FAIR and JUST? On the Rule of Law and the Quality of its Enforcement

The law is only as good
Victims Unite has brought a few starfighters together who have studied the law, helped as McKenzie Friends and challenged antiquated rules such as the ban on recording court proceedings.

Here is the online petition Abolish the Ban on Recording Court Proceedings and here is a first collection of comments by signers.

Here are a few conclusions by victims who stand up for themselves:

UK Police Personnel should have Criminal Records Bureau Checks – an online petition that publishes a list of charged or convicted Prison, Police and Court Personnel (ca 1274)

The Law is only as good as the integrity of those entrusted to administrate it. — Maurice Kirk

A law breaker cannot also be a law enforcer. — Caul Grant

‘The Law’ in Britain (The Police & the Courts), deliberately deny me the protection of the law, & deliberately block me from seeking a remedy in the courts for crimes & other wrongs committed against me. That being so, & it IS fact, then that same ‘Law’ CANNOT be used to punish me. Indeed, both Police & Courts have themselves committed serious crimes against me, & do so with impunity.

Or in short:

  • LAW ONE is to Protect the Powerful.
  • LAW TWO is to Oppress those who are Not.
  • LAW THREE is to destroy anyone who dares to protest. — Norman Scarth

Caul also points out:

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law.

No person may be punished for an act that was not a criminal offence at the time of its commission.


About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Corruption, Human Rights Convention, McKenzie Friends, Universal Declaration of Human Rights and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to FAIR and JUST? On the Rule of Law and the Quality of its Enforcement

  1. peter oakes says:

    Absolutely correct Norman. Now how do we go about changing it ?
    without GM. or others saying get a gun. violence. revolution etc.

    There is a way and I await more clever people than myself to explain it.

    Lets see the responce

  2. Pingback: FAIR and JUST? On the Rule of Law and the Quality of its Enforcement |

  3. mymouths2big says:

    As I see it, the only way forward is to insist, in each and every court case, our lawful right of trial by a jury of our peers. Remember, “That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.” Bill of Rights. Therefore, every communication we receive, verbal or written, stating we will be fined, unless we jump through one of the government’s legislative hoops,is criminal extortion, and so voids the offence.

    The mistake we make is assuming that the, Judge, in the silly wig, is our judge, when in fact they are nothing of the kind; our judges are the jury, they are there to defend us against, the abuse of law by Government and their wig wearing employees, the Judges. They of course claim they are fully independent of Government, which as they are cosseted, and provided with gold-plated-pension schemes, is rather like a bullet claiming it has no relationship to the gun.
    The maxim that no one should be judge in his own cause, raises the question of why Judges are allowed to be just that, when they imprison people like Norman Scarth, and Maurice Kirk, for contempt.
    It is important to recognise the extraordinary powers possessed by each and every member of the jury, who outrank the appointed Court Judge. They can nullify bad law by refusing to convict, acquit a defendant they believe acted reasonably under the circumstances, even if the law has been broken.. Statutes can never be sovereign to common sense.
    The way forward is to start querying each official letter warning that non-compliance will result in a fine, the fine has been made void by the threat. By threatening to summon them before a jury, for issuing us illegal threats,
    (No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled . nor will we proceed with force against him . except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice. Magna carta) We should do the same with instant fines, reject them lawfully, they are banned.
    By insisting that our lawful rights are reinstated, we can cause ripples, which will become waves and swamp them.

  4. Pingback: Abolish the Ban on Recording Court Proceedings – comments indicate major discontent « Victims Unite!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s