It’s official: British corruption is more common than recognised, report warns

23 Comments

Here’s the article in The Telegraph and here’s the original report by Transparency International, the global coalition against corruption. Its 2-year study Money, Politics, Power: Corruption Risks in Europe makes nine headline recommendations for the UK and can be read online here.

The most pertinent ones I can subscribe to from my observation of victims of white collar crimes:

  1. in the Judiciary corruption is ‘very strong’ and the worst of all institutions analysed
  2.  given the links between overseas corruption and corruption with the uK, the role of the Government’s Anti-Corruption Champion (ACC) should be extended to cover corruption within the UK. The ACC should provide an annual report to Parliament
  3. a high-level response is needed to tackle corruption more effectively
  4. politicians, government, business and institutions throughout the UK urgently need to understand and accept that corruption is a problem in key sectors
  5. NHS, social housing and prison service are mentioned specifically, besides sports!

More

Wood Green in London: a Court of fair trials and justice or partiality and corruption?

7 Comments

NEWS RELEASE                                                                                02 June 2012

Victims Unite[i] is a website dedicated to being a voice for victims of financial exploitation and legal oppression. It opened in August 2010 and has had over 109,000 visits since.

This week, Wood Green Court will unite one of the worst bankruptcies and the worst of all child snatching cases.

One of the earliest cases published was Mr Ebert’s bankruptcy[ii], in book form as The Forensics of Legal Fraud[iii]. It is believed to be one of the worst in terms of financial value and legal cover-up.

Mr Ebert’s trial will take place in Wood Green Crown Court: on Wednesday, 6th and Thurssay, 7th June, at 10.15am, Court 8 with Judge Ader and two Magistrates. It brings to light astonishingly negligent (if not criminal) behaviour of major institutions that we rely on to feel secure in our homes.

Every person in the UK can potentially be affected by the outcome of this trial. For it will either acknowledge or bury the solid evidence that this Litigant in Person is bringing into Court to test the “beyond reasonable doubt” Rule of Law that needs to be applied in criminal court cases.

More

Next court hearing of Mr Ebert in a criminal court

86 Comments

This trial is to establish that that ‘dark forces’ in our society are controlling

1. the HM LAND REGISTRY
2. the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS)
3. HM METROPOLITAN POLICE (MET)
4. HM COURT SERVICES (HMCS)
5. the LEGAL PROFESSION.

Specifically, acts of perjury, forgery, fraud and money laundering have been used for the obtaining of property by deception.

Mr Ebert has been labelled ‘vexatious litigant’ and been banned from all courts.

However, in this trial, the CPS are prosecuting him for a criminal offence: he sprayed something on the house that was taken from him fraudulently. This 13-page document tells you more.

Please phone him on 020 8905 5209 for more details and look at Next Court Hearings on the Citizens’ Cyber Court that we’re slowly setting in motion.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,466 other followers