THREE POSITIVE Judgements by Sir James Munby and 4,000 Financial Ombudsmen (and -women)

13 10 25 Jail Social WorkersIt is too soon to sing Hallelujah, but here are two stories in one week that make our hearts sing and our hands applaud Sir James Munby:

  1. Jail social workers who take children without telling parents why, says Britain’s top family judge
    * Sir James Munby attacked workers in Bristol who didn’t explain themselves
    * They did not tell a couple why their two children were being taken from them
    * They breach a court order in doing so – which could carry a jail term in future
  2. MP [John Hemming of course] condemns secret justice
    * Strange that no other paper has reported this yet…
  3. Courts should adapt to the realities of the internet, particularly social media
    * I just wish that this judgement was taken on board by every judge in the country!

On the other end of the spectrum of white collar crimes, I met last night two of the 4,000 Financial Ombudsmen who have been set up by the financial industry as alternatives to court – and they are free of charge! Once you’re in court, they don’t help, it seems. Also, when cases are too big, i.e. worth more than £100,000. Well, they do have to protect themselves, don’t they, these brethren. A seasoned fighter tells me about the ‘conflicts of interest’ of senior board members…

Apparently, they grew exponentially over the last two years AND they get financial institutions to pay compensation! They also uphold far more complaints than they refuse. So give them a chance, I’d say!

Wouldn’t it be nice if there were as many Legal Ombudsmen (and -women) around – free of charge – instead of lawyers riding the Legal Aid train???

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Child 'care', Child 'Protection', Family Courts, John Hemming MP, Rule of Law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to THREE POSITIVE Judgements by Sir James Munby and 4,000 Financial Ombudsmen (and -women)

  1. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    RE:- FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICES LTD they are not independent and Impartial Authority under Article 6 of the Convention Treaties as there is no fair hearing under Article 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 17 and Protection of Property Protocol:-
    _____________________________________________________________

    The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 has been mentioned under the FSMA 2000, but they have not transferred to the Officers dealing under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

    The Financial Services Authority should be dealing with all the complaints as this will reduce time.

    Litigants in Person under the Litigants Act 1975 are not awarded the Costs for the time they have spent in making their complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Services, The Local Government Ombudsman Commissioner, The Parliamentary Ombudsman Commissioner

    The Letter from the Parliamentary Ombudsman Commissioner sent to the Member of Parliament Scott Lee MP that we didn’t provide sufficient evidence was knowingly making false statements

    Section 1 of the Zambia Independence Act 1964 is a Parliament Act which is in the Public Domain- There has been Harassment, Discrimination, victimisation and Intimidation for a considerable number of Years.

    Barclays Bank PLC they do have a Branch operating in the Republic of Zambia, but they have been concealing and suppressing evidence.

    Yours Faithfully

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

  2. falcon entertainmentsuk says:

    pleas pease please stop and stop now what are you doing trying to get victims a ban name the F.O.S is one of the things that abour rgw banks and others in the uk which are not fit for porpose and any one who as any thing to do with them must 1. are being paid by the banks or 2 not right in the head so which are you ? the F.O.S have and will always back the banks as in my own case with the banks so like lesley newton and clare mortimer have in fact had hoildays paid for them and tther family by the bank of scotland and we can show that fact. they have always backed the banks so what are you thinking of?

  3. If a judge has decreed that a child can remain in the mothers care during proceedings, can a guardian and social worker convene a meeting and order a mother out of the house and render her homeless. There was no court order from a judge, which stated that mother and child should not be in the same house and live apart. Contact had been sanctioned by the early intervention team, it was the long term team became involved that this occured.

    • What they CAN do is one thing, what they SHOULD do, another..

      Our challenge is to get them to perform according to the Rule of Law and – at least – NOT to ignore court orders and their own guidance for practice.

  4. This is exactly what they have done, ignored their own guidance and practise.

  5. Reblogged this on legallyblondepaddy and commented:
    Sir James muah

  6. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    ZAMBIA CELEBRATED 49TH INDEPENDENCE CELEBRATIONS FROM HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM ON THE 24TH OCTOBER 1964 BY AN ORDER IN COUNCIL

    MY BROTHER THE LATE ABRAHAM ABDULHAI BHAMJEE HE WAS A SOLDIER IN THE ZAMBIAN ARMY, WHILST HE HAD DIED WHEN HE WAS IN THE ZAMBIAN ARMED FORCES AS HE HAD TAKEN THE OATH OF ALLEGANCE TO DEFEND THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA.

    THE BRITISH LAWYERS-BARRISTERS WHO ARE REGISTERED ON THE ELECTORAL ROLL IN ANY PART OF THIS WORLD, THEY DON’T HAVE THE MANDATE TO VOTE IN ANY TYPE OF ELECTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA.

    SINCE THE BRITISH TRADERS WHEN THERE WAS BRITISH RULE IN MANY PARTS OF THIS WORLD, THEY HAD MADE ARTIFICIALLY BOUNDARIES AND DIVIDED THE PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO HAVE A TRADE MONOPOLY.

    THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD, AND THE VISITORS INNS WHO ARE OR HAVE THE MONOPOLY OVER BARRISTERS, THIS SHOULD BE ABOLISHED

    THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE OFFICE FOR FAIR TRADING SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ISSUING OF LICENSES TO ANY PERSON TO DEAL WITH THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT LITIGATION BEFORE ANY COURT OF LAW OR TRIBUNAL IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.

    THIS IS GOING TO REDUCE INJUSTICE AND MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AS THE BAR STANDARDS BOARD THEY DON’T PRACTICE WHAT THEY PREACH.

    YOURS FAITHFULLY

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

  7. Pingback: LEGAL AID lawyer, secret courts and social workers collude(d) to adopt (two) boys | Punishment without Crime

  8. Pingback: THE GOVERNMENT wants to see families being supported to stay together | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  9. Pingback: BELINDA’s Battle for Britain’s Children: today at Courts 43 and 46 in the Strand | Punishment without Crime - Bereavement without Death

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s