“The Germans are called brutal, the Spanish cruel, the Americans superficial, and so on; but we are perfide Albion, the island of hypocrites, the people who have built up an Empire with a Bible in one hand, a pistol in the other, and financial concessions in both pockets. Is the charge true? I think it is.”
It’s this hypocrisy that gets to me. The “in the interest of the child” that ignores
the traumatisation every separation causes a child
It’s up to grandmothers to right the wrong-doings of younger people who are ‘just doing their job’. In the case of the two Slovak boys who were supposed to be adopted, she organised demos outside the UK Embassy in Bratislava which TV and press took up in Slovakia.
Now, Belgium TV has aired the story thanks to Nigel Cooper who is a Belgian resident since he came to work there as a NATO Security Specialist. However, he has since been banned from the UK as he explains in this video. His story was on Belgian news in June 2012, starting at 21:15 of this video. The program points out:
the secrecy surrounding family courts including the ban of media reporting
the claim that the father consented to what he calls abduction
John Hemming MP NOT having confidence in the judgements of Social Services: “they make a lot of mistakes.”
Reproducing footage of the French film, these Belgian videos are in support of his daughter – which is of course representative of many, many other ‘cases’: aired on 12th March 2013
Broadcast on 15th March 2013 but not visible in the UK: More
My late husband used to say that whatever the Government sets up, it achieves the opposite. That’s why I entitled these slides: Child ‘Protection’ or Child Snatching? – My Story as a Web Publisher for this webinar. Here’s a recording. You sign on as a guest adding your name but don’t use the name Guest. Use your own – (No password is needed) and click the play arrow in the middle of the screen and it will play for you.
It takes Dr Sheida Oraki’s intelligence and persistence, Diane Mitchell‘s experience with solicitors from hell (or nearby) and Maurice Kirk‘s camera (and banner) to get this photo taken some time ago!
With my German sense of structure, I am now re-organising the site into Punishment and Crime and discover many gems of information, e.g.
this extract from “The Times” April 13th 2010!
“Lord Justice Wall (the most senior family court judge) said that the determination of some social workers to place children in an “unsatisfactory care system” away from their families was “quite shocking”.
In a separate case on which Sir Nicholas Wall also sat, Lord Justice Aikens described the actions of social workers in Devon as
“more like Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China than the West of England” !
Here’s the story as told by the Yorkshire Press in May 2009:
A YORKSHIRE author is facing financial ruin after losing an employment tribunal where substantial costs were awarded against her.
Sonia Seerani, 45, has been told by a legal adviser the circumstances of her case were highly unusual after a judge invited her former employer, Sheffield Council, to recover costs from her.
The situation has also had a detrimental effect on her health, she said, including blood pressure being so high it had affected her vision.
This high blood pressure eventually resulted in a coma that lasted for nine months. She has not recovered health-wise yet…
But who cares??? Who would dream about fair trials and compensation?
Yuppee: in her Review of Child Protection, Professor Eileen Munro recommends a way of monitoring Social Services!
Not by a General Social Care Council, as The Times editor Camilla Cavendish recommended in 2009, but by OFSTED, the Office for Standards, in Education, Children’s Services and Skills, whose job it is to determine ratings for local councils.
May the fear of inspection instill some sense into Social Services!
Already I have managed to scare one of their outfits such that they ‘threaten’ to return three children, if only the parents agree not to have contact with me or three other helpers! A “conditional” victory!…
This trial is to establish that that ‘dark forces’ in our society are controlling
1. the HM LAND REGISTRY
2. the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS)
3. HM METROPOLITAN POLICE (MET)
4. HM COURT SERVICES (HMCS)
5. the LEGAL PROFESSION.
Specifically, acts of perjury, forgery, fraud and money laundering have been used for the obtaining of property by deception.
Mr Ebert has been labelled ‘vexatious litigant’ and been banned from all courts.
However, in this trial, the CPS are prosecuting him for a criminal offence: he sprayed something on the house that was taken from him fraudulently. This 13-page document tells you more.
The day when #paedobritain and #stopabusenow were trending.
Mental Health Warning
It is an agreed policy among 'victims turned starfighters' that anybody who attacks either this site or its contributors, will be blocked without any warning.
Slander is not tolerated. Anonymity is only acceptable by victims who are afraid of yet more victimisation.
This site is meant to help victims and train rescuers such that they can become effective McKenzie Friends for Litigants in Person.
With this button you can donate to the Victims Fund via PayPal. It serves to cover internet costs and to help victims emotionally, mentally, legally and financially.