‘have capacity’; he sent the link to The principle of open justice must be applied to all, even the highly sensitive work of the Court of Protection;
  • I know the woman who was released from HMP Holloway with a ‘community treatment order’: she had to get an injection every month. She had been ‘business woman of the year’ in her county before!

Let me explain in ‘link language’:  More

DON’T ADOPT My Son! – A Leaflet for the Next Empowerment Monday

17 Comments

Stop Forced Adoptions

Empowerment Mondays at the Royal Courts of Justice in London are powerful opportunities for victims to unite and dare to ‘come out’ and ‘speak out’.

DON’T ADOPT MY SON[1]

Homeless in the US whilst he is kept for adoption[2]
as published by John Hemming– the only MP
who stands up for Justice for Families[3]

Melissa’s story is typical for what is unique in the UK[4]: child snatching aka state kidnapping, especially foreigners, sanctioned by courts, parents gagged from speaking out under threat of imprisonment, mainstream media not reporting the truth and children screaming to be heard[5]. Parents are punished without having committed any crime[6]. Forced adoptions[7] take place without their consent.

Deported, imprisoned and beaten for being a parent[8] and Social workers damn us both ways[9] are Christopher Booker’s articles about Melissa Laird[10] in The Telegraph. As McKenzie Friends[11] (lay legal advisors) we visited her in HMP Holloway for nearly two years. We reported: Five mothers on hunger strike[12] which resulted in a gagging order[13] and two journalists being banned from Holloway. We published She wins in Court, but gets beaten up in Prison[14]. One month later, the police interviewed her but no-one got charged.

WHAT CAN WE DO? More

RETURN Our Stolen Children! – What Can We Do? – Our Battle against Judges who ignore the Law

17 Comments

David Jenkins, the organiser of Stolen Children of the UK [S.C.O.T. UK] the 8-day demo outside Downing Street in July 2013 is now in HMP Swansea.

He has had 4 children taken and handed in signatures with a petition that was published in Hansard on 03 September 2013: Children Placed in Foster Care.

Dear Mr Cameron, take the Lead and Return our Stolen Children was the cover letter of our file.

David is now in prison for having named one of the Social Workers involved, even though Lord Justice Munby has made this breakthrough judgement in which he appeals to courts to adapt to the realities of the internet, particularly social media! That includes naming Social Workers!

BUT: as Christopher Booker writes in The Telegraph: Why do our judges in family courts ignore the law? – How can any sane judge decide that a child should remain in ‘care’ of a blind 80-year old widow? Is it coincidence that it’s the same judge who decided that it is up to the ‘discretion of Barnet Council’ whether there should be any contact between a 4-year-old boy and his mother? He has not seen her since December 2011 and she has been deported so that he can be adopted

It is our and Lord Justice Munby’s battle against judges who don’t obey the Law of the Land. No wonder, Belinda McKenzie writes regular Battle News for Britain’s children.

Meanwhile we handed out this leaflet at today’s Empowerment Monday:

RETURN our STOLEN CHILDREN[1]

Parents and Supporters at Empowerment Mondays[2]
and via a Petition in the House of Commons[3]

Social Services take children off their parents for all sorts of frivolous reasons, such as ‘risk of emotional harm’. They hide behind the secrecy of Family Courts[4] who sanction the wrong doing. More

EMPOWERMENT MONDAY with KELLIE COTTAM to Expose Forced Adoptions – despite the Storm

15 Comments

Tomorrow, Monday at the Royal Courts of Justice: Kellie Cottam who dares Flintshare Council to put her in jail, while demanding her children back for Christmas.

Court 43; Before MR JUSTICE MOOR; Monday, 28 October, 2013; At 10:30 AM
Applications/Summonses in Court as in Chambers
FD07D02865  Reading Day. The court is supposed to be ‘vacated’ but she’ll be there to clarify and move on!

I have accompanied more parents than I wish I had to – in and out of prison, starting with Vicky Haigh, the first parent and council named in Parliament by John Hemming MP. She is still far from seeing her daughter and has been ‘inside’ twice, while the worst of all child snatching cases still needs at lot of attention, too: the Nigerian Musas whose seven children were taken, while a farcically staged trial with a hand picked jury sent them to prison for seven years.

Hence I ‘wear three gagging orders with pride’ as my websites were used in courts – but the only ‘secret’ is supposed to be the name and photo of children – who are advertised for adoptions like pets, as Christopher Booker writes in The Telegraph. It’s this utter hypocrisy that gets to me. Supposedly in the “best interest of the child” – but children are NEVER listened to! Instead they are being irreparably damaged and abused. Statistics prove it, but reason or common sense do NOT prevail. It’s all about Welcome to filthy Britain!

I started with state kidnapping as no 12 of the cases we should group to change the law, as advised by Lord Sudeley – the worst historic bankruptcy that the country should be utterly ashamed of.

Since then I built websites and petitions with a Dossier of Online Evidence of currently 10 pages. The latest for Melissa Laird who was deported so that her son could be adopted by Barnet Council and Phil Thompson – the great-grandfather who dares Walsall Council for its crimes. More

I WANT TO SING, I Want to Scream, I Want to Shout: Parents and Grandparents Unite!

14 Comments

This video tells the story of one of the many mothers, parents and grandparents with pictures that tell 1,000 words and lyrics that ought to be taken to heart!

AND: there’s hope:

  1. Please write and talk to your MP about our petition before the House of Commons Children Placed in Foster Care and whether s/he supports you; this is a first step towards ‘ethical elections’ for an ‘ethical Parliament’!
  2. Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, made this remarkable judgement re Baby J on 27 June 2013, thanks to the Father who dared to video how the baby was taken and used Facebook to blame Staffordshire Council,
  3. This judgement made news recently:

Paragraph 32 says: 

It is vital that public confidence in the family justice system is maintained or, if eroded, restored. There is a clear and obvious public interest in maintaining the confidence of the public at large in the courts. It is vitally important, if the administration of justice is to be promoted and public confidence in the courts maintained, that justice be administered in public – or at least in a manner which enables its workings to be properly scrutinised – so that the judges and other participants in the process remain visible and amenable to comment and criticism. This principle, as the Strasbourg court has repeatedly reiterated, is protected by both Article 6 and Article 10 of the Convention. It is a principle of particular importance in the context of care and other public law cases.

Use this judgement! Refer to it – together with the letter of the Minister who keeps repeating: the Law is clear. We just must make sure that the law is ADHERED to and COMPLIED with!!!


SECRECY @ Home = International Concerns and Scandal: especially in Nigeria & Belgium

12 Comments

At the demo outside Downing StreetChristopher Booker keeps covering in The Telegraph what’s happening in Family Courts to ruin families’ lives.

Over 1,500 people signed that their secrecy should be lifted now.

In that spirit, he writes:

But The Times and the Daily Mail thought that this secrecy is being lifted by judges publishing some judgements – after secret hearings. A day later, Martin Narey claims that Family courts don’t take enough children into care, while parents and grandparents are protesting and petitioning all over the country! Look at this Dossier of Evidence!

Hence we are neither amused nor do we agree with the mainstream press. And we are far from alone. Ian Josephs, veteran watchdog of child snatching since the 1960s, writes:

“The justice dealt out  by family courts will still be vastly inferior to that of the criminal courts, until the two are bound by the same rules. In my opinion,that is precisely what should happen. I make 12 points to illustrate this:-

  1. Judges will still find “compelling reasons” not to publish controversial judgements. Their judgements are 99% in favour of local authorities so parents views will NOT be published.
  2. The public(including grandparents and relatives of parents) will still be excluded from family courts.
  3. Mothers whose babies have been taken at birth will still be threatened with jail if they” go public”. Forced adoption will uniquely in the UK continue “big time” as a major government target.
  4. More children will still be taken for emotional abuse (or risk of it !) than those removed for both sex abuse and physical abuse added together.
  5. The media will still be forbidden to name parents who want to protest openly and publicly, waive anonymity like rape victims and use their own names.
  6. Children taken into care will still have their mobiles and laptops confiscated to isolate them from family and friends. Conversation with visiting parents will still be strictly censored.
  7. Children in care receiving visits will still be forbidden to report to parents abuse by fosterers, care workers or social workers, and nearly half will still end up in jail or as sex workers.
  8. Agencies like Barnardos and N.F.A (founded by 2 social workers and sold for £130million+) will still make fortunes from recruiting fosterers and adoptive parents.
  9. Many foreign visitors who are single parents here for a holiday or to meet with relatives will if accused by uk social services of neglect etc be prevented from returning home to face social services in their homelands  and  their children will still be taken for forced adoption in the UK.
  10. Pregnant women fleeing the UK before any court proceedings start will still be tracked down in foreign countries by the SS who will often start proceedings abroad to recover the children  for forced adoption or long term fostering in the UK.
  11. Judges will continue to issue injunctions forbidding parents who have committed no crime from contacting directly or indirectly their own children for periods of many years.
  12. PUNISHMENT WITHOUT CRIME will continue to be inflicted on parents, as experts (described as hired guns in Prof Jane Ireland’s report for the government)predict risk of harm to children who are then adopted.

Nothing much will change…..

THE JUDGES KNOW THE SYSTEM IS ROTTEN BUT THEY DO NOT WANT TO REFORM.”

Furthermore:

The titles of recent articles by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph make it also clear:

And then there is the Nigerian press debating the rights of girls to be a child rather than become bride: 

Remember that the worst of all child snatching cases is the Nigerian family whose seven children were taken: five at home, one after the birth in hospital, one in prison – for the parents were sentenced to seven years imprisonment – in the most farcical of all staged court cases – with a rigged jury!

And here’s the latest video by Nigel Cooper whose daughter was kidnapped from Belgium.
 

OUR ‘child protection’ system is an international scandal: House of Commons, Downing St and Nigeria

15 Comments

A Latvian and Dutch parent whose children were stolen by the UK

It’s either sex or money or both that are the reasons and explanations for what we’ve been observing in the ‘care’ system:

John Hemming MP’s meeting in the House of Commons with representatives from 30 Embassies resulted in More

ON AWARENESS and Action re the worst scandal in Britain: #childsnatchuk leads to #paedobritain

8 Comments

13 05 29 E-Petition child groomingJust in case you have not put your name to this petition on the Governmental site, I wonder whether the screenshot might encourage you?

It shows 2,000 signatures to support a Public Enquiry into organised Child Grooming, Child Prostitution and Paedophilia in the UK.

2,000 was the goal we were given for the EU Petition to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent. So I counted this petition in, when I looked at all the relevant petitions out there to assess how many people know about child ‘care’, secret family courts and forced adoptions.

I know the problem of gathering signatures, as I’ve published 12 online petitions since May 2008. I especially loved compiling the comments and letting them tell their stories. However, it is amazing how much ‘awareness’ it takes before people put their name to a petition. More

STOP Forced Adoptions – stepping stones for criminal Social Services & #paedobritain

18 Comments

Stop Forced AdoptionsHow many children need to be taken from their parents, before the world says NO? 10,000 a year is not enough yet?

How many parents need to be gagged and threatened with prison, before other countries say NO to the UK? Here’s what’s unique in the UK to facilitate forced adoptions. If you have lost your child(ren), please consider filling in this form to let the online world know – anonymously of course.

How many more children need to go missing (currently an estimated 10,000 a year), before their parents make institutions accountable?

How many farces / charades and masquerades need to be staged as ‘court cases’, before Parliament takes responsibility for an ‘independent’ judiciary? ‘Not Open to the Media’ even – despite Camilla Cavendish’s campaign in The Times in 2008?

Parents are now expected to PAY to see their kids in ‘contact centres’. How Stalinesque does the UK want to be?

These are some of the questions that fuelled my ‘wrath of god’ to start the petition Stop Forced Adoptions in the UKMore

A VICTORY for Common Sense and the Rule of Law: child snatching and other news

12 Comments

Family Court

Family Court (Photo credit: lewisha1990)

The latest article in The Telegraph about the family courts is not by but about Christopher Booker! It illustrates how commitment and perseverance to one’s issue may actually get you somewhere, some time… Open up family court hearings, says senior judge – A senior judge has made an important ruling in favour of transparency in the family courts: to allow Christopher Booker to be as rude as he likes to be, because of freedom of speech, and to provide access to court papers, i.e. to remove a gag or injunction. Mr Booker said and wrote “the decision to lift the injunction was a victory for common sense and the rule of law.”

Mr Justice Mostyn is the current President of the Family Courts and he has set a crucial precedence with a ruling about the right to breastfeeding that refers to a milestone case before the European Court in Strasbourg: taking a baby at birth is a “Draconian and extremely harsh measure”.

But the battle to lift the veils of secrecy that shroud the “secret courts” we already have is very far from over, and behind those veils far too many cruel abuses of justice will continue to flourish unreported.

Lord Justice Munby has now called for “greater transparency, and radical and comprehensive reform of the family court system.” More

Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,278 other followers