On the Value of Restraining Orders: who Benefits? Who protects whom? @swpolice @dyfedpowys @gwentpolice

Yesterday we were in Cardiff Crown Court to support Maurice’s fights against a system that has been described in incredible detail on Bent Lawyers and Cops.

Interestingly, Maurice’s cases resembles mine where ‘the system’ tries to imprison us due to breaches of a ‘Restraining Order’ :

  • this Restraining Order was issued by a Magistrates Court on 09 December 2011 to stop him from publishing anything about Dr Tegwyn Williams, the former Director of Caswell Clinic;
    • Maurice argues that it had never been served on him;
    • therefore a ‘variation’ that apparently was served cannot be valid;
  • Dr Williams had not only claimed that Maurice was suffering from brain damage but also tried to ‘section’ him such that he would have had to spend the rest of his life in Ashworth, a highly secure mental hospital;
  • at the time, the effects were particularly disastrous, as he needed a hip replacement, but doctors would not operate due to this ‘fake diagnosis’;
  • since then, Dr Williams has fled the country and claims that Maurice is causing him “professional embarrassment” – never mind the damage he’s done to Maurice to protect South Wales Police from their ‘institutional embarrassment’…

While Maurice represented himself, he later called his pro bono barrister David Leathley to give evidence in support of his challenge:

  • the Restraining Order was an Abuse of Process by South Wales Police who have been hounding him with 33 incidents;
  • Maurice has been trying to sue them for ‘civil damages’, but who can match the corruption of Police and the pockets of the public purse?

David Leathley said that he has spent 16 years as a Crown Prosecutor and that he specialises in clients that nobody takes on. He painted not only an excellent picture of Maurice but also pointed out

  • the difference between the damages caused by Dr Williams, compared with 72-year-old Maurice Kirk who would have to go back to prison yet again – while the real culprit is apparently in New Zealand;
  • the principle of ‘proportionality’ to be required!

But when criminals become ‘victims’ who need to be ‘protected’ from innocents, only Bent Lawyers and Cops paints an adequate picture. It even reports that the Council of Europe had come to investigate UK Police due to violations of human rights!

But who cares: a culture of repression, oppression and suppression has been reigning for decades, if not centuries. ‘Targets’ and ‘austerity’ justify anything now. What a sad state of affairs…

The jury trial is scheduled for 12th September: will they find Maurice guilty or not guilty? Of course he has breached the Restraining Order. But

  • is it valid at all???
  • why was it issued???
  • what was the motive and what was the intention???
  • who motivated the Magistrates Court to issue it???
  • why does it protect someone who is exposed in chapter 10 of this book by the mother of a murdered son?

41tn8d3ihpl-_sx330_bo1204203200_

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Maurice Kirk, McKenzie Friends, McKenzie Friends and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to On the Value of Restraining Orders: who Benefits? Who protects whom? @swpolice @dyfedpowys @gwentpolice

  1. Anonymous says:

    Restraining orders and accused of being paranoid, delusional and in need of sectioning to conceal institutional crimes.

    SHOULD THE PEOPLE OF NEW ZEALAND NOT BE WARNED OF THE THREAT TO ITS CITIZENS BY THIS DELUSIONAL PREDATOR MASQUERADING AS A CREDIBLE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST..

  2. mr Grumpy says:

    There are certain groups in our society which seem to be experiencing problems with credibility, respect, and contempt. Reputations are earned. As far as the people are concerned ‘if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck’. The people are waking up, becoming more aware, and they don’t like what they see.

  3. Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
    Getting to the truth is tantamount to digging a second Channel Tunnel through the mire of corruption with a knife and fork.

  4. Reblogged this on National Inquiry into Organised, Orchestrated & Historic Child Sexual Abuse and commented:

    As Brian Pead is in court again – also linked to a Restraining Order – a new video is available on https://nationalinquiry.wordpress.com/abuse-survivors/whistleblower-brian-pead/videos/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s