A Jury of 2067 Signers watching over Norman’s Court Hearing today

Besides the supporters who will physically be in Court 28 today, the number of petition signers has gone up to 2067 this morning!

The latest collection of their comments goes only up to 1701 but is available here.

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Publicity and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to A Jury of 2067 Signers watching over Norman’s Court Hearing today

  1. earthlinggb says:

    The government and judiciary are playing a very ugly game which will backfire on them if they do not start to play by the rules of natural justice and end their corruption. Norman Scarth is a free man who has UNLAWFULLY been incarcerated by a CORPORATION who wish, simply, to control while ignoring the fundamental human rights of anyone who begins to understand how their game is being played.

  2. earthlinggb says:

    The Court is acting upon the LEGAL PERSON (A fiction/corporation) which has the title “Mr NORMAN SCARTH”. The Crown Corporation are applying THEIR policy to the legal fiction upon the presumption that Norman (the man) is acting in the capacity of a TRUSTEE (or effectively an EMPLOYEE) of the Crown Corporation whereby they can impose their policy rules upon him. This is how the “game” works. The fact is, however, that Norman needs to advise the Court that HE, in fact, is the Sole Beneficiary AND Executor of the trust or legal person known as “Mr NORMAN SCARTH”. He,then, as the effective Director of that Corporation sole is NOT a Public Servant of the Crown Corporation. He is not, therefore, obliged to follow the policy of that corporation UNLESS he so wishes to contract with them. This is a confusing issue for many people who do not recognise and have never studied the role of the birth certificate and registration of birth and how it creates such a trust. If people became aware of this and acted in their proper capacity, none of this would be happening to Norman OR to others whether they are “bankrupts” or whether they are faced with the corruption of the state family courts.
    One must ask oneself a very simple question to understand this birth certificate issue and that of the trust effected by it: WHY do you think the Social Services have the authority to steal one’s child? Because you gave them it by the registration of your child’s birth where you created the legal personality the state is acting upon. The State then continues to take these actions in the knowledge that you are unaware of this and unaware of your true power as beneficiary/grantor and administrator.

  3. Interesting comments Earthlinggb, but I am not sure I fully understand. Surely the same laws apply to persons not born in the UK and therefore those who have not had their birth registered in the UK?

    • earthlinggb says:

      Correct. The same applies in any country. One registers one’s birth but even if one doesn’t the state will assume because the state simply assumes in the vast majority’s ignorance. While one may wish to consider this whole business about Sharia law and the fact the muslims will not recognise the authority of British courts. It all ties in and the courts know it. The Crown Corporation is simply that: A Corporation. It is its own legal entity/personality and has it’s own policy. It is working under the presumption that you do not recognise that the trust you have called the legal fiction is equivalent. You have YOUR policy. It is complex and confusing to those who first encounter it BUT, at the end of the day it is very simple. The courts and banks and government are playing a deception. No-one man can enforce his policy over another just as no one group can but they do and the government/judiciary as a group do because of OUR collective ignorance. They work on that basis just as they do with the issue of currency issuance. Money is also a legal fiction and is only backed by the FAITH of the population. It is the same with the judiciary and government. Most people do not have the first clue how money is issued from nothing but on the basis of their signing a document to bring it into existence. The entire commonwealth of nations’ value is provided by you and I. We are the beneficiaries. This basic fundamental fact MUST be understood by people.

      • JM says:

        I don’t recognise the authority of British Courts either….buildings have no authority over me, neither do the violent yobs that do their bidding and the rest…
        doesn’t mean i’m a muslim though or anything else…

  4. earthlinggb says:

    Further regarding the Birth Certificate issue. Stated quite plainly within the response of a FOI Act request:

    Dear Ms Goldsmith

    Further to your request received on 25 March 2010, I confirm that Torbay
    Council has completed its search for the information that you requested.

    This information is as follows:

    1) If a parent has not registered a child’s birth, does Torbay Council
    have any ability/right to forcibly remove that child from

    the parents’ care without a parent’s permission?

    No.

    http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/right_to_any_child_with_no_birth

    I believe this may clarify and add significant emphasis to the BC claim. The State has no authority UNLESS you register your child’s birth thereby creating the trust.

  5. earthlinggb says:

    The State ACTS upon a “Legal Person” formed by the trust which is brought into effect by registration of a child’s birth. The State is ACTING upon Mr NORMAN SCARTH (Legal Person) and treating him as a TRUSTEE (or employee/public servant). It is the ONLY way they can act upon him.
    If Norman breaks their presumptions at law he is then the free man he most definitely is! However, it is a massive deception and the floodgates will open. As they should! Time to break the con/deception and have a judiciary who either act with integrity and honesty or have their judicial robes ripped from them never to act as a judge again for a deceptive Crown Corporation. This is then where Her Majesty’s Coronation Oath comes into the picture and where the deception of the unlawful (but legal in accordance with the Crown Corporation policy NOT the people of the UK’s policy) EU comes into play. The entire judiciary and British government have deceived the people for far too long.

  6. Lydia says:

    This is a set back! He should be feed immediately. Anonymus why are you attacking people on here? This is about norman, not you. If you have something constructive to say then why dont you? The last thing this campaign needs is infighting. grow up please.

  7. JM says:

    are you getting hacked/ spammed Sabine? with the random spam comemnts that’s coming through on the email lately, and not here…justw ondering what is going on?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s