FOR 22 MAY ELECTIONS – petitions and hashtags: #childsnatchuk for #paedobritain

9 Comments

White collar crime reservation

White collar crime reservation (Photo credit: chrisdaniel)

Institutions tend to respond “we don’t deal with individual cases“, when you dare to complain about having been victimised by white collar criminals.

But local councillors and MEPs will be re-elected on 22 May. They are voted in to care for our causes and solve the problems that ‘the system’ has created for us!

Use www.WriteToThem.com and ask your representatives:

What do we do when individual cases become official statistics?

  • Reports get compiled and published until enough people get sufficiently shocked by big enough numbers.
  • Social clout counts and online influence matters! 

More

ETHICS and JUSTICE PANELS for Public Accountability – to include Councillors, AMs, MPs and MEPs

8 Comments

Belarusian Easter Eggs

Ever since I began to publish cases as stories, I had to notice that public accountability is lacking so sadly and seriously.

I now think that only new bodies of governance can provide the necessary overview. They need to cut across all corridors of power and have one aim of unison: ethics and justice.

ETHICS and JUSTICE PANELS for PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY should comprise

  • local councillors to ensure that their employees do the right thing;
  • regional representatives to ensure consistency across councils;
  • MPs to ensure national cohesion and feedback;
  • MEPs to enforce compliance with international treaties.

In the wake of Brussels, where we, as the Association of McKenzie Friends presented our petition to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent, we have the bad news of:

Before going to Brussels, his contact was cut short from 90 to 45 minutes, after Emyr told his children he’d be going to Brussels.

Upon his return, John Hemming MP published this Early Day Motion in defence of of the Pedros and Emyr:

The other day, Emyr turned up for contact to celebrate his son’s birthday.

  • They never turned up at Contact.
  • Anne Grace SS Manager tried to say she did not know anything about it.

Police were informed that they were in breach of an order twice. More

WHY BRITAIN is no longer safe: in ‘link language’ and bullet points

21 Comments

The Independent has been there:

but also the Guardian:

In my experience of shifting emphasis from organising meetings at Westminster to web publishing, here’s why Britain is no longer safe – in ‘link language’ and bullet points:

  1. Starting with the Sudeley Bankruptcy and its Contemporary Significance: fraudulent bankruptcies, home repossessions and false imprisonments
  2. Punishment without Crime – Bereavement without Death – with over 36,300 visits since April 2012.

SECRECY @ Home = International Concerns and Scandal: especially in Nigeria & Belgium

12 Comments

At the demo outside Downing StreetChristopher Booker keeps covering in The Telegraph what’s happening in Family Courts to ruin families’ lives.

Over 1,500 people signed that their secrecy should be lifted now.

In that spirit, he writes:

But The Times and the Daily Mail thought that this secrecy is being lifted by judges publishing some judgements – after secret hearings. A day later, Martin Narey claims that Family courts don’t take enough children into care, while parents and grandparents are protesting and petitioning all over the country! Look at this Dossier of Evidence!

Hence we are neither amused nor do we agree with the mainstream press. And we are far from alone. Ian Josephs, veteran watchdog of child snatching since the 1960s, writes:

“The justice dealt out  by family courts will still be vastly inferior to that of the criminal courts, until the two are bound by the same rules. In my opinion,that is precisely what should happen. I make 12 points to illustrate this:-

  1. Judges will still find “compelling reasons” not to publish controversial judgements. Their judgements are 99% in favour of local authorities so parents views will NOT be published.
  2. The public(including grandparents and relatives of parents) will still be excluded from family courts.
  3. Mothers whose babies have been taken at birth will still be threatened with jail if they” go public”. Forced adoption will uniquely in the UK continue “big time” as a major government target.
  4. More children will still be taken for emotional abuse (or risk of it !) than those removed for both sex abuse and physical abuse added together.
  5. The media will still be forbidden to name parents who want to protest openly and publicly, waive anonymity like rape victims and use their own names.
  6. Children taken into care will still have their mobiles and laptops confiscated to isolate them from family and friends. Conversation with visiting parents will still be strictly censored.
  7. Children in care receiving visits will still be forbidden to report to parents abuse by fosterers, care workers or social workers, and nearly half will still end up in jail or as sex workers.
  8. Agencies like Barnardos and N.F.A (founded by 2 social workers and sold for £130million+) will still make fortunes from recruiting fosterers and adoptive parents.
  9. Many foreign visitors who are single parents here for a holiday or to meet with relatives will if accused by uk social services of neglect etc be prevented from returning home to face social services in their homelands  and  their children will still be taken for forced adoption in the UK.
  10. Pregnant women fleeing the UK before any court proceedings start will still be tracked down in foreign countries by the SS who will often start proceedings abroad to recover the children  for forced adoption or long term fostering in the UK.
  11. Judges will continue to issue injunctions forbidding parents who have committed no crime from contacting directly or indirectly their own children for periods of many years.
  12. PUNISHMENT WITHOUT CRIME will continue to be inflicted on parents, as experts (described as hired guns in Prof Jane Ireland’s report for the government)predict risk of harm to children who are then adopted.

Nothing much will change…..

THE JUDGES KNOW THE SYSTEM IS ROTTEN BUT THEY DO NOT WANT TO REFORM.”

Furthermore:

The titles of recent articles by Christopher Booker in The Telegraph make it also clear:

And then there is the Nigerian press debating the rights of girls to be a child rather than become bride: 

Remember that the worst of all child snatching cases is the Nigerian family whose seven children were taken: five at home, one after the birth in hospital, one in prison – for the parents were sentenced to seven years imprisonment – in the most farcical of all staged court cases – with a rigged jury!

And here’s the latest video by Nigel Cooper whose daughter was kidnapped from Belgium.
 

OUR ‘child protection’ system is an international scandal: House of Commons, Downing St and Nigeria

19 Comments

A Latvian and Dutch parent whose children were stolen by the UK

It’s either sex or money or both that are the reasons and explanations for what we’ve been observing in the ‘care’ system:

John Hemming MP’s meeting in the House of Commons with representatives from 30 Embassies resulted in More

VOTING with our Mouse: House of Commons Meeting for Early Day Motions and Petitions

6 Comments

THIS VIDEO of our meeting with John Hemming MP on 02/07/2013 in Committee Room 14 was based on this list of questions addressing Secrecy – the Cloak for Criminality?

Besides helping each other, solutions seem to be

  • Private Prosecutions – to get justice in individual cases – such as Michael Doherty
  • Judicial Reviews – to hold public bodies to account – such as the one we have just submitted
  • Protest – as this barrister recommended in a meeting about the erosion of civil rights…

Also our online petitions with their most interesting comments

And Early Day Motions (EDMs) – for our MPs to sign – by finding them with WriteToThem.com:

While we were talking about the Mental Capacity Act and Forced Adoptions, retired BA pilot Len Lawrence produced the video below to expose the Court of Protection and its wrongdoings: making medical and financial decisions such as the sale of his house for his ‘protection’ – under value:

  • he was made HOMELESS
  • his ex-wife got 85% of the sale, he got 15%
  • after £100,000 went to lawyers.

Might a video on YouTube stand more of a chance to get justice and compensation for victims than our paper submissions to Kenneth Clarke and Vince Cable four years ago?

Secrecy cloaks white collar criminals to snatch children, steal assets and deprive people of their liberty, often in bright daylight and under the disguise of ‘justice’.

Regarding the Official Solicitor and Adoptions without Parental Consent a Nottingham Law Firm publishes:

1. Learning Disabilities Case – reporting on the ‘stupid mum case’ on 17 June 2009 in the Nottingham Evening Post:

  • the ‘expert’ claimed she had learning difficulties – which was “complete rubbish and ludicrous”, as John Hemming MP said.

2. Sunday Times Article 14th June 2009: More ‘stupid’ mothers prevented from fighting adoptions

  • I will continue to fight the adoption and am taking my case to the European Court of Justice.” Ms Pullen …
  • New figures show that hundreds of parents have had the official solicitor, currently Alastair Pitblado, imposed.
  • Since January 2006 his department has been brought in to represent 588 parents deemed to “lack the mental capacity” to instruct lawyers in cases where their children faced the possibility of adoption.

 3. BBC on 7 April 2013: Majority of ‘deprivation of liberty’ cases unreported, says report

Figures suggest around 7,000 people were deprived of their liberty without procedures being followed. Limits placed on the freedom of people with dementia or brain injuries are not being properly recorded, according to a healthcare regulator.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) said almost two-thirds of applications to restrict a person’s liberty were not reported to it, as required by law. In some cases, patients had their freedom removed for months at a time. Almost 12,000 applications were made to restrict people’s liberty between April 2011 and March 2012, an increase of 57% in two years. But in England the CQC found only 37% of cases were properly recorded last year.

As a result, around 7,000 people were deprived of their liberty in a way that did not follow procedure.

No wonder, John Hemming MP has been interested in ‘secret prisoners‘ for a long time… And you, will you sign, reblog, tweet, like, share or even more???

E.g. you could join us at a Court Hearing on Wednesday, July 10th or the demo on July 19th outside Downing Street to Return the Stolen Children of the UK! Do we need to wait until children die, go missing or find their parents via Facebook???

SECRECY – the Cloak for Criminality? Meeting John Hemming MP on Tuesday July 2nd

5 Comments

English: Human Rights logo: "FREE AS A MA...

English: Human Rights logo: “FREE AS A MAN” esp ->svg Français : Logo pour les droits de l’homme : « Free as a man ». Русский: Свободен как человек, победитель в международном конкурсе логотипа, символзириюущего Прав человека, http://humanrightslogo.net/ (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Secrecy of Family Courts links to the Secret Prisoners who have been of interest to John Hemming MP for a long time.

But as our civil rights are being diminished more and more, we need to learn yet more to stand our ground and know that we are not alone.

By connecting with other victims, we become ‘starfighters’ and campaigners, McKenzie Friends, online activists and Public Interest Advocates.

On July 2nd we have the opportunity to meet in the House of Commons again – in Committee Room 14 – from 10 to 12am – and network in the Jubilee Cafe afterwards.

More on http://bit.ly/10hAs2u and http://www.meetup.com/victims-unite/ to formulate questions and register.

OPEN CORPORATES – a new Resource for Victims of Child Snatchers & other White Collar Criminals

13 Comments

13 05 23 Open Corporateswww.OpenCorporates.com calls itself “The Open Database of the Corporate World.” It shows the nightmare that David Korten wrote about in 1995: When Corporations Rule the World, especially when you look at Goldmann Sachs and similar ‘corporate constructs’ with oodles of legal entities devoid of personal response-ability.

My real question is: how many of these companies belong to the financial economy, just making money out of money and how many constitute the real economy, providing actual goods and services? But that can’t be established yet.

Meanwhile, however, I have found out that there are

SECRECY: the Cloak of Criminality? Who can do what about it?

20 Comments

12 06 17 secret childWhen John Hemming MP joined us at our Westminster meeting in January 2011, to explore a Public Inquiry into White Collar Crimes, I knew that ‘secret prisoners‘ were his ‘pet subject':

  • the use of the Court of ‘Protection‘ to steal the assets of mainly elderly people, by declaring them ‘not to have capacity’ to instruct solicitors
  • as a result, people are secretly imprisoned.

At the time, I did not know as much about secret family courts as I wish I  never needed to learn:

  • secret family courts are used to sanction and ‘legalise’ the child snatching carried out by Social Services – supposedly in the ‘best interest of the child’
  • I launched Stop Forced Adoptions in the UK as an online petition that non-UK MEPs want to take further in Brussels, as soon as 2,000 signatures are reached
  • I re-vamped Ian Josephs’ www.forced-adoption.com into Punishment without Crime, as he has been advising between 3 and 6 parents a day since the sixties.

Now I have seen how extra secrecy was used in a family court case:  More

New South Wales Parliament apologises for Forced Adoptions

5 Comments

The article Parliament apology on forced adoptions accepted, but mothers still feel hurt is a second interesting ‘precedent’ from New South Wales (NSW). At the time, babies were taken from unmarried mothers!

In 1996, the Royal Commission into NSW Police took place which resulted in reports on corruption, reform and paedophilia.

Here, 91 MPs are recommending a Royal Commission, by having signed this Early Day Motion.

What if the UK Parliament

  1. acknowledged that forced adoption is a punishment without crime and the removal of babies at birth a violation of human rights?
  2. apologised for all wrongful adoptions and promised to re-investigate?
  3. contacted all children and invited them to “Post Adoption Resource Centres” to process their traumatic separations?
  4. compensated all parents for the grief and trauma of institutional abuse?
  5. considered re-investigating over-zealous Social Services‘ decisions of children in ‘care’?
  6. took an active interest in John Hemming MP’s Family Justice Bill that will be debated on October 26th? More

Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,722 other followers