THE POLICE STATE uses a Private Call Centre for Hiding Behind

13 03 03 FraudVICTIMS of white collar crimes, UNITE! [Sorry about the negative news after the positive one before.]

Fraud is a nice short word for ‘white collar crime’. Blue collar workers commit more physical crimes. No wonder that the Police feels incapable. They are more the physical type, aren’t they: “It’s above our heads.”

But they can go into all the sophistication necessary to detect computer crimes and can hire accountants and anybody smart enough to investigate accounts, paper work and computer trails, when it is in … whose interest???

So what’s the real reason for the Police passing its responsibilities relating to fraud over to a call centre – as the Daily Mail writes in Fraud victims swindled out of thousands of pounds told to forget police and contact a call centre?

  1. Is the crime ‘worth investigating’? (My credit card theft of £200 was NOT!)
  2. “Action Fraud” will just be a data entry team and statistics compiler. NO action in other words.

The Government can’t really do much except set up new institutions and organisations or rename Governmental departments and shuffle jobs, titles and people.

  • It uses money to pay people to ‘do their job’.
  • Or it sets up private companies and becomes a client for them.
  • As ‘money’ has become an economic weapon and tool for control rather than a medium of exchange, another ‘fob off organisation’ needs to be created to protect the Government and the City of London; it’s obvious to those who stopped believing what the mainstream media are telling them…


  • Ismail describes it excellently as ‘Silent Fraud‘ in his comment to the previous post – since the institutions responsible for ‘implementing the law’ fail to do their job in the courts and especially the family courts.

However, one civil servant whose job it is to protect the Prime Minister from the electorate has done something that appears to be ‘nice’ at face value: turn Maggie’s letter to the PM into this e-petition:

It pinpoints the Office of the Leader of the House of Commons as being responsible! Does he have budget for implementing what the electorate wishes??? Just another fob-off exercise to keep the electorate busy rather than make things happen!?…

Let’s look at petitions:

  • AVAAZ is the most popular and seemingly the most effective one – until I read on a German blog who funds them… Still, they do reflect the opinions of over 19 million people so far. And anybody interested in controlling the world would want to control the opposition!…
  • the Government’s e-petition site has the advantage of promising a Parliamentary debate, if more than 100,000 signatures are reached; the disadvantage is that signers get onto their ‘register of opposition’ directly; in fact, you need to put your address down; in any case, it is an excellent indicator to HMG for what the electorate doesn’t like; but who cares?
  • I have been using GoPetition for publishing online petitions and collating comments since 2008; more user-friendly sites have sprung up and Facebook allows for registering ’causes’
  • well, I shall continue to refer people in those institutions where they can make a difference to petitions and their comments, hoping that their conscience might click into gear, while they are ‘just doing their job’…
  • knowing what’s dishonest with our money system we’re watching 1984 (published in 1949!) and Police State UK
  • no wonder the Network for Police Monitoring has started the campaign don’t be on a database; they even maintain a short list of solicitors who take on the Police.



  • How the legal profession protects the financial profession: I was told by a solicitor that most of them have banks as their clients… by law more or less!


  • How the Police has become more and more corrupt follows Hollywood – the ultimate policy maker, it seems – which I noticed especially since I saw Anglo-Saxon capitalism roll into former East Germany – but with a vengeance – resulting in so much more and violent crime than before 1989… 😦 
  • Anarchy is meant to get worse: the Rule of Money has replaced the Rule of Law – and surveillance cameras replace morals, ethics, decency and integrity…



About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is
This entry was posted in Daily Mail, Government, Mainstream Media and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to THE POLICE STATE uses a Private Call Centre for Hiding Behind

  1. Jean McDonald says:

    Thank you for your latest email. Do you know of an honest ‘policeman’? Or are they controlled by the ‘system’ and people at the top? Jean Sent from my iPhone

    • Yes, Tony Farrell who blew the whistle on 7/7 used to work for South Yorkshire Police. He says he has friends who are waiting for him to do something…

      • I reported a fraud and provided clear and convincing evidence for the Police. This evidence so clear that after applying the NCRS and HOCR recorded Perverting the Course of Justice against a named offender. The ACPO rules stated offenses where their is a named offender will always be investigated. This was the tip of the iceberg the amount involved is in excess of £10,000 Police refused to investigate as a civil and not a criminal offense. The offense is a serious indictable only offense under common law.

        The trust of loyalty to friends is the forlorn hope now no longer a copper he has been betrayed. John Stalker wrote of a living nightmare after being asked by one of his comrades RUC Chief Constable John Hermon to investigate the killings, following a public outcry after a police constable had been charged and found not guilty after admitting in court that he had been instructed to lie on oath.

        There has been scandal after scandal, the guardian published; It is hard to think of a case of alleged police misconduct which has not been surrounded by police misstatements. Harwood’s claims are the latest of the untrue stories issued by the Met about the events surrounding Tomlinson’s death. They claimed, for example, that officers tried to resuscitate him and called an ambulance while a screaming mob pelted them with bottles. In reality, demonstrators helped him and called an ambulance, and there was no hail of bottles.
        Justice is impossible if we cannot trust police forces to tell the truth | George Monbiot via @guardian






    Arthur J S Hall Versus Simmons & Others.

    This Judgment has now been removed from the Bailii Web Site.

    There is a Judgment given in the House of Lords on the 20th July 2000 which is in the Public Domain Document.

    Weightmans LLP of Liverpool-

    Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (A Firm)

    and The Bar Council did intervene in the House of Lords,

    Whilst Weightmans LLP are also advising the Metropolitan Police, since the Former Home Secretary Jack Straw MP, He had made a Statement that some Solicitors does not admit the Facts, as they want to milk their clients and earn more amount of money

    Jack Straw MP He did not mention of the words Silent Fraud at the time.

    Several Reports had been made to the Metropolitan Police in London Area,

    Whilst there are other Metropolitan Police Officers in Manchester who have carried out their Statutory Duty, but other Officers have merely acted in such a way as there is SILENT FRAUD-

    Many Persons will not have reasonable access to Justice, whilst reasonable force is used to have the Offenders or Suspected Offenders brought to Justice before a Jury Trial,
    as The High Court Judge has Jurisdiction Power to deal with any Statute of Law or Custom,

    The Criminal Procedure Rules 2012 Part 7, This needs to be amended that Criminal Proceedings can be commenced before any High Court Judge, Any Crown Court where there is a sentence of more than 2 Years Imprisonment.

    Yours Faithfully

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

  3. JM says:

    you can’t expect them to foil their own plan…..namely to get everybody chipped….they have to allow these crimes to keep escalating to the point their only ‘solution’ is to start chipping everybody…..

    anyway, it’s still illegal for them to give out your personal details to private companies without your knowledge or consent last i heard…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s