May 17, 2012
Aung San Suu Kyi, European Court of Human Rights, Habeas Corpus, John Pilger, Justice, Nelson Mandela, Police state, Protesting, Richard Nixon, The Rule of Law, United States, WikiLeaks
This article by John Pilger is pretty frightening unless it triggers some feelings of outrage in you and you act on these kind of premises:
- the US have launched a permanent war and a police state is consuming Western democracy
- in Britain, on instructions from the CIA, secret courts are to deal with “terror suspects”. Habeas Corpus is dying.
- as the law is politicised and Americanised, travesties are not untypical.
May the web and the net help us – besides the conscience that, I think, we are all born with!
June 14, 2011
Advocacy, Campaigning, Crown Prosecution Service, European Convention of Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, France, Her Majesty's Courts Service, Hip replacement, Judges, judicial remedy, Justice, Law Enforcement, Medical record, Miscarriage of justice, National Health Service, NHS, Police harassment, Public Interest, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, Rule of law, South Wales, South Wales Police, Stephen Glover, Taking the Law in our Own Hands, The Rule of Law, The rule of money
Maurice Kirk’s saga is enshrined in a room full of files. No comparison to Mr Ebert’s suitcase of documents!…
Recently Maurice followed Mr Ebert’s model of WANTED posters to pinpoint those judges whose judgments have affected his life most detrimentally.
In the light of what judges do in family courts, Stephen Glover wrote Judges are unelected, out of touch and shockingly arrogant.
Recently, Maurice and I completed this text as a summary of his odyssey and he said “this is still worth breathing for” – at 66, recovering from a hip replacement carried out in France, for the NHS refused to release the medical records without which his surgical team wouldn’t operate… More
May 31, 2011
EU, Human Rights Convention
Council of Europe, EU, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, European Union, European Union law, Fundamental Rights Charter, Human rights, Human Rights Act 1998, Human Rights Convention, Member State of the European Union
Dear Ms McNeill,
Thank you for your reply of 2 December 2010 in which you emphasise that you are not looking for the Commission to intervene on individual cases but rather you are asking the Commission to close the gap between the EU Fundamental Charter for Human Rights and the UK Human Rights Act 1998.
As a matter of principle, the Commission’s powers regarding acts and omissions by Member States are limited to overseeing the application of Union law, under the control of the Court of Justice (cf. Article 17(1) TEU). The Commission would recall that, according to Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the provisions of the Charter are addressed to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law. For this reason, the Commission is not in a position to address the relation between the UK Human Rights Act and the Charter.
Anyone who considers that any of her or his fundamental rights have been violated may lodge a complaint with the Council of Europe’s European Court of Human Rights (Council of Europe, 67075 Strasbourg-Cedex, France). Please note, however, that the Court may only deal with a matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted.
Head of Unit