@UKHomeOffice @cpsUK @MetPoliceUK Shocking truth about #PoliceCorruption in Britain – It’s a growing problem; hunting #whistleblowers instead

16 04 03 SpectatorThe article with the above headline appeared already on 07 March 2015 in The Speactator.

Since I’ve become a victim as ‘public interest whistleblower’, it was sent to me and became obviously even more meaningful.

This is how the article starts:

Imagine you lived in a country which last year had 3,000 allegations of police corruption. Worse, imagine that of these 3,000 allegations only half of them were properly investigated — because for police officers in this country, corruption was becoming routine. Imagine that the police increasingly used their powers to crack down not on criminals but on anyone who dared speak out against them. What sort of a country is this? Well, it’s Britain I’m afraid — where what was once the finest, most honest service in the world is in danger of becoming rotten.

The article relies on two reports:

  1. HM Inspectorate of Constabulary published that 17,200 staff surveyed said that if they discovered corruption among their colleagues, they would fear ‘adverse consequences’;
  2. the Serious Organised Crime Agency says there has been a sharp increase in the number of police officers dealing with drugs and an equally startling rise in the number of officers abusing their power ‘for sexual gratification’.

The rise in corruption and the apparent reluctance of police chiefs to fight it is a toxic combination. As ever, chief constables blame lack of resources for not being able to pursue inquiries into claims of malpractice. But what could be a greater priority than ensuring that their own officers are not breaking the law? These same police chiefs seem to find endless funds to pursue ancient sex abuse allegations, chase people who say unpleasant things on Twitter and prosecute journalists.

Even more shockingly, the article refers to The Times publishing a story 45 years earlier with the pattern we are experiencing today. The Royal Commission into New South Wales Police confirmed the UK’s pattern in 1997: corruption, paedophilia and satanic ritual abuse.

What’s different in the Hampstead Scandal in 2015 while I’m learning about fifty shades of whistleblowing?

  1. the hunting of journalists is replaced by the hounding of bloggers, while mainstream media are part of the cover-ups;
  2. the investigation into truth is led by a voluntary internet community
  3. corruption by Police is ‘legitimised’ by corruption in local and High Courts:
    • Barnet judge Vera Mayer passed jurisdiction after four local hearings;
  4. Mrs Justice Pauffley labelled the internet community “evil and / or foolish”;
    • her judgment has been disputed vigorously online; she acknowledged Police concealing evidence in paragraphs 107 and 108, but did not change jurisdiction from her secret family court to an open criminal court;
    • declaring the father ‘innocent’ doesn’t stop him and his allies from libel, slander and defaming everybody who supports the children’s allegations;
  5. the evidence that cults like his exist is overwhelming; why did the High Court judge deny it?
  6. the ‘whistleblowers’ are a then 8-year-old boy and a 9-year-old girl as witnesses of more than sixty other child victims and an untold number of babies who were consistent in their stories, independent of each other and together, talking with different adults;
    • the mother compiled a document with the names of 20 Police Officers from 16 Police Stations which she handed to Barnet Police who closed the case with “crime not confirmed”;
    • linking “Hampstead Children” to an album of their video testimonials caused the second of my four arrests as ‘malicious communication’, as some of the abusers are mentioned on some of the videos;
  7. three ‘activists’ are being prosecuted:

I had fled the UK after receiving the threat of prosecution which was compounded by the threat of imprisonment by a secret family court.

My nephew is a lawyer and tells me that in Germany the offended party would use the equivalent of  a ‘Cease and Desist’ notice. My publication might violate Freedom to Publish laws, but would never be a CRIMINAL offence. Also, in Germany, the system doesn’t bother with sentences of less than six months. Anything less would be community service or alike. I risk nine weeks prison, which I could ‘bargain down’, if I pleaded ‘guilty’ asap. What kind of ‘truth finding’ leading to ‘justice’ is that???

The “people processing industry” is flourishing in the UK and contributing to the GDP in the most heinous, inhuman and disgusting ways.

However, victims turned starfighters have long discovered the omission of articles 1 and 13 in the Human Rights Act and Royal Charters as tickets to immunity from prosecution…

Mind the gap between illusions and reality!



About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Abuse Survivors, Online Activism, Police, Police state, Public Interest, Russian Children, Satanic Ritual Abuse, UK Court System, UK Family Courts, Whistleblowers and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to @UKHomeOffice @cpsUK @MetPoliceUK Shocking truth about #PoliceCorruption in Britain – It’s a growing problem; hunting #whistleblowers instead

  1. T Birks says:

    Police corruption isn’t new but in the past it was mostly reserved for those who could afford it.

  2. Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee says:

    (5) Civil Restraint Orders CPR 3-11
    (6) CPR 54-12 (6) The Court may give directions requiring the Proceedings to be heard by a Divisional Court.
    (7) Lazarous Estates Ltd Versus Beasley PLC [1956) 1 QB 702 Fraud and Misrepresentation.
    (8) Section 55 (1) (d) (3) 58, 59 (1) (2) of the Family Law Act 1986 and Statutory Instrument 1988 No 226 Rules 109 and 111 (4) to (10)
    (9) Section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981.
    (10) Section 73A of TCPA 1990 (as inserted by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991.
    (11) The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982.
    (12) Section 26 (1) of the Crime and Courts Act 2013.
    (13) The Contracts (Applicable Law) Act 1990.

    Please kindly take the above into consideration, since there is Mal-Administration in the Attorney General Chambers Law Officers- and the Lord Chancellor’s SS Ministry of Justice.

    The Lord Chancellors SS Ministry of Justice does delay in issuing Statutory Instruments to bring other Legislation into force where other Citizens are being denied justice, and others are being sent to prison, whilst their assetts and Belongings Goods for Trade and Work have been ceased unlawfully, as there is an Offence under Section 38 of the Public Order Act 1986.

    The Contracts (Applicable Law) Act 1990, and the European Communities Act 1972 is a Parliament Act which had been enacted when the Conservative Party were in Power, this Acts have been ignored by other members of the Conservative Party, whilst no disciplinary Action is taken at the Local Party Level and to the Top Level.


    Some Court Officers and High Court Judges are being abusive of their Powers whilst there are ignoring other Parliaments Acts and Statutory Instruments.

    The Common Law Powers, Since Section 49 (2) (b) (3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981- The Meaning of the Words: EQUALITY SHALL PREVAIL
    We have Equal Rights under the Statute Law, but this Power has been removed by the Judges and Former Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer who had issued the Statutory Instrument to bring the CPR 3-11 rules into force, when the Judges in the Court of Appeal on the 9th July 2003 didn’t consider the Family Law Act 1986 Part 3 Declaration of Marital Status and the Decision of Dunoon Developments Ltd Versus the Secretary of State and Poole District Council.
    Citizens should petition that the CPR 3-11 should be repealed, and Permission of the Court to bring Contempt of Court Proceedings under the CPR Part 81 should be taken against the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Ltd and the Barrister and Solicitor.

    The Metropolitan Police will not record a crime when a crime has been reported to them, whilst there is no fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention Treaties when a complaint is made to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

    One of the High Court Judge in the Family Division High Court of Justice who was at the Time Mr Justice Ew-Bank on the 28th April 1988, He had stated that It was only the HM Attorney General who could authorise an Application to Stop a Person from making any Applications without leave of the High Court. The Barrister did mislead the High Court by failing to inform the High Court of New Legislation of the Family Law Act 1986, whilst the Police didn’t take any Criminal Proceedings against the Barrister and Solicitor.

    Application that the Claim form be heard under Section 66 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, This isn’t an Abuse of the Process of the Court or being Vexatious Application, as the New CPR 54-12 (6) applies.

    Yours Faithfully

    Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

  3. truth1 says:

    The law, the media, enforcement, courts, and dare I say, the average citizen, have all done justice great harm. We have let down children who are completely vulnerable to whatever we do for them or against them and most of the UK has let them down, to say nothing of other nations who have had similar such as the USA, pop. 330 million, vs a mere pop.66 million in the UK.

    there is a duty that every human being has to every other member of their species. A duty to respect other peoples feeling as much as our own and give each their due accord. And all the more so for those of young tender ages who can not possible defend themselves or have any effect on their own fate and destiny. We have disgraced ourselves if we simply ignore this case and others like it and proceed as if nothing happened and nothing is wrong.

    Our world is out of control now. Surely, people should be able to see this.I won’t pray for world peace, because we might not deserve it. I won’t pry for prosperity, because it would all be taken from us. what I pray for is that God will allow the Hampstead case and all others like it to become knowledge more commonly known than the celebrities they know, or athletes they admire, or politicians they vote for. I direct this pray to the Heavenly Father of us all, in his son Jesus’ name.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s