ENDING secret family court hearings or STARTING an inquiry into child abuse, what’s the priority?

18 Comments

Daily Mail

Daily Mail (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Is it going to be a hot summer with judges and barristers wanting to be understood, as this Daily Mail article about Sir James Munby‘s plans suggests? The Daily Mail is proud to ‘campaign’ against the secrecy of family court hearings, but their articles go only skin deep, as a child is being taken every 20 minutes, according to Channel IV’s program on adoption: 15,000 kids and counting.

Or is it the growing number of MPs (currently 91) who are demanding a national inquiry into organised child abuse that is going to make a difference to national and international acrobatics in saving and losing face?

These are posts in support:

Seven petitions are listed on E-Petition for Public Enquiry into organised Child Grooming, Child Prostitution and Paedophilia in the UK

  • The first one on the Public Enquiry has currently 2, 178 signatures.

One commentator asks

More

German – British Musings about ‘The Rule of Law’ and its Enforcement – on a Rainy Sunday

7 Comments

Bernard Reemtsma may sound familiar to smokers, especially German ones. But Stuart Wilkie, formerly a ski racer with a spinal injury and Chairman of the Justice Society in Scotland, is now fighting a man who claims to have that name in Norfolk. Mr Reemtsma seems to have paid a few people to get what he wants, never mind his neighbours: he wants their land and their house.  What does it take to do so?

In a nutshell:

  1. pay people to use brute force and a bulldozer to remove a fence
  2. pay lawyers
  3. bribe Court staff,  Judges and the Land Registry to ignore the Rule of Law
  4. ask for us McKenzie Friends to come to the rescue…

In 2 pages here.

Then there is this English Patriot in Germany Mike James who published rather explosive material in 2004. I found it, after it had been suggested to me that Bush blackmailed Blair into Iraq and Afghanistan by threatening to publish the UK list of some 763 “VIP Paedophiles”. Thus I can guide readers to

Demanding Investigation into Social Services snatching children under false pretences

6 Comments

Family Courts and incompetent expert witnessesIt’s sooo difficult for people to think the unthinkable and believe the unbelievable: that Social Services are there to SNATCH children for all sorts of purposes, and definitely incentivised by money.

To make this more ‘acceptable’, I compiled key articles from mainstream media. But that still hasn’t been enough to change!

John Hemming is the only MP who consistently makes all sorts of efforts to make change happen.

So people make their own demands on Facebook, YouTube and WordPress. When will it be enough, I wonder???

What has to happen for ‘orders from above’ to stop this child snatching aka state kidnapping that is sanctioned by judges in family and even criminal courts?

Yet another class of victims: servicemen who don’t get pensions they are entitled to

7 Comments

MoDPensions.com only tells one story that is representative of how many servicemen???

The Committee on Standards in Public Service thinks that everything is hunky dory, but does invite the general public to provide input. The Nolan principles that public servants should act on are: Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty, Leadership.

If all that was operational, I wouldn’t have to publish most of my websites for Victims of Fraud! I wouldn’t have had to send this email either:

Dear Sir Christopher

Re: Ethics and Best practice – what works?

It is with great pleasure that I read about your invitation to the public to express views and experiences regarding Ethics and Best practice and learned about the seven principles Selflessness – Integrity – Objectivity – Accountability – Openness – Honesty – Leadership. I’m afraid they make me laugh, given my experiences…

More

Invitations to Online Activists: Abolish the City, Inquiry into Policing and Restore Magna Carta!

13 Comments

City of London CorporationThis excellent news came as a text message from journalist Tony Gosling: John McDonnell MP has tabled an Early Day Motion about the abuse of power by the City of London Corporation:

That this House congratulates the Bureau of Investigative Journalism for its thorough research in exposing the abuse of power by the City of London Corporation in using its public resources in a multi-million pound lobbying exercise to distort Government policies, in particular its tax regime, in the interests of the banks and finance houses that control the City Corporation through its undemocratic electoral system based on the business vote; and calls on the Government to instigate an urgent independent inquiry into the role and influence of the City Corporation with the aim of bringing forward proposals for its abolition.

Everybody who knows that and how we’ve been trying to redress the imbalance between Westminster and the City since 1998 will know that this brings a smile on my face!

What can you do? Ask your MP to sign the EDM by using WriteToThem.

And while you’re emailing your MP, check whether they are one of the 91 MPs who signed the request for a Royal Commission on Policing.

More

Ban on filming in law courts to be lifted – too late for or because of Norman Scarth?

7 Comments

Ken Clarke says decision to allow sentencing to be televised will increase public confidence in justice system

Well, given the comments by petition signers, it seems to take much more than televising summaries to increase public confidence in the justice system. Please check

  1. a one-page news release
  2. an eight-page executive summary
  3. and a 47-page full report produced from comments by signers of the petition Free WWII Veteran Norman Scarth from Leeds Prison

John Hemming MP has launched Parliamentary Inquiry into Injunctions

Leave a comment

The two gagging orders, that I have received against “The Media & Others” by two local Councils, are in the collection that John Hemming MP is putting before the Justice Committee for further investigation.

“What is clear,” he said, “is that almost all of the super and hyper injunctions have no public judgment. That means that they are not compliant with the rules for a fair trial.

New type of injunction – the Quaeroinjunction
Mr Hemming has also revealed a new type of injunction against investigative journalism.
“I have recently seen a gagging order that prevents people seeking information about a case from the parties. This goes a step further than preventing people speaking out against injustice. It also puts any investigative journalist at risk if they ask any questions of a victim of a potential miscarriage of  justice.”
I call this the Quaeroinjunction, after the Latin work “to seek”. I don’t think this should be allowed in English courts. It has the effect of preventing journalists from speaking to people subject to this injunction without a risk of the journalist going to jail. That is a recipe for hiding miscarriages of  justice.

Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,725 other followers