Next court hearing of Mr Ebert in a criminal court

This trial is to establish that that ‘dark forces’ in our society are controlling

1. the HM LAND REGISTRY
2. the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS)
3. HM METROPOLITAN POLICE (MET)
4. HM COURT SERVICES (HMCS)
5. the LEGAL PROFESSION.

Specifically, acts of perjury, forgery, fraud and money laundering have been used for the obtaining of property by deception.

Mr Ebert has been labelled ‘vexatious litigant’ and been banned from all courts.

However, in this trial, the CPS are prosecuting him for a criminal offence: he sprayed something on the house that was taken from him fraudulently. This 13-page document tells you more.

Please phone him on 020 8905 5209 for more details and look at Next Court Hearings on the Citizens’ Cyber Court that we’re slowly setting in motion.

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

86 Responses to Next court hearing of Mr Ebert in a criminal court

  1. JM says:

    if he’s banned from the all the Courts, how can they legally prosecute him for anyhting…?

  2. peter oakes says:

    It,s bloody hard work being a “victim” when such s—- comments are made.

    The authorities don,t do anything legally ! they are criminals acting illegaly!

    A vexatious litigant Sectn 42. Supreme Court Act. prevents Mr.Ebert. taking
    any civil action in any court ! it also means the police ignore any criminal
    offences WHEN Mr.Ebert is the “victim” That is what being banned from
    any court means !

    But ! it does not stop the authorities from persecuting Mr.Ebert. on false
    criminal charges ! in order to get him falsely imprisoned !

    And in todays Daily Mail the husband of Harriet Harman. has been exposed
    for serious breaches of Parliamentary codes regarding £10,000 he fiddled.

    Harriet Harman is the criminal who made Mr.Ebert a Section 42 vexatious
    litigant to conceal the theft of properties by Master of the Rolls Nueberger
    who uses the Insolvency Service, Land Registry, HM Court Service, Police
    and CPS to steal property from “Victims” like Mr.Ebert.

    Now you know why Mr.Ebert painted his name on his own house that had been stolen by the Baruch family ! and a bogus trustee yvonne venville using
    a false bankruptcy re: Meat & Fat-stock co. that somehow became Mr.Ebert.

    All the facts disappeared in a phantom case in Court 15 Southwark Crown Court. before Recorder Brigden, when the Met police say they had seen the
    bankruptcy order ! No copy of any order exists and the Land Registry in
    Swansea Office assured me Baruch enterprises, had never owned the
    property !

    This two-day trial was removed from the Public Record ( perverting jusice )

    In those two-days the Met.police. CPS. HMCS. Land Registry and Recorder
    Brigden ALL CONSPIRED in serious criminal offences with Ebert as the
    victim.! Ask Dr.Oraki. she was there sat by my side Aug 4th. Southwark
    Crown Court.

  3. JM says:

    Look, it was late…I didn’t mean to cause any offence….twas just poiting out the hypocrisy of it…call it a smart arse comment. I’m in very similar situation….I don’t know if i have had that label applied to me but the Court just totally ignores anything I try and file…so very much maybe!
    I know damn well what goes on and I don’t know the ins and outs of this particular case and I don’t want to get into who has suffered more scenario but i’ve had family killed/ dog was definately murdered, as sure as one can be, genitals mutilated, gang raped repeatedly…can barely see or walk some days and I don’t even officially exist anymore/ can’t even get a bank account and I was born in this country…..I’ve had my entire life stolen from me, not just property and lil hope of ever being allowed to rebuild it. The only way to get a name out of any of these mutherfrackers is to kill one in self defence, but pretty sure they’re g-men of some description….
    and i’m not a whiner by nature…..just the opposite!

  4. Jimmy says:

    “A vexatious litigant Sectn 42. Supreme Court Act. prevents Mr.Ebert. taking
    any civil action in any court !”

    No it doesn’t.

  5. Steve H says:

    Harriet Harperson and her sister who wasn’t “nicked” (Contempt of Court) for revealing details of a Family Court case – both have lots of ‘form’ ….. in fact they absolutely have “Firm” – form (The Firm!!! Doh!!!) and both are good examples of erring solicitors (Another word for a solicitor is a prostitute i.e. someone who prostitutes for their trade) – who have not been done – in order to protect ultimately the Firm and its Judicially corrupted – wolves in sheepskin wigs. As for a supine press and media well – The chicken feed / drop in the ocean pay offs from Murdoch to the egos celebs and MP’s goes on.

    Behind the word “vexatious” is another word; it is the false flag ‘created psychiatric disorder’ (To silence those who throw real dirt at the Firm) the word that is promulgated by the bent state is the “Querelous”. The Tavistock Institute – learnt so much from the barbaric evil men Lenin & Stalin.

  6. peter oakes says:

    Typical clap trap from Jimmy. Why do we bother ?

    A Vexatious Litigant Sect. 42. can take no proceedings in any court
    without the leave ( permission) of a judge.

    Why do we have to put up with agents of government when serious offences
    torture, oppression, theft & frauds are daily occurances ! and is Victims Unite
    worthwhile when it obtains 5 comments !

    20 people were in the House of Commons committee rooms when Mr.Ebert
    spoke out ! in front of several MPs yet these spineless victims keep stum in the hope the authorities will treat them in a kinder way.

    The jews walked into gas chambers because they were sheep ! Adolph & the Nazi,s would,nt have gassed 5 million bloody Ebert,s.

    Ebert has fought tooth & nail for ALL victims and the gutless bastards
    sit-back hoping he is successful, so that they can use the result !

    But they sit in shame, skulking away afraid to Stand their ground !

    What I have said about Harriet Harman. and bent corrupt MP Edward
    Timpson is libel ! Why dont you cowardly bastards forward them a copy
    to start the process ?

    And yes a two day trial before bent Recorder Brigden in Southwark Crown
    Court has been expunged from the record ! because Ebert proved the
    truth about Master of the Rolls Nueberger stealing properties and the
    Met copper PC Donovan perjured himself.

    Get real. because you gutless victms are going nowhere, attack is the
    best form of defence, it is also a requirement that citizens discover crime

    you get what you deserve!

    • Robert Dooran says:

      ‘The jews walked into gas chambers because they were sheep ! Adolph & the Nazi,s would,nt have gassed 5 million bloody Ebert,s.’

      I’m not Jewish but if you said that in front of me I’d punch you in the face.

  7. So Peter – you think the 5 million jews who were gassed were all sheep and you have the effrontery to suggest (by reference) that they were ‘gutless bastards’. It seems from your insinuations that you think Ebert would have saved all the Jews.

    You are a fucking disgrace for posting that last comment.

    • JM says:

      just thinking aloud though……but you’re ‘supposed’ to say 6 million these days…..i dnt know when it changed exactly, but i haven’t seen any evidence of another million corpses being dug up in Europe this past decade…..but here’s the thing though, if they have been adding roughly one million to the total every decade and you count back…..?
      point being that history is always written by some c*** called Victor. never any mention of the millions Churchill killed in bombing raids, even after we had pretty much ‘won’- mostly to intimidate the Russians! of course you’re never allowed to hear an alternative view other than what the state prescribes….someone like David Irving comes along they label him a denier and lock him up! and they call it freedom of speech……
      never any mention of the hundreds of thousands of Libyans killed in bombing raids over the past couple of decades BEFORE last years conflcit…..without ever officially declaring war on them….of course if MSM doesn’t report on it it never actually happened!
      you never ask why? why Lockerbie? why 911 thing? why do people defend themselves? duh, because they’re attacked…..and on the micro level people aren’t actually schizos if they manage to kill an illegal enemy combatant in self defence…..
      yep—we’re all looking for the messiah…..but that doesn’t happen in real ife, just on the TV and the bible for example……..yes leaders necessary for any movement but if Sheridan had been killed at Za hadoum then it would have been Gary the Baldi!
      just thinking aloud….it used to be allowed, but i refuse to stand by anything i have said for legal reasons, obiously

  8. JM says:

    and what would you know about it Robert? who are you? and what makes you think I am Jake….?

    • Robert Dooran says:

      ‘and what would you know about it Robert?’

      All of your comments are nonsensical rambling drivel and are generally offensive. Perhaps you should stop thinking aloud.

      ‘who are you?’

      Never you mind. Who are you?

      ‘and what makes you think I am Jake….?’

      Take a look out of your bedroom window……..

      • JM says:

        look robert the moron, as far as i can see you the only one being offensive…i think u need to grow a penis or soemthing…..

        Sabine- do u need to review security or soemthing or have you given this guy access to your DB? sounds like an illegal enemy combatant to me….do you log IP addresses?

  9. peter oakes says:

    The comments from the arseholes where expected and the usual drivel of
    cowards -spoilers-establishment- lickspittels ! who do their best to destroy
    the truth !

    Did you notice ? not a word about criminal Harriet Harman. Edward Timpson.
    Master of the Rolls Nueberger. thieving Baruch Family.

    Met copper Donovan. Recorder Brigden. Southwark Crown Court where
    hearings disappear ! bet Harry Rednap would like his hearing expunged
    from the record like they did to Ebert,s hearing. when he proved what
    corrupt bastards they are in HMCS.

    Sorry arseoles I know the truth and my name will be written inside your
    eyelids ! and it will be the last thing you will see in this your miserable life.

    Try forgetting it !

  10. Robert Dooran says:

    JM
    That wasn’t very nice. Nobody likes a snitch Jake.

    ‘sounds like an illegal enemy combatant to me’

    You do make me laugh. Actually I’m reptilian member of the Illuminati and I’m coming to get you mwahahaha.

    You haven’t been wearing your tin foil hat.

  11. Steve H says:

    Harry Red bung taker..knapp – whilst he makes out like a dumbo illiterate child – has no problem in filling out his “bookies slips” – he’s well known for it. He’s a known “big” gambler – Me knows that Harry speaks with-forked tongue. Once again a “theatrical act” is being played out in the courts. The Red one is a ‘protected one’. Many mass sonic types play the ‘idiot fool’ for purposes of protection.

    BTW – over 60 million people died – on all sides in WWII. Over 80 million were butchered by Stalin Lenin & Trotsky – and the figure used in previous posts here is holy incorrect itself – who amongst you all really does know their his tory? Not many by the contradictions appearing in these comments.

    • You will be OK if you go to court Steve – just take along some examples of your postings on here and you will very easily pass for the “idiot fool.”

      • Steve H says:

        You need to take a look at “your” ‘pitiful postings’ Mr NotKnowNothinAtAllLsabstyle-learner!!’ and what a contradictory fellow you are when it comes to you throwing dirt at Me and Peter Oakes. Touche saddo.

  12. Mr NotKnowNothinAtAllLsabstyle-learner!!’

    Any chance you could have a go at English for your next posting?

    • Steve H says:

      How’s this for English – In the mid 1970’s a made for TV Film – made for Americans firstly and then broadcast in the UK; had as its leading actor Anthony Hopkins. Several biographies of Hopkins’ career have been published in the press in the lats year. However every biography ‘failed to mention’ the film he starred in in the mid 1970’s – now why’s that?

      The made for TV film was based upon a book by Leon Uris – the film was called QBVII (Queens Bench Seven) it was a film about the holocaust. However!!! nobody wants to mention the film – nowadays – why’s that???

      The now discredited Shill Charlie Veitch was told about the film over a year ago and well – he’s just a discredited letch now.

      The closing scenes of the film (produced for what reason?) turned up something very odd when I watched it ‘again’ in 2009 – how odd that a reference was made to 9/11. The film was made back in the mid 1970’s !!!

      How’s that for English – Mr pathetic cantthinkatall / closed mind / blinkered idiot?

      • JM says:

        history? how would anybody know for sure unless they were there? history is always written by the victors….? never heard that? and dnt you know kids are banned from learning abt winnie churchill now and how he stood up to the nazis….so which eversion exactly did the state indoctrinate you with?

        haven’t heard of that film….doubt it will ever be on tv but i’ll look out for it!

        same anthony who said he would never make a sequel to silence of the lams aqfter all that public uproar about it….what people will do for money eh!

  13. Steve H says:

    Oh …. I forgot to mention that in that film QB VII – which “WAS SHOWN ON BRITISH TV” IN THE MID 1970’S the promulgated / propanagdised [forgive the occasSIONal spelling mistake!] figure of Jewish deaths in the holocaust was 12 million. Isn’t it interesting how statistics and figures can “get” twisted up to suit a PURPOSE or two … or three …?

    Please don’t forget that Churchshill was a gambler and owed a lot of money to some people … (HIS CREDITOR’S came a calling to the debtor) besides that he was a drunkard ….. oh and I have read his volumes of books – written “AFTER – THE EVENT – of WWII – which appear to contradict – many truths that have come to light since the downfall of socialist communism [Marxism (Bolshevism really) actually] in 1991 – ho hum – what would I know – eh….

    BTW – who knows about Harry the reds’ huge property & planning developments in and around Portsmouth? Seems he’s got the nod for himself and his mates from Portsmouth City Council!!!!!!!!! bunch of ……s

  14. Steve – what the hell are you on about – what’s your point? You need to focus man – you are all over the place. What have Anthony Hopkins’ biographers got to do with anything? His role in QB VII is clearly listed in his various filmographies, yet you are trying to make it sound like some sort of global conspiracy or something.

  15. Steve H says:

    I was expecting that sort of usual ‘reply’ from you cantthinkatall – your “form” on these kinds of matters – is “LEG end” on this website. go forth and multiply – Mr ever so “repetitively predictable and boring”.

  16. “you” ‘have’ a PECuliar “way” of writing – Mr “rather bonkers” “””Steve”””. I soME -times “wonder” what “YOU” are on about Mr idontreallyknowwhatiamonaboutsoiwillwritedrivelinstead

  17. Steve H says:

    The thread is off topic because a certain individual does not appreciate the ‘content’ of postings on here. He as usual attacks specific individuals directly and on a personal basis – he is somehow unable to add to the content of anthing herein – other than to repeat his same old same old attack method.

    If he’s the kind of poster that Sabine appreciates and amuses herself with then that doesn’t really say much for sabine’s failure to moderate pitiful men like him – but it does pose the question of Sabine’s ‘policing of her own site’ and of whether she is biased toward anyone who might offer up ‘content’ which does not suit sabines mindset. Balanced, fair …. and moderated by ‘independent’ moderators …. so far …. No – and as is evidenced in so many previous threads – where interlpoing wasters are ‘allowed continually’ to continue their personal attacks. Once “AGAIN” – I am flattered by the personal smears – which go to show – that the issues I raise must be annoying those who have to hide behind their anonymity. Jekyll & Hyde characters abound everywhere.

    • JM says:

      well, unless you’re targetted like some of us here are i do suggest you try and find yourself a girlfriend or soemthing else to spend your time on…

  18. Steve H says:

    Here is a quote which I re-read recently in Christopher Bookers book ‘The castle of lies’ – the quote is on page 164 at the start of chapter 14 and goes like this
    “You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time. Abraham Lincoln, 1858”

    Lincoln – was too honest and perhaps certain rednecks couldn’t have that – so perhaps they killed him and then proclaimed him as their great man to fool the masses? Could it have been the same with JFK? Discuss…..

  19. Steve H says:

    For good measure and the 33rd Comment – the totally corrupted and evil British Judiciary in every masonic guise that they try to hide away from – are going down – The British Spring – will soon be here and it is unstoppable and the lesser surborned pigs, MP’s, lawyer-types and the fourth estate – the Press & Media better make their minds up as to who’s side they are on this time – The publics or the privateering pirates!

  20. It’ll never happen. The British Spring is a pipe dream. The masses will never rise up when their definition of deprivation is not having the latest iPhone and everyone has a “human right” to own a Playstation!

  21. JM says:

    another, high profile case where the lawyer doesn’t do what they’re told, collaborate with the enemy an dthen expect to get paid for it…

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-01-31/wikileaks-s-assange-sued-on-eve-of-u-k-extradition-appeal.html

  22. JM says:

    i don’t own a playstation and don’t want one of those damn things!

  23. Steve H says:

    Lets predict – yet another high profile WHITEWASH. Chris Huhne MP!!!

    Tomorrow Kier Starmer will personally or via the mouthy masonic pillock with form Yates of the yard – announce that “there isn’t enough evidence” to prosecute Huhne for “perverting the course of justice” – will there be the usual garbage, bilge and waffle of a whitewash – A LA:- Blair, Powell, Levy and Ruthy’s “loans for peerages” {Yates!!!! See Lloyd George (Zionist dupe]}, Ian Tomlinson’s murder [G20 protests] or Dr David Kelly ……

    Huhne of course is a low-life, two-faced, fork-tongued lying, despicable hypocrite. And he can’t sue me because of what I did to him in Poole at a “public meeting” in 2010. A letter was published to that effect in the public domain – in my local Pravda [Bournemouth Echo] which showed what a global warming dupe he is – along with ed millipede and that tory global business money grabbing MP.

  24. Steve H says:

    I am overjoyed that the SOAB Huhne is to done for ‘perverting the course of justice’.

    Now lets have some light shone upon Gordon F Pell – an underling to Fred the shred at RBS – and Gordon’s ‘concealment of moneylaundering’ through the Hamilton Branch of RBS near Glasgow. Evidence …. I’ve got plenty of it …. including the “Signed Original letter” – by Gordon F Pell ……

    What goes around; comes around and Barclays’ Bob Diamond – ex of their share dealing ‘activities’ from Edinburgh – yank placeman mouthpiece better watch out as well – as well as all the damned lawyers and judiciary-types who “wrote up the contracts” – for these lesser vultures to “get” away with their lesser usury – whilst the ultimate banking stringpulling mob – attempt to conceal themselves off “behind communism”.

    • JM says:

      hang on a sec….just a few thoughts on this Huhne thing….does it not seem a bit odd? ten years ago? essentially gonna boil down to one person’s word against another……? Would the pigyobs really dedicate any resources to soemthing like that if it was anybody else? i mean seriously, considering the cost and the waste and the highly unlikely event of a conviction anyway…..

      would the pigyobs have even have looked into it if it weren’t for the fact that a Labour MP made a complaint…? not that i’m suggesting the poolice have a conflict of interests….considering they were effecetively getting at least 40% more resopurces every year, more powers, more weapons, less ‘wrok’, encouraged to be even more violent, paid more/ unlimited earnings…..i mean context is evrything surely? this stinks to my mind….by all accounts the guy wasn’t a pushover….so both Labour and the Conservatives wanted him out of govt…….and when you consider in the context of the crimes that Labour MP nd the Conservatives have done…..pales into insignificance surely? i don’t know the guy…maybe he is a ‘bad man’……but int he context of what Bliar, Brown, milliband and Cameron have done….I mean WTF???!!!???? i surely can’t think of any other cabinet minister that has been done away with on soemthing so flimsy…..

      • Robert Dooran says:

        ‘pigyobs’ How old are you?

        Most people don’t consider perverting the course of justice as flimsy.

        Please list the criminal offences of Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Ed Milliband.

        I notice everybody’s favourite MP is in the news again.

        http://www.sundaymercury.net/news/sundaymercuryexclusives/2012/02/05/birmingham-mp-john-hemming-expecting-fifth-child-with-lover-66331-30268419/

        What a shining example of a man he is.

      • JM says:

        i dnt answer to you or anybody else for that matter you lil p***k! and what the smeg has Hemming’s personal life got to do with you me or anybody else….? it’s just that, personal, as in private….

        but as far as that article goes….i’m still left wondering what happened to Beauty? dead? anybody know? abducted but not returned presuming there is some truth in that article….i know what it’s like to have family memebers killed and not being able to do anything about it…two humans and a dog.

        ‘Their’ crimes are well known (torture, mass murder, rape and pillage? fraud…)….most of them anyway and undoubtedly many that will never see the light of day….most also illegal by all accounts!

      • Robert Dooran says:

        JM
        There is no need to resort to bad language again.

        ‘you lil p***k!’

        Are you an American rapper?

        John Hemming is a public figure which is why there are articles in the national press about his rather colourful private life.

        http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/274321/MP-John-Hemming-s-26-affairs-by-jilted-wife-

        Is this member honorable?

      • JM says:

        bad language? who do you think you are to dictate what words that i can and can not use (that you telapathetically communicated to me, presumably) , you arrogant lil fool? your whole attitude smacks of establishment, whether you on the payroll or not….it’s exactly this kind of condescending attitude that leads to so many of the problem in this world…..live and let live? it’s now to do with you…
        and honourable? you mean like seizing on bits of a person’s personal life, taking it out of context (you dnt know thw whole story and it’s none of your business anyway) and using that as some kind of weapon to undermine someone on the assumption that everybody else agrees with your ‘morals’ (another poxy moron)?
        regardless of what you think of the man’s personal life, at most that is a civil matter between husband and wife….slarring folks personal business around for everyone to see is a crime in itself….but presumably you’re quite happy to have your medical records and any othe rpersonal info slarred all over tinternet as well? what if u were a victim or a ‘crime’…family memebers raped, tortured murdered….you’d be happy to have all the lurid details plastered all over the palce to? never heard of artcile 8? supposed to apply to the BBC as well…..but i know anybody who doesn’t agree with this disgusting form of ‘socialism’ is an enemy of the state and needs to be dealt with…..Gorbachev the lot of them!….abducting and presumably killing a family member is certainly criminal and should be illegal with some fairly harsh penalties, surely?
        besides, have you seen the state of his wife? 😉

        and ‘no memory’….? well, that’s either perjury or indication of some sort of serious mental problem…she obviously need to be sectioned! or prosecuted for that as well….
        i can understand emotions run high over such things, but regardless she still chooses tolive with the guy if you believe whatever you read in the tabloids…..
        why am i even wasting my time talking to you about people i dnt even know and abt things that really is nobody else’s busines but their’s?

        and yes, public figure, and yes you do need to accept things the way they are…..but surely still entitled to ‘rights’? why should some members of the population be allowed to murder, rape, steal, break into homes and torture at will? whilst keeping their identities secret….? i have every right to walk down the street. i do not have the right to stop anybody else walking down the street. nobody has the right to stop anybody else walking down the street (or even into their own home, even if on fire) or interfere with anybody else and i swear if any of those motherfrackers even touch me again i will defend myself…..
        they have no respect because they treat people with such disrespect. you HAVE to be a psychopath in order to be a pigyob these days. it’s even in the job description, reading between the lines….
        rule by law? surely one rule for all or none at all, which is effectively what we got?

      • JM says:

        dammit, forgot abt the pointy brackets again…..

        after the winky smiley face i also wrote ‘yes, bit low i know but she abducted somebody’s cat and presumably murdered her/ him’

      • Robert Dooran says:

        Please could somebody translate Jake’s comments? I’m not fluent in simpleton.

      • Robert Dooran says:

        What does ‘slarring’ involve? It sounds awfully messy.

  25. Lets predict – yet another high profile WHITEWASH. Chris Huhne MP!!!

    Tomorrow Kier Starmer will personally or via the mouthy masonic pillock with form Yates of the yard – announce that “there isn’t enough evidence” to prosecute Huhne for “perverting the course of justice” – will there be the usual garbage, bilge and waffle of a whitewash – A LA:- Blair, Powell, Levy and Ruthy’s “loans for peerages” {Yates!!!! See Lloyd George (Zionist dupe]}, Ian Tomlinson’s murder [G20 protests] or Dr David Kelly ……

    Oops – You got that one a bit wrong, Steve!

  26. Steve H says:

    Thank you Mr notthinkingaloud – it was only a prediction nothing more nothing less.
    Here’s some good English:
    Fred the shred was stripped of his knighthood last week – so is it time to strip the Nobel Peace Prize from Al Gore – for the lies that he has promulgated about global warming? Remember the USA and China are the 2 biggest dissenters in the matter yet the whole issue came out of Al’s mouth – obviously via whoever was pulling his puppet strings. And of course in the UK its only about gathering taxes – and if it continues it will destroy the economy. Controlling economies is the mantra of some very dodgy businessmen / moneylenders ….. ponder the issues.

  27. Steve H says:

    Here’s some English – deemed good enough to be printed in the Bournemouth Echo on 21st December 2010 – and still standing as unrebutted and unrefuted.

    “Climate questions left unanswered
    Having attended the public meeting addressed by Chris Huhne (Energy and Climate Change Secretary) at Canford Heath Middle School last Friday, I and many other members of the public who do not agree with the Climate Change and Global Warming movement were prevented from putting what some would term “awkward” questions to the Minister. During his speech, Mr Huhne without referring to anything “specific” mentioned “statistics and science” that back up his views. He also made some brief comments about the recent Climate Change summit in Cancun (Mexico) but deftly moved past the subject of the Copenhagen summit (which seems to have become a sore subject). At the close of the meeting, Mr Huhne was given (accepted by him) a copy of Al Gore’s Nobel Peace Prize lecture and acceptance speech from 2007. (Booklet 60 pages entitled “Our Purpose”) Mr Huhne was asked to read it in light of evidence which has come to light over the past two years in respect of the data and science used originally that has since been discredited (never mind carbon credits). So much for free speech then.”

    Guess who the author was – does it matter or should you concentrate on the “content” of the letter?

  28. JM says:

    NDAA Nullification: Tennessee Bills Propose Kidnapping Charges for Federal Agents
    Bookmark and Share
    Posted by TAC Daily Updates

    EmailShare
    Share on Tumblr
    inShare

    State and local resistance to the detention provisions contained in the National Defense Authorization Act continues to grow, rapidly emerging as a nationwide movement.

    The Tennessee legislature will consider HB1629 and SB2669 in the 2012 session. The legislation would effectively nullify the detention provisions in the NDAA and would also require federal agents making an arrest in the Volunteer State for any reason to first obtain written permission from the county sheriff.

    This bill declares that any federal law purporting to require local or state law enforcement agencies to act at the direction of the federal government or the United States military is beyond the authority granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States Constitution, is not recognized by this state, is specifically rejected by this state and is declared to be invalid in this state. This bill further declares that any federal law purporting to give federal agents or employees, including any members of the United States military, the authority of any state or local law enforcement agency of this state, without the express permission of this state, is beyond the authority granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States Constitution, is not recognized by this state, is specifically rejected by this state, and is declared to be invalid in this state.

    The act takes aim at indefinite detention provisions in the NDAA. Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey called language in the NDAA vague and overbroad, pointing out that Americans should never simply trust in the good intentions and moral clarity of the president or federal judges to protect their rights.

    “It falls on the states to step in and protect their citizens,” he said. “I can’t imagine a more clear-cut application of state and local interposition as a check on federal power. What could be a more palpable, deliberate and dangerous unconstitutional act than the federal government indefinitely detaining an American citizen without due process?”

    The Tennessee bill also “makes it a Class E felony for any official, agent, or employee of the United States government to enforce or attempt to enforce any federal law, order, rule or regulation that is beyond the authority granted to the federal government pursuant to the United States Constitution,” and includes provisions for kidnapping charges if a federal agent were to detain a U.S. citizen in Tennessee under the NDAA.

    Rep. Bill Dunn (R-Knoxville) and Rep. Cameron Sexton (R-Crossville) sponsor the House version of the bill. Sen. Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville) sponsors the Senate bill.

    The Volunteer state joins Washington and Virginia considering legislation to nullify detention provisions in the NDAA. And local governments have also stepped up, including El Paso and Fremont Counties in Colorado. While some argue the NDAA doesn’t apply to American citizens, Maharrey said that notion should not stop state and local governments from following James Madison’s admonition to interpose and draw a line in the sand.

    “If what supporters say is true and the NDAA does not authorize indefinite detention of Americans, what is the harm in this legislation? Why would anybody oppose it? It does nothing but serve notice that state and local officials will not sit back and allow the federal government to exercise unconstitutional powers – powers supporters claim don’t exist anyway. It simply affirms a fence that supposedly already exists. The only rational I can find for opposing this bill is if they really do want the option of detaining Americans without due process to remain open,” he said. “You can only oppose this legislation if you accept the idea that the federal government has the authority to do whatever it wants with absolutely no check on its actions – Constitution be damned. If you ask me, that’s a lot scarier than whatever terrorist threat they claim to be protecting me from.”

    TAC executive Michael Boldin said he expects other states to soon follow the lead of Tennessee, Virginia and Washington.

    “We have pretty strong indications that Rhode Island, Utah, Maine, New Jersey, Oklahoma and other states will be introducing similar legislation soon. This is just a start – and activists all over the country need to contact state legislators right now to voice their support.”

    For model Liberty Preservation Act legislation you can propose to your state lawmakers, click HERE.

    To track state and local legislation across the U.S., click HERE.

    um, good news? not so sure….probably just propaganda….regardless,
    will never happen…but this is what i mean by checks and
    counterbalcnces….they’re removing all those….but Cornwall or
    Yorkshire dnt have their indepenent legislature so they can’t do
    that….maybe CLA is our best hope? Cornish Liberation Army…thought
    it was a joke first time I heard that….;-)

  29. JM says:

    anybody heard from Sabine lately? been a few days with no posts/ emails from her…..

  30. Seasoned Starfighter says:

    Sabine has decided that you are all too stupid to leave comments anymore. I hope you’re all proud of yourselves.

  31. Sabine has great integrity. I’m sure she wouldn’t do anything like that.

    • I have deleted comments that I consider not just negative but plain defamatory. First they were defaming Mr Ebert, then me. Who needs that? What for?

      I shall even blacklist the guy unless he does deliver what I asked him for: evidence for what he claims to know and have.

  32. Where has my comment gone? I demand an explanation!

  33. Are Ebert and Oaks really the same person? Seems unlikely.

  34. Sabine – I understand why you need to remove certain comments from these boards, but it is a shame. Some of your regular contributors are complete nut-jobs and a constant source of amusement.

  35. JM says:

    who are these ‘nut jobs’ though…..? it’s abusive comments like that that is kinda the point…..

  36. Absolutely not JM. I don’t have to point out the comedians on this site – they are ridiculously easy to spot.

  37. Anonymous says:

    Sabine
    I am happy ready and willing to show you incriminating evidence against Mr. Ebert otherwise known here as Peter Oakes.

    I have the following conditions
    1. My name and details remain confidential and not shown at any point to Ebert.
    2. Once I show you the evidence both written and direct you in the right directions and you conclude what will be obvious in that Ebert has conned you , that you will make it known on this site and not allow Ebert any access to this site .

    If I am going to waste time on this I need to know that you are not one sided and will be happy to see and digest evidence against Ebert.

    The evidence will include
    1. His suspicion for fraud in Israel
    2. Details of his debts and creditors in Germany including selling merchandise he bought wholesale cheaper then wholesale price because he had no intention of ever paying wholesaler.
    3. Details of him defrauding his partner in Liverpool and fabricating expenses.
    4. Details of fabricated repair invoices produced to landlords in so called expenses and repairs.
    5. statements from builders against invoices who confirm that they either never carried out the work or inflated the invoices as requested by Mr. Ebert in order to give Ebert a kick back. This was to hide from his partner the true cost of expenses.
    6. Copy of Liverpool city council letter confirming that Ebert defrauded in rents.
    7. Contacts in the business community and in Jewish community who will back up with stories about Ebert and different type of fraud he has committed. He owes considerable amount of people considerable money.

    There are many more issues to list but I would be going on forever as the eloits of this man go far and beyond.I believe my offer is reasonable and I look forward to hear from you.

    • Dear Anonymous,

      Having taken legal advice, I have the following questions:

      1. Why do you insist on remaining anonymous?

      2. Why do you contact me and why at this time, specifically, given that I published information about Mr Ebert for quite some time?

      3. Why have you not taken this prima facie evidence to the CPS?

      4. I suggest the you do so and come back to me with the crime reference number. For I don’t see why I should spend time with you. The CPS are paid to investigate crimes. I am not.

  38. JM says:

    you trust the poolice and CPS? thought you knew better than that…? besides the only way to get a name out of one is to kill one, what makes u think they’re gonna give you the crime referencwe number? stil refuses to give me any of the several hundred/ near a thousand numbers to me…….

    • Robert Dooran says:

      ‘the only way to get a name out of one is to kill one’

      What a responsible comment.

      I thought you might like this.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/relationships/relationship-advice-and-romance/9082074/John-Hemming-Are-you-saying-that-Im-a-sex-god.html

      • JM says:

        statement of fact…..certainly was not non physical entity a, b or some bloke called Roy, not his real name that raped or torture me……i’ve had ten years of this shit and i can’t vn confirm if any of them are actual pigyobs!

        & what would make you think i wd be interested in that?

      • JM says:

        hey…i have a massive intellect an still my own hair….so why aren’t i attractive to women?

      • Robert Dooran says:

        You might have more success with women if you stopped using the word rape when what you actually mean is having your picture taken.

        • JM says:

          actually did read that article cheerz…..and did confirm Beauty never turned up…i wonder if that part was in anyway due to my posting….? 😉

          why you so obsessed with Hemming anyway? you stalking him or soemthing?

          and you know nothing about it pal so why not keep your smart arse comments to yorself?

      • Robert Dooran says:

        I’m not obsessed with John Hemming. I merely find it funny that he’s held up as some sort of paragon of virtue on these pages when he displays all the morals of an alley cat.

        Both Mrs. Hemming and his mistress leave comments regarding the disappearance of Beauty in the below Guardian piece.

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/02/cat-theft-paris-fashion-immigration

        • JM says:

          funny? perhaps you can explain what you find so funny about it?

          and wher do your ‘morals’ (as you call them) stand on the crusades? the old one’ss and the recent one’s…..?
          i doubt you really know anything aabout it, the gutter press doesn’t actually count as ‘knowing’ anything….
          i didn’t see any comments from the Mrs….but one from Emily Cox (sounds like a pornstar)….who says it wasn’t even her cat/ notBeauty…? so WTF?

          so what happened to Beauty, as well as the doppelganger?

          it’s not nice to be ‘cheated on’, i have been but never done it….so i can sympathise that far….and yes you could argue that ‘marriage’ does mean exclusivty…! but it’s notreally considered a ‘life contract’ no matter what these days is it? didn’t Henry VIII change that…? long time ago…..but rgadless, it’s between them and nobody else’s business, s far as i can see and i have a big moral problem with people like to ‘dictate’ to people based on their own ‘morals’, invariably poxy morons!

          the problem i have with John is selective censoring of my comments on his blog….puts the rest out of context! saame with twatting people around the head with baseball bats or stabbing them…..context is everything!

      • Robert Dooran says:

        The comments from Mrs. Hemming and Emily Cox were below the line:

        ‘I am unable to give all the answers to your questions until after the sentencing.
        I can assure you however, that the cat was returned within 24 hours to near the property, and then again was refound in the area within 4 weeks. I delivered posters as soon as I was aware the cat was still missing and looked with infrared glasses in garages and gardens.
        The stray cat was alerted to John. Emily stated the cat was not hers because a chest bone was different. John initally did not agree. The markings were identical. I delivered posters as soon as I was aware the cat was still missing. I asked for the cat to be taken into police care as recovered missing property and I considered paying for dna testing and comparing this to its brother. I was informed by the police that you can not affect a decision of an owner that a cat is not theirs.
        No cats have been found injured or dead in the area or matching the description of the missing cat.
        There will always be people who do not believe me I know. I am not jealous of Emily because leopards do not change their spots.’
        Chris Hemming

        ‘Two points for the sake of clarity:
        1. The cat was not ours. The colouring was wrong and Beauty has a protruding breast bone which this cat did not.
        2 Mrs. Hemming put up posters in the B11 area of Birmingham. . I live in the B13 area of Birmingham. She and I clearly differ over what constitutes nearby.’
        Emily Cox

        ‘saame with twatting people around the head with baseball bats or stabbing them’

        I can’t imagine why he’d want to moderate your insightful and well reasoned comments.

      • JM says:

        could see no comment from Mrs…..looks like it been deleted, certainly nothing under that name…..do you think she had aa wwrrant to o searching folk’s gardenss and garaes with special glasses? or does she think she’s exempt drom the law just because she’s married to an MP, like they are?
        and chest bone…? i’m no experton cats, but expect like any other animal..bones tend to move, especially if been chucked over a wall….but like people though, y’know who they are- even without seing, if you’re that familia with a person….

        and as for JH….i think he does what he can, to a point….but at the end of the day he’s still one of them….the only reason i think he’s slightly more worthy than most is that he successful businessman to….being an MPis a thankless job….and despite the free booze, exemption from the law, perks, orgies and that…..there still no valid reason for him to be doing that ‘job’ as far as i can see….unless he genuinely cares about the causes he’ss involved in…..

        that always sued to be my general plan, probably not an MP….but i used to be reasonably ssuccessful businessman before the targetting…..and my general plan was always to a) build a family/ life, b) get fininciaally secure/ good rock, then c) start giving soemthing back properly….as i say not an MP (i’m too shy 😉 ) and value my privacy, but soemthing….
        not to mention he chose LD as his party…….(i tried to join but they wdn’t have me)—- not a gr8 business decison at the time, if u wanted power your only ption was to hoose blue or red…..so principle deccision, and just waited for the wheel to turn….never wd have happeed in his or my lifetime—until they ralised the token black guy thing wasn’t going to work over here and they did that instead…sigh….so predictable!

        trouble is this issn’t England anymore….

      • JM says:

        and he did stop censoring pigyob fer a while….maybe he’s sstarting to wake up a bit…you dnt really know until you o receiving end of it though!

  39. Steve H says:

    Bitter pills are hard to swallow …. being a statistician – you could hardly begin to understand human deception – Computers do not have the ability of human deception and you just dont get it; ‘cos you know sweet fa about human deception. In your world 2 + 2 must always equal 4 – try the legal world for starters Sabine ‘you self-proclaimed’ – and admitted “Learner”.

  40. Anonymous says:

    Sabine

    So you trust legal advice ? Who have you taken advise from? I have only now come across your web site by chance. If I would have seen it a year ago or before you would have heard sooner.
    All the evidence is with the authorities and hence why I have told you Mr. Ebert is a con. Ebert has shown you selective documents to establish his case.
    You don’t want to meet and see the evidence that is up to you. I guess you want to continue to allow Ebert to distribute his lies.

  41. Steve H says:

    I dare say – and will say that Mr anonymous here, has got a point. I do now in timelocked and historical fashion “challenge” – not Sabine; but “her” “legal advisers” to come out ‘transaprently, and openly’ [put up – or be guilty by your silence] from behind the shadows of their “opinions” [I have told all readers here ad infinitum about the differences between ‘facts and opinions’ – many thickos still don’t get it]

    Let’s be having an “open PUBLIC debate” ….. why be corralled by useless, spineless, careerist [self-centred GRAVY-TRAIN SNAKES – wishing to become Ministers!] suborned greedy MP’s? We don’t need to be deceptively coralled like sheep and we won’t be for much longer.

  42. Steve H says:

    One has to beg the question of your legal advisers Sabine. perhaps they were a bit frugal with the actuality in law – or perhaps they themselves are not fully informed of the true laws – just my opinion mind.

  43. Steve H says:

    Oh Gawd – there’s something in the Daily Mail today at page 14! Is Melanie Phillips trying to reCASTE herself – she’s “finally” thrown some dirt at Stalinism and Communism ….. just read the last 12 or 13 paragraphs of her article. N.B. She’s a commentator ….. an opinion former – but I have copies of all of her espousings for the past x years – or has she ‘finally’ seen some light?

  44. Anonymous says:

    We have not had any update to the criminal court hearing of Ebert.

  45. JM says:

    I’m not looking for entertainment, but an update wd be nice though….’fraid no good on the phone….and i can’t with my situation, not ‘my’ phone….

  46. I’m extremely inspired along with your writing skills and also with the layout to your blog. Is this a paid topic or did you customize it yourself? Anyway stay up the nice high quality writing, it is uncommon to peer a great weblog like this one these days..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s