Judicial Swoops or State Harassment to Avoid the Wrong kind of Publicity

Judicial Swoops

by Debra Siddons

Earlier this year, March 2011, a news story reported the deportation of two men in the U.K. Weymouth Harbour. But what this story fails to tell, is the real reason behind the swoop which is these two men were campaigners for the truth about 7/7 Ripple Effect and 9/11, and the boat is still moored with authorities demanding mooring payments by the boat’s owner in order to avoid his boat (home) being auctioned to the lowest bidder. Where is the Justice in that? Obviously there is none.

In his own words, the New Zealander explains: –

“What I would like to share with people, about what has happened to us, is the underlying reasons why we were physically removed from the boat; taken into custody and then deported from the UK, when we did nothing wrong.

The boat, which I, a New Zealand and therefore British-Commonwealth citizen, am the owner of, is a New Zealand flagged vessel and is therefore New Zealand territory when in international waters, but falls under the jurisdiction of host nations when inside that nation’s territorial waters. Under normal circumstances, if a foreign-flagged vessel enters a nation’s territorial waters and is denied entry into that nation, it is given a set time-period in which it must depart from that nation’s territorial-waters, otherwise it can be arrested. Since the boat itself is New Zealand territory when in international waters, sending it and us out of British waters would be the quickest and most efficient way of deporting us, minimizing the cost to the tax payer, who had to fork-out thousands of pounds to pay for our deportation.  But in our case, the standard refusal of entry procedure was not taken, because there were political motivations at work.

We are supporters of Mr. John Anthony Hill, who produced a documentary film titled “7/7 Ripple Effect”, which was released on the internet on 5th. November 2007 and questions the official account of the events surrounding the London tube-train and bus bombings of 7th. July 2005.

We sailed to London from Ireland to support Mr. Hill at his trial. Upon arrival in London and visiting immigration, we were told that we could not be allowed entry into the country because London was not our first port of call and that we should have cleared immigration within 24 hours of entering British waters, at our first port of call, which was the remote bird sanctuary called Lundy Island in the Bristol Channel.

Because we hadn’t done that, the Immigration officers said they therefore could not grant us entry under their rules. They then advised us to go across to Europe and then re-enter the UK again and this time clear immigration within 24 hours of our arrival.

This we did, sailing to Holland and then down the Belgium and French coasts, and then back across the channel to the UK, arriving at Weymouth.  Upon arrival at Weymouth, we contacted immigration within 24 hours of arrival as instructed, and asked for clearance to enter the country as visitors. Instead of being welcomed into the country as we had hoped, we were forcibly taken off the boat and into custody, with only the clothes we were wearing, and were quickly deported to our respective countries of origin, being denied the right to appeal the deportation.

Although it was not stated directly to us by the British authorities, the friend whom I contacted to come and take care of the boat for me was told by British customs officers who were searching the vessel when he arrived, that we were being deported from the UK because we are supporters of Mr. John Hill and that his is a politically sensitive court case, in which the state wants a minimal amount of public attention.

This was again confirmed when I landed at the Auckland International Airport in New Zealand and was clearing customs there. The customs officers took me into custody for an interview. During that interview, they stated to me that they were informed by British customs that I was a supporter of a man who is involved in a politically sensitive court case in the UK and that was the primary reason for my deportation.

So, to summarize; although it was not clearly stated to us, or officially recorded as a reason for our deportation, it has become clear that the real reason we have been taken from our home and all our worldly possessions – the boat and contents – and vindictively deported back to our respective countries of origin with nothing but the clothes on our backs, so the authorities could try to steal the boat, instead of the usual procedure of being turned-away and allowed to leave the country on the boat, is because we are supporters of a man in a trial that the authorities would rather nobody knows anything about, and they are doing everything in their power to see to it that this is so.”    – end of quotes.

John Hill has since been found not guilty and was released from prison, May 2011. But the reasons for injustice are getting harder and harder to fight in the Courts.



Right lies in Might – Politics versus Morals – The End justifies the Means – “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” – The New Aristocracy.

5. In the beginnings of the structure of society, they were subjected to brutal and blind force; after words – to Law, which is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature right lies in force.

12. Our right lies in force. The word “right” is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.

23. Our countersign is – Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty. http://jahtruth.net/illumin.htm#protocols

“You Can Jail the Truth Tellers but Never The Truth” –

A few months later, in June 2011, a similar event took place in England and this time involving Kevin Annett who was jailed, deported because his public lectures “was not an appropriate activity for visitors to that country”. “Rev. Annet was about to address a major public rally in London against child trafficking and murder by church and state when he was arrested and deported from England without due cause. UK Border officials detained Kevin at 8 pm Sunday night upon his return from speaking in the Netherlands, and deported him the next morning, after fingerprinting, photographing and jailing him in a crowded immigration prison cell.”

I recently spoke, by way of email , to the New Zealander boat owner who was deported from England in March of this year, and he kindly shared the following :-

Dear Debra,

Good morning.

I hope this finds you well, well rested, in good spirit and having a good day.

Thank you for your message; good wishes and concern.

I’m still trying to get permission from the English immigration-services to re-enter England to recover my boat.

My travel-documents are now in order so they have no reason to continue to block my entry, but they are still continuing to do-so.

It appears clear that the “authorities” are doing this purposefully to try to bankrupt us with the mooring-fees, so they can seize the boat/home and auction it for peanuts to one of their friends, just to cover outstanding mooring-fees, and in effect steal my home and all my worldly possessions.

Another example of how they like to try to make life as difficult as possible for anyone who thinks outside “the box” and specifically asks questions the government doesn’t want to answer.

As George Washington put it so well:  “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force… “

They are using whatever means available to try to force us to shut-up about their crimes of 9-11 and 7/7/2005.  – end.

This article brings attention to two cases and there are many more. I received another email today from someone entirely different telling me to have a good week but they are busy at work (for the Beast) and hope to catch up on things and news later this week. We have to survive, I understand, but for what do we strive for?

It’s not going to get better on its own, and will only get worse. I am a peaceful person and promote a peaceful solution to uphold Justice based on factual evidence. I sincerely strive to bring the True Justice to the Courts and to live justly outside of the Courts, as well. I do not seek riotous lynch mobs which I fear some consider.

Beware of WolvesBritain First.


About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Judicial Swoops or State Harassment to Avoid the Wrong kind of Publicity

  1. JM says:

    Basic Doctrine? far more eloquently put than i said it but when i said basicallythe same thing, they took away my home, most of my possessions (never had much) tried to kill me, murdered my dog, tortured me ina mental asyslum and then made damn sure i wd never have access to work/ money ever again….still harrassed tot his day, possible torture with DEW weapons…still soem physical pain….

    and as for that last line, everybody has to ‘agree’ with that for ‘legal reasons’. But realistically, what alternative is there? It all comes down to who is prepared to project the most force….they only have the power because they do the things that decent people won’t. You can’t win a war without cracking soem heads. If you’re not prepared to descend to their level then one has already lost. Evolution is violent, always has been, it wdn’t be evolution if it wasn’t….it’s not a coincidence that evolution and revolution are very similar sounding words….Thinking and talking about never achieves anything ‘cept making yourself a target….

    so whata re you prepared to do?

  2. Debra says:

    “Protocol 1 -The Basic Doctrine” is excerpted from

    How amazing is it, people can even have Illuminati plans in front of them to read, yet be duped?

    The Protocols were clearly written by Satan, if he had a pen in hand, using his followers instead.

    Thus violent revolutions are not the solution, rather enforcing Justice is, which most refuse to see.

    “Who are the ‘Elite’?”

    I was sent a link to a website that exposes evil, but really like the Protocols, simply exposes plans:

    A version of the page should be made explaining how to stop the Illuminati, the only Way with God.

    No different than an organised religion, atheism is leading many of these freedom fighting groups. Atheists are leading themselves and people into the Fire. Step aside, taking all your laws with you.

  3. peter oakes says:

    Please stop this nonsence ! There are NO English Immigration Service.
    There is No England. Just Europe.

    Stop the “conspiracy theory ” please.

    Show us one! document or better still two or three documents that establish
    9/11. London Bombings are connected in anyway.

    Where does the ” beast ” come from ?

    I think William Joyce is involved here ! Edward Kennedy, Bill Clintoff,
    Hillary Blair, and johanna plumley along with Harriet Harmonious or is it
    Harman. just dont know anymore, give us the Facts or is it Fax.

  4. Peter -that is a very cogent and well put argument
    NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. JM says:

    bloody trolls….

    justice abstract concept, but any ‘judgement’ by those with the power is enforced through violence and the threat of it, which they implement even when you capitulate…?
    that’s wht it going to take restore the balance….

    e.g. if a group got organised and then ramdomly took it in turns to put on disguises, creep up behind pigyobs and shoot them repeatedly in the ehad…..how many wd it take b4 those who murdered Jean charles were held accountable for what they did? they rule through terror and i don’t see any other way now ‘cept to put the fear bak into them….if they smash one of our windows, we smash tenof their windows, if they torture one of us we torture ten of them, if they kill one of us we kill ten of them….that is WAR mentality and they’re the one’s that insist on behaving this way…….hyper patehtically of course!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s