An open letter to Theresa May calling for Michael Mansfield QC to chair the Child Abuse Inquiry

3 Comments

Sabine Kurjo McNeill:

Maybe there’s hope as I’ve just started http://www.nationalinquiry.wordpress.com

Originally posted on spotlight:

Dear Theresa May

Re the proposed government inquiry into organised child abuse

As Butler-Sloss stated, the proposed government inquiry into organised child abuse needs to have the confidence of care and abuse survivors. It is for this reason that the view of many survivors and leading specialists in the area of child protection is that the most suitable candidate to chair the announced ‘Child Abuse Inquiry’ is Michael Mansfield QC.

The chair of this inquiry will need fearlessness, to be prepared to challenge the authorities and to ask and get answers to very difficult questions. This is a role that can only be undertaken by someone clearly seen as outside the establishment.

Mr Mansfield has shown with his work on the Stephen Lawrence inquiry and the current Hillsborough inquiry that he has the respect of survivors and professionals to undertake this inquiry.

In addition to the need to have the…

View original 420 more words

CHILDREN TO BE HEARD? Open Letter to the Minister of State for Justice and Civil Liberties

6 Comments

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the Nation...

English: Anti-paedophilia logo from the National Revival of Poland (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Dear Rt Hon Simon Hughes MP

OPEN LETTER

I was so delighted by your announcement regarding children to be heard that I published it on one of my blogs: No Punishment without Crime.

However, as Goethe said in Faust: The message well I hear, my faith alone is weak.

This is illustrated by the video that I was sent on the same day and that you will see on the post above: your announcement is too little too late in my view.

I asked all MPs who had not committed themselves to the National Inquiry into Organised Child Sexual Abuse: Do you want to stop child snatching and paedophile scandals? Everybody Knows!

For the violation of the UN Convention on Child Rights is institutionalised:

  1. Weare concerned about the children who don’t get heard in PUBLIC law not private custody cases:
    • As Channel IV publishes: every 20 minutes a child is taken!
    • Some 100,000 children are in care, as repeatedly published by the Daily Mail.
    • According to Edward Timpson MP, 50 die every year, but he considers this number ‘very low’.
    • Already in 2006, Harriet Harman admitted in Parliament that 200 parents were imprisoned every year by the secrecy of the family courts.
    • How many get deported and their cases ‘disposed’, while their children are kept in the UK? For what purpose?
    • The ‘child processing industry’ is a major contributing factor to the UK’s GDP, as these statistics
    • But who cares? According to John Hemming MP it’s policy, after all!
  2. CAFCASS is part of the problem, not the solution, ascan be demonstrated by many cases we have assisted
    • The letter by the 12 year old Emanuel fearing ‘bum rape’ to HHJ Simler was ignored and she did not admit a question in court; I published it here.
    • 35 letters by the 14 year old Anastasia to the judge were ignored; we presented her story as part of a portfolio of nine cases to the Education Committee when it looked into child protection.
    • But Pat Glass MP and Ed Timpson MP believed that the UK system of forced adoption is worth exporting – at the time into Barbados.
    • As I learned in Brussels when I presented Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent and the Systemic Patterns of Child Snatching and Forced Adoptions to the EU Petitions Committee on 19 March 2014: it had already been ‘shipped’ to the Netherlands and other countries.
    • Subsequently, many parents were penalised for having gone to Brussels, as John Hemming MP put down in this EDM.

More

WHOM DO YOU ASK for help when the State bullies you for whistleblowing on paedophilia – especially once imprisoned?

19 Comments

14 07 23 from Hillsborough to Lambeth Front coverFirst I saw the fraudulent imprisonment of Vicky Haigh when I acted as McKenzie Friend for her, together with Liz Watson who was also sent to prison on fabricated charges. Vicky had asked Social Services for help with the abuse her daughter was experiencing from her father.

  • First lesson learned: never ever ask Social Services for help!
  • Daddy does things to me he shouldn’t, and now I can’t see mummy any more.
  • The rest is a network of corrupt guys at the right place in the right institution…

Then I saw Gloria and Chiwar Musa being imprisoned as two of the some 200 parents who are sent to prison by secret family courts every year, as Harriet Harman admitted in Parliament in 2006.

  • Second lesson: never think you can trust a judge, jury or another judge, let alone the Social Workers, Police Officers, lawyers and NHS staff involved.
  • The eldest daughter was molested by the son of her foster carer.
  • The second daughter told her mum that they were taken to dark places at night where there are only men.
  • The son asked: mummy, what is paedophilia?

Then we visited Melissa Laird in HMP Holloway. She had been advised to plead guilty to get her son back.

And we saw how prison conditions in HMP Holloway are just as bad as in HMP Cardiff for Maurice Kirk – especially to stop Litigants in Person from advancing their case. At the same time, it is impossible to get trustworthy lawyers. And now not even Legal Aid.

  • Next lesson: Complaint procedures don’t result in anything.
  • HMP Governors hide behind communication walls and Police or Prison Inspectors are not responsible or find other excuses.

The latest ‘cri de coeur’ comes from whistleblower Brian Pead who now calls himself William Brian Freeman. He has been in 5 prisons since 14 May 2014.

So I wrote: Dear Sir or Madam More

DON’T TAKE MY CHILD on ITV + EXARO News about the Organised Child Sexual Abuse inquiry

10 Comments

14 07 16 ExaroRemarkable, last night’s program Don’t Take my Child in the EXPOSURE series of ITV:

  • the secretly recorded video of a baby taken after birth that resulted in Sir James Munby’s appeal to courts to take the realities of the internet more seriously, particularly social media
  • Ian Josephs who has been helping some 1,000 parents a year for 50 years from Monaco
  • a mum who fled to France to keep her baby: John Hemming MP had said on Russia Today that parents can’t have a fair trial in the UK – due to the secrecy of family courts.

The Pedros had been arrested by Lincoln Police because they were accused of being part of a ‘forced adoption group’ whose policy it is to flee the country!

That’s the child snatching side or #childsnatchuk and #forcedadoption and #forcedadoptionexposed in hashtags.

But then there is #paedobritain, as exposed by EXARO News:

More

FROM TELEGRAPH to German tabloid: paedophile scandal in Westminster!

22 Comments

14 07 06 BILDFirst the Telegraph published “More than 10 politicians on list held by police investigating Westminster paedophile ring” 

Then the German tabloid BILD reported on the issue:

Meanwhile, 142 MPs are asking for a National Enquiry:

Michael Murrin keeps asking for a Royal Commission which would take 5 years apparently:  More

WHEN JUSTICE VANISHES and the Rule of Law erodes, Self-Help arrives thanks to the net

9 Comments

Institute of Race Relations

Institute of Race Relations (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Amazing, there is secrecy where there could be transparency:

1. Secrecy in Family Courts

  • we’ve long campaigned and petitioned and Sir James Munby has made the difference
  • Belinda McKenzie attended the hearing on 23 May 2014 in Watford where HHJ Parker announced proudly on behalf of her colleagues that this was a ‘public’ hearing of a family court;

2. Justice vanishes: the Erosion of the Rule of Law is an article published by the Institute of Race Relations. I received the link from mojuk AT mojuk.org.uk – John O provides this News Service about Miscarriages of Justice in the UK (MOJUK). It refers to

  • a criminal court hearing being heard in secret – presumably not the one and only one
  • secret evidence – presumably not the first time either
  • and secrecy in inquests – which is something I’ve come across before as well.

But who cares???

Help4Lips do! They help Litigants in Person (LiPs) stay out of court by giving access to information:  More

LORD JAMES of BLACKHEATH on historic child trafficking and current child abuse

12 Comments

English: A map of the British Empire in 1921 w...

English: A map of the British Empire in 1921 when it was at its height. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

7.57 pm – 09 June 2014 – Column 207 – Hansard Publications

Lord James of Blackheath (Con): My Lords, I have indicated previously the impact that forced migration has had upon my family. We had in the Queen’s Speech a Bill for dealing with the abuse of children and the intention to bring forward better controls over trafficking. Those are closely connected. This country has a terrible record in its handling of the migration of its own subjects. It has combined the most appalling suffering of children with the most appalling lack of management of the migration process to get the worst of every world. There should be no smugness around these two initiatives going forward. It is a very small penance to pay for a very big crime.

It started in 1682. The first migration in this country happened when one of the early colonies in North America was raided by the Indians, who took all 84 of its children and would not give them back. No one knows what happened to them. The colony sent a communication back to England by the first available boat saying, “Look, we have no children and therefore no future. Send us some children”. The Mayor of London was asked to deal with it and he did. He sent his beadles out on to the streets of London and took the first 84 vagrant kids he could find. He sent them down to a boat at Rotherhithe and sent them to America. He told the captain that he could pay for the trip by taking the kids out and bringing it back with a load of tobacco on board and that would pay for it, and it did. Unfortunately, it created the precedent of making it seem that trafficking these children was profitable, which it was. More

Older Entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,678 other followers