OUT OF HOLLOWAY: at what cost? With what damages and what irreparable traumas?

Melissa Laird is the US mother who was deported on 12 September whilst her child is kept for adoption. She received her Deportation Order made on 29 November 2012 on 12 December 2012 in Holloway prison. This delay in post going in and out seems to be standard for prisoners who try to defend themselves and act as Litigants in Person.

In fact, it is utterly amazing, if anybody succeeds with any litigation whilst ‘inside’. I have not only seen this first hand with Melissa but also with Maurice Kirk, the flying vet who has been exceptionally bullied and harassed and extremely damaged by South Wales Police and the Director of Caswell Clinic.

Melissa was dumped in Dulles Airport Washington – without ‘reception and rehabilitation’ as would have been required by law. But the Rule of Money has long replaced the Rule of Law in the family courts, it seems.

Her son has not seen his mum since 13 December 2011, when he was 4 years old. For anybody to claim it’s in the child’s best interest, is farcical, to put it mildly. No proper assessment of the child’s best interest has taken place anyhow. But it’s much more fun for Social Workers to travel to Spain to gather ‘evidence’ and justify their child snatching by presenting a ‘paper reality’ to judges who sanction ‘on paper’ whatever separates children from their parents and grandparents – for the sake of sex, money or both…

How to stop cover up is the real issue addressed by John Hemming MP on Channel IV news:

Related articles

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Child 'care', Child 'Protection', Child abduction, Family Courts, John Hemming MP, McKenzie Friends, Prison, Rule of Law, Rule of Money and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to OUT OF HOLLOWAY: at what cost? With what damages and what irreparable traumas?

  1. Pingback: #50randomthingsaboutme – after Melissa Laird’s Deportation and Yoga as my Recovery | Sabine K McNeill

  2. Pingback: US MOTHER to be deported from the U.K. whilst her child is kept for adoption | Anti Oligarch

  3. Pingback: DEPORTED, imprisoned and beaten for being a Parent: Sunday Telegraph | Melissa Laird

  4. The more I read about British Justice, the more I am reminded of Brer Rabbit and the Tarbaby; for the more one reads, the more impossible it becomes to break free from the mire of murk and corruption that BJ now presents.

  5. Tony Butler says:

    Family Courts remain unlawful. No Judge, politician, or Monarch has the authority to deny anyone justice, according to Magna carta and the Bill of Rights.

    Anyone claiming such authority is a liar, and common criminal engaged in unlawfully abrogating our statutory freedoms and liberties.

    Churchill wrote:
    “Here is a law which is above the King and Parliament, and which even He and They must not and may not legally break. And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation shall have no force nor effect and can be safely ignored with no legal ill effect. In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those (saving the King, Queen and the royal children) who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favour of any such successful attempts at abrogation. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it.”

    All Family Court judges and the Social Services, are actively engaged in the abrogation of the law by denying these women and their families a right to justice. All their judgments and gagging orders are therefore void and can be ignored without fear of legal reprisals.

    What jury would accept the authority of the Social Services and Family Court Judge, over that of the Churchill and the Royal Command, our former KIng?

  6. Renata Ostertag says:

    That was done to me as well. My son was kept in extended “care” when I was deported from UK to Canada (!) several years ago! Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:08:46 +0000 To: renata_ostertag@hotmail.com

  7. Pingback: LAW BREAKERS can’t be Law Enforcers: the First Empowerment Monday | Victims Unite!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s