PRISONS, POLICE and COURTS in meltdown. What next when you look at the True McCann story?

4 Comments

Originally posted on Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police:

A Place for Paedophiles

A Place for Paedophiles (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Joining the dots is an interesting exercise: the deeper you go, the more shocked and amazed you ‘get. Over this weekend I ‘processed’

1. I wondered if I ended up killing myself in jail

  • an article in The Independent on Sunday about having been inside where not only Maurice has been unlawfully and innocently since 14 October 2013, but also Brian Pead since 14 May 2014.

2. As long as this police chief stays, paedophiles and sex abusers will get away with it, writes Simon Danczuk MP in the Daily Mail

3. How the Court of Protection left a 94-year old without savings or dignity

View original 216 more words

WHEN JUSTICE VANISHES and the Rule of Law erodes, Self-Help arrives thanks to the net

9 Comments

Institute of Race Relations

Institute of Race Relations (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Amazing, there is secrecy where there could be transparency:

1. Secrecy in Family Courts

  • we’ve long campaigned and petitioned and Sir James Munby has made the difference
  • Belinda McKenzie attended the hearing on 23 May 2014 in Watford where HHJ Parker announced proudly on behalf of her colleagues that this was a ‘public’ hearing of a family court;

2. Justice vanishes: the Erosion of the Rule of Law is an article published by the Institute of Race Relations. I received the link from mojuk AT mojuk.org.uk – John O provides this News Service about Miscarriages of Justice in the UK (MOJUK). It refers to

  • a criminal court hearing being heard in secret – presumably not the one and only one
  • secret evidence – presumably not the first time either
  • and secrecy in inquests – which is something I’ve come across before as well.

But who cares???

Help4Lips do! They help Litigants in Person (LiPs) stay out of court by giving access to information:  More

WOULD YOU SEND a 1 year-old American baby girl from peaceful UK to war-zone Ukraine?

12 Comments

BREAKING NEWS ~ UKRAINIAN STORY

The identities of all in this piece are for the moment concealed, pending the judge’s decision on Monday

Would you send a 1 year-old American baby girl from peaceful UK to war-zone Ukraine?

This is the decision with which an Appeal Court Judge will be wrestling in her chambers on Monday 3rd March, having before her the application brought by a UK-based American father (F) for Permission to Appeal against the Leave granted last month by a High Court Judge to his UK-based Ukrainian partner (mother/M) to Permanently Remove their 1 year-old baby daughter (B) to the Ukraine.

F works for a UK-registered company and M has been a student since coming to live in UK nearly 10 years ago. They met in London in April 2010 and separated in August 2013 as an admitted result of M’s parents (maternal grandparents/MGPs) forcing M and F apart for the third time, when B was 9 months old. In September M applied to the court for an ex-parte non-molestation order using a witness statement in which M admitted in court she had made major false allegations.  Since receiving this order, B has been in exclusive care of the MGPs & M with F being permitted contact a maximum of 1.5 hours, once per week until November, when the Judge ordered contact be increased to twice per week.  Despite the orders of the High Court, M has manipulated the situation to curtail contact so dramatically, that B has only been able to see her Father about 50% of the time prescribed by the court.

M now wishes to return with B to live with her parents permanently in Kiev, at which point F will have no further contact with his daughter. More

JOHN HEMMING MP recommends: Flee the Country because you can’t have a Fair Trial

134 Comments

At long last: BBC Breakfast is reporting! John Hemming MP says:

The process is soo unfair, parents should flee the country!

The Government says:

The reform of family justice is of critical priority. They want new standards for expert witnesses and better outcomes. 

But who looks at the ORIGIN of the problem? At the CAUSE and GENESIS?

What is worse:

  • that Social Services are malicious,
  • that ‘experts’ make mistakes
  • or that the judiciary doesn’t give you fair trials?

Too little too late, as ever…

But: more tonight on the Panorama special I Want My Baby Back! John Sweeney investigates the secretive world of the family courts - a tiny reflection of the real truth and the true realities we know…

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

#unethical #wombscandal ESSEX COUNCIL’s criminal collusion: Social Workers, Police, Doctors, Judges and Mental Health Staff

15 Comments

13 12 02 Womb ScandalThey thought they would get away with it, once again:

Even journalists and professional investigators can’t believe it!…

But I shall talk about the US mother to Sonia Poulton on the PeoplesVoiceTV today. Melissa was deported on 12 September in a wheelchair and has been homeless since, so that her only son could be adopted – courtesy of Barnet Council.

RETURN Our Stolen Children! – What Can We Do? – Our Battle against Judges who ignore the Law

17 Comments

David Jenkins, the organiser of Stolen Children of the UK [S.C.O.T. UK] the 8-day demo outside Downing Street in July 2013 is now in HMP Swansea.

He has had 4 children taken and handed in signatures with a petition that was published in Hansard on 03 September 2013: Children Placed in Foster Care.

Dear Mr Cameron, take the Lead and Return our Stolen Children was the cover letter of our file.

David is now in prison for having named one of the Social Workers involved, even though Lord Justice Munby has made this breakthrough judgement in which he appeals to courts to adapt to the realities of the internet, particularly social media! That includes naming Social Workers!

BUT: as Christopher Booker writes in The Telegraph: Why do our judges in family courts ignore the law? — How can any sane judge decide that a child should remain in ‘care’ of a blind 80-year old widow? Is it coincidence that it’s the same judge who decided that it is up to the ‘discretion of Barnet Council’ whether there should be any contact between a 4-year-old boy and his mother? He has not seen her since December 2011 and she has been deported so that he can be adopted

It is our and Lord Justice Munby’s battle against judges who don’t obey the Law of the Land. No wonder, Belinda McKenzie writes regular Battle News for Britain’s children.

Meanwhile we handed out this leaflet at today’s Empowerment Monday:

RETURN our STOLEN CHILDREN[1]

Parents and Supporters at Empowerment Mondays[2]
and via a Petition in the House of Commons[3]

Social Services take children off their parents for all sorts of frivolous reasons, such as ‘risk of emotional harm’. They hide behind the secrecy of Family Courts[4] who sanction the wrong doing. More

I WANT TO SING, I Want to Scream, I Want to Shout: Parents and Grandparents Unite!

14 Comments

This video tells the story of one of the many mothers, parents and grandparents with pictures that tell 1,000 words and lyrics that ought to be taken to heart!

AND: there’s hope:

  1. Please write and talk to your MP about our petition before the House of Commons Children Placed in Foster Care and whether s/he supports you; this is a first step towards ‘ethical elections’ for an ‘ethical Parliament’!
  2. Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, made this remarkable judgement re Baby J on 27 June 2013, thanks to the Father who dared to video how the baby was taken and used Facebook to blame Staffordshire Council,
  3. This judgement made news recently:

Paragraph 32 says: 

It is vital that public confidence in the family justice system is maintained or, if eroded, restored. There is a clear and obvious public interest in maintaining the confidence of the public at large in the courts. It is vitally important, if the administration of justice is to be promoted and public confidence in the courts maintained, that justice be administered in public – or at least in a manner which enables its workings to be properly scrutinised – so that the judges and other participants in the process remain visible and amenable to comment and criticism. This principle, as the Strasbourg court has repeatedly reiterated, is protected by both Article 6 and Article 10 of the Convention. It is a principle of particular importance in the context of care and other public law cases.

Use this judgement! Refer to it – together with the letter of the Minister who keeps repeating: the Law is clear. We just must make sure that the law is ADHERED to and COMPLIED with!!!


Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,729 other followers