Norma Ferrie (no. 11)

This case was first published here – as a tale. Now we have also an A4 summary. It is no. 11 under Grouping Cases to Enforce the Bank of England Act 1694.

Here is the court order we received via Actons Solicitors, and the IVA (Individual Voluntary Arrangement) that my partner and I entered into. This IVA shows that we had to give permission to sell our property. I do not know how the fraudster got around this.

But my partner was accepted as bankrupt of June 2008.

I will be sending this to the SRA (Solicitors  Regulation Authority) as they have asked for a chronicological order of how the fraud took place.

As you will see, I made every effort to have the issues addressed and investigated by the LCS (Legal Complaints Service), but my complaint was thwarted by an untrustworthy employee Simon Gilroy who failed to address the issues raised in my complaint. He failed to address the evidence in support of my complaint. He also failed in his duty to protect the public.

It is clear that the Law Society has been in receipt of evidence as far back as 2005 and up to 2009, when Cort’s solicitors where retained for the purpose of concluding the fraud that began with Jm Taberner of Angel & Co. and our former opponents.

The Law Society would have certainly been involved when John David Cort was arrested for the murder of his Partner at the firm of Corts solicitors.

It is my assertion that the Law Society is culpable and criminally liable in their duty to protect the Public, as the conduct and actions of the legal professional including the Law Society, insured the protection of those involved in the deception and fraudulent possession and theft of my property.

Mr Gilroy’s conclusion of an “adequate service” served the purpose of :-

A) protecting those criminally liable,

B) to prevent and obstruct any further investigations, including criminal.

He was allowed to continue with my case, he fought tooth and nail to stay on the case, despite my objections and complaint, and my request to have him removed form the case. No action was taken against Mr Gilroy.

In the Court order dated 6th of November 2007 there is no mention of the consent order drawn  up by Jm Taberner of the 17th 0f Feb 2005. There is no mention of the court Judgment of the 29th of July 2004. This was a deliberate act on the part of Actons Solicitors to withhold this evidence for the purpose of perverting the course of justice for the “exclusive benefit of the claimant”

I have a receipt from from Actons that they took receipt of our house keys, but no receipt to whom those keys where surrendered to. This question must be answered.

It was our Registered Title Absolute, the Judgment of the 29th of July 2004 that was suppressed by JM Taberner and the claimant that allowed them to pervert the course of Justice for the purpose of their planned criminal activity in Deception and Fraud.

I am sorry that I have not enclosed the judgement of the 29th of July 2004 or our Title deeds, or the consent order of the 17th of Feb 2005. These documents are with a very large pile of documents that I have shut away in the cupboard.

But I will make them available as and when necessary in any criminal investigation that I am asking the SRA to initiate.

Here is the complaint to the SRA.

And here are the latest comments:

The court order displays the claimant being entitled to a charge on our property. Please keep in mind the whole claim was fraudulent from the start. This is the court order we were led to believe was a possession order, by Acton’s solicitors who were acting for us at the time. They took our house keys – I have a receipt for that, only because a few weeks later I insisted, but I do not know who Actons gave our keys to.

The other documents END1 are proof that the claim for charges on our property was a “scam”. If there was any other charge, it would have to be declared on this document. The only charge is our mortgage.

That mortgage was redeemed by John David Cort convicted criminal on 28th of may 2010. Acting for a third party, our mortgage account and names were used for this purpose. This was done without our knowledge, nor was any authority sought or given by us, the account holders.

The FSA have confirmed in an email to me just a couple of weeks agao, that under no circumstances can a redemption figure be released without the account holder’s authority. Therefore there has been a breach under the data protection act on the part of the bank. I believe this is a criminal offence. They also said as for the individuals involved, I may want to report this to the police.

The other Land Registry document shows a protective search as been applied by Grindley of Stoke on Trent whilst we were still the proprietors. By this time the mortgage has been discharged by payment of a third party. Please bear in mind also the former claimant resides in Derby as do we. This was a case of spreading the fraud around.

The property was then transferred into the former claimant’s daughter’s name. The claimant herself does not appear on any of the documents.

I need to know how our property was transferred without our authority or signature. Did these individuals pose as us?

I believe I am right in saying everything that took place prior to this evidence of  the fraudulent possession of our property  would become null and void, because a crime has been committed to take possession of the property?


7 Responses to Norma Ferrie (no. 11)

  1. NickAsher says:

    Dear Sabine & Ms Ferrie,

    The SRA do indeed have a duty to protect the public from rogue solicitors. They seem to be closing down 100 firms of solicitors every year for minor breaches of accounting rules or suspicion of dishonesty.

    However, they have a conflict of interest in investigating the really crooked solicitors, because should the solicitor be found to be dishonest, then the SRA’s cash cow i.e the Compensation Fund would have to indemnify your losses. It is in their interest to cover up the crimes of a dishonest solicitor and keep on protecting from being criminally prosecuted by misdirecting any investigation by the police.

    Read up on Lewis Nicholson’s case. In the case the Serious Fraud Office had to raid the OSS’s now the SRA offices to further their enquiries. To add insult to our intelligence, the Police and the SRA have a Memorandum of Understanding where it is more than likely that the SRA conducts the initial investigation of any files perhaps to clean signs of duplicity by the solicitor concerned.

    The SRA have a serious conflict of interest- i.e. the investigator/ prosecutor is liable to provide compensation if the solicitor complained of is guilty of dishonesty.

    In all the cases found on this site and elsewhere there is always a trail of chain of solicitors who seem to have acted for the victim perpetuating severe financial losses, followed by bankruptcy and displacement. In most of these cases, the lawyers have acted dishonestly and compromised their client’s case by colluding with the opposite side and then of course there is the magic wand of the judge on the bench, behind which the SRA, the police and your MPs seek refuge.

    They cannot go behind a court order, please appeal. The Appeal Court is no different. Permission to Appeal refused, no merit out of time or something frivilous.

    At least your solicitor has been honest but that is no comfort for losing your property.

    • Anonymous says:

      there was no honesty from our previous solicitor, he colluded yo keep all evidence that would have shown any claim brought against us was false.
      he went further than that he perverted the course of justice, he singned a consent order drawn up by our forme opponants solicitor, that led to the fraudulent possesion of our property.

      I have tried the police, they do not want to see the evidence of financial fraud. in a nut shell they believe the perpetrators over the victims, the stronger the evidence against the perpetrators the stronger the resistance to to prosicute, we want a levison style inquiry in to the the legal industries monopoly over the justice systeme and the publics rights of protection.

  2. Rosie says:

    Contact Lawful………whiterabbiteducation

    I have been pulling my hair out re fraud committed by a bank employee to re-possess my home. All fell on deaf ears, even in court. The bank managers pal is now trying to buy it. The web sites mentioned above have been fantastic. Laws and procedures that I was unaware of. And whiterabbiteducation ‘The Spaniard’ will put you onto a fantastic gentleman that is so knowledgeable on the law, it’s unbelievable! There is now a light at the end of the tunnel. Good Luck

  3. Many thanks indeed, Rosie!!!

    I’ve now added the links under “Sites for Support”.

    Many thanks for sharing them and BEST OF LUCK with the b*****ds!

  4. tarjia477 says:

    Is anyone aware of the damage Elizabeth Derrington of The Independent Complaints Review is responsible for? The ICR is made up of many ex Land Registry Staff and were questioned in the House of Commons in July 2009 to its remits and value of use. Since that then exposing how little they did, it has been padded out , although in reality it only ever appears to refer complaints against Land Registry, back to Land Registry. In consultations at The House of Commons relating to complaints systems and services issues for the public, Ms Derrington put forward the module operated by Land Registry as one that should be copied across the board. Bearing in mind that Land Registry operates a ” disengagement policy ” that has no place in law. This policy came in , in 2008 and has been used to temper anyone with valid claims proving maladministration in public office within Land Registry. Now Ms Derrington can add to her “many” roles, the one of complaints handler for investigation into solicitors complained about using the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Surely this is evidence of extreme bias? There is now a race on for privatisation of Land Registry, that had been pencilled in for 2012, being interestingly the same year that ” complete registration of all property / land in England & Wales was meant to have been achieved. The present Chief Executive of Land Registry ( Graham Farrant) has had his role tailored to such a reduction , as that he is not allowed to involve himself in matters of ” registration” . This is because he is only there to safeguard privatisation taking place and ultimately the shutting off to redress of the many hundreds of thousands who have been cheated out of property / land. Land Registry is rotten to the core. It has reached such proportions there is no hope at this late date to cleanse it. Between 2003 ( the year the LRA2002 fully came into force) and 2011, public domain information provided by Land Registry themselves, shows not one case was sucessfully challenged over restrictions put against property / land. This is when you seek to challenge paperwork fictions that a Land Registry form then invites you to challenge if you think you have cause to. Recently l had reply on the ” whatdotheyknow” website to a FOIA request over crucial evidence of findings against Land Registry misleading the Uk Public in regard of an Adjudication by The Advertising Standards Authority of 25 th July 2007 that Land Registry failed to disclose to 6,500 plus cases they themselves referred to the judiciary. Potentially since this ruling in 2007 , hundreds of thousands of cases have endured the stress and financial burdens of court action , that this ruling was evidence of the ineptness and outright collusion with bent Solcitors and Cops, that ultimately beats the victims into submission and loss of their homes. The ASA released their findings for their adjudication going against Land Registry , to the media in 2007 and no one printed it. In essense this adjudication states that not only have Land Registry misled the UK Public over issues of ” over -riding interests ” and ” adverse possession” being protected by the ” registration process” they were selling, it goes further and spells out that in actual fact Land Registry do not have to tell the UK Public if ” over – riding ” exist . In other words purchasing property / land is a very dangerous affair, spiralling out of control when you realise there are more than 350 different known ways that ” over-riding interests ” materialise. The ” secret” part of the register at Land Registry known commonly as ” The Curtain” , is all about depriving owners of property / land and potential purchasers of property / land , of INFORMATION. Information of what has gone on before and even the fact that YOUR personal information ( because of the property / land you have purchased) , will then be given to these HIDDEN FORCES ( being entities seeking to deprive you , to their Financial Enrichment). I would tell victims get out there and source the information you need by other means . The information is there if you know how to search for it. I have proved that legal aid forms have been used within the filing systems of Land Registry and that The Natonal Audit Office meant to be responsible for auditing files at Land Registry in relation to property / land, actually ignore noted errors / identical plans ( meant to represent several different plots of land). Only an idiot signs off two identical plans showing less than 3.42 acres , recorded as 3.42 acres & 50 acres. Only an idiot signs off a file where there is recorded evidence of wrong address / village / postcode. All that is required for audits is the checking of address and plans and the NAO is shown
    as incapable of doing this.

  5. Alan Hardwick says:

    Without Predjudice
    Corruption at its worst & condoned by The Legal Services in all directions & then it seems any Legal Redress you deserved was thwarted by the justice system.
    Suggestion if you can’t get any joy from the ombudsman service ( I have always found them excellent) then Write to your MP or even the Justice Secretary or friendly media but becareful with the latter because they may have there own agenda & I hate to say it the old boys network & money talks.
    Good Luck my friend & I wish you success.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s